Tom Moody, comments...

  • This panel was discussed at length here:http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/04/18/futures-of-the-internet-a-long-summation-with-pictures/http://www.artfagcity.com/2008/04/28/the-aesthetics-of-browsers/I have some ideas of why these kinds of lively discussions … Read more
  • , Tom Moody in Brush-off
    Paddy:A brief recap of the Tom/T.Whid fight history (simplication is not attempt to mischaracterize and I'm not in this … Read more
  • , Tom Moody in Brush-off
    Rob,I didn't say "computer envy" was the only link between the two bodies of work.You might recall that … Read more
  • , Tom Moody in Brush-off
    That is, painters exhibiting in NY in the last decade… Read more
  • , Tom Moody in Brush-off
    Clarification of the clarification (a post on this may be necessary, with pictures): Manetas has made art with the computer, … Read more
  • , Tom Moody in Brush-off
    A friend thinks I need to address this observation of Rob Myers':>>Nesbitt's picture doesn't look photorealistic, it looks like … Read more
  • , Tom Moody in Brush-off
    I meant vis a vis and not via in the next to last sentence. Read more
  • , Tom Moody in Brush-off
    Rob, you're being a bit selective in reducing my timeline from Nesbitt –> Proops. I did mention some other artists … Read more
  • , Tom Moody in Brush-off
    Some afterthoughts from my blog (http://www.tommoody.us/archives/2008/04/15/dan-proops/):Based on the jpegs (http://www.samsdesktop2.com) it looks like another case … Read more
  • , Tom Moody in Brush-off
    Another typo, darn: "I think criticism helps us understand artists' work, even Dan Proops'. " is what was intended.And … Read more