if we really need Web 2.0 then we definitely need Netart 2.0

Since people have been going around saying that netart is dead, I've decided to re-invent it with a flexibly ambiguous manifesto. Of course, the manifesto should be as dynamic as the art so I'm open to suggestions/comments. Maybe it will be the first manifesto of variable manifestation (that would be an awesome title!) or maybe it could be seen as being void of manifestation due to its variability (I'll have to think about these things). The document can be viewed at:

http://pallit.lhi.is/netart_2_0.html

ps. I've updated the title

Comments

, Eric Dymond

Pall Thayer wrote:

> Since people have been going around saying that netart is dead, I've
> decided to re-invent it with a flexibly ambiguous manifesto. Of
> course, the manifesto should be as dynamic as the art so I'm open to
> suggestions/comments. Maybe it will be the first manifesto of variable
> manifestation (that would be an awesome title!) or maybe it could be
> seen as being void of manifestation due to its variability (I'll have
> to think about these things). The document can be viewed at:
>
> http://pallit.lhi.is/netart_2_0.html
>
> ps. I've updated the title
Don't Fear the Reaper
(Blue Oyster Cult…, as if)