Dear Rhizomers ,
MANIK have no problem with your stubbornness and illogical praxis to avoid =
his/her name in discussions(and stupid/Digest).We are worried about some o=
f you who have some chance (still).
What's going to happened to them if they continued to follow rhizome.org Na=
zi(onnalistic)American-corporative-capitalistic path?If you doubt in MANIK'=
S word just see Lauren Cornel interview in one online magazine(sorry,we've =
forgot which one).
It's not the problem you don't want to see problem existed(:-),problem's th=
at you can't see them,but you pretend you 'just don't care' .But how can yo=
u pretend if you are not conscious that 'it' exist?(Lacane,1957)
OK.-we have little time to help you:
First- you could see one Nazis artist triumphal return(Arno Becker)on art =
scene-http://wt.us.publicus.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060725/NEWS/=
607250382 )?
So,conclusion's that Nazi ideology is not so bad after all,not even in art,=
it's produced some object of art,isn't it?Just like you,like in net(nyet ar=
t).
Are you fallow us?
Our English is equivalent with your (un) knowledge,so…don't be nervous -p=
lease.
Our nyet art,and process of deartisation's not attack on your 'artistic'exi=
stance.It's just warning that all of us should be careful in thinking about=
nyet art,because fact that something existed in physical world couldn't be=
guaranty (at all) that this 'object',or creation belong to world of artist=
ic imagination,it's not sublime 'par excellence.So:Manevich,Shulgin,Cory,Co=
sic,MTTTAR9vggrtr,Jody and other from your "Father"list belong to art in sa=
me way as Arno Becker,or,in other word,as O.D.Balzac said in 'Cuisine Beta:=
"She belong to chastity like a whore to virtue."Fact that we produced *fact=
for art*(artefact)mean exactly the same like in Arno's Becker case.To be d=
eep and completely involve in one capitalist-corporative-theroristic and pl=
under society-USA(same as poor Arno was in such 'heavy calumniate' Nazi Ge=
rman),and pretend that you have no 'idea about what MANIK talking about' is=
your poor defense,and in spite of moral disgust, we must try to understan=
d,especially younger people among you.
Love you all
MANIK
ARNO BECKER IN DISNEYLAND
-
Type: discussion
Comments
—– Original Message —–
From: manik
To: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, July 30, 2006 12:00 AM
Subject: ARNO BECKER IN DISNEYLAND
Dear Rhizomers ,
MANIK have no problem with your stubbornness and illogical praxis to avoi=
d his/her name in discussions(and stupid/Digest).We are worried about some=
of you who have some chance (still).
What's going to happened to them if they continued to follow rhizome.org =
Nazi(onnalistic)American-corporative-capitalistic path?If you doubt in MANI=
K'S word just see Lauren Cornel interview in one online magazine(sorry,we'v=
e forgot which one).
It's not the problem you don't want to see problem existed(:-),problem's =
that you can't see them,but you pretend you 'just don't care' .But how can =
you pretend if you are not conscious that 'it' exist?(Lacane,1957)
OK.-we have little time to help you:
First- you could see one Nazis artist triumphal return(Arno Becker)on art=
scene-http://wt.us.publicus.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060725/NEWS=
/607250382 )?
So,conclusion's that Nazi ideology is not so bad after all,not even in ar=
t,it's produced some object of art,isn't it?Just like you,like in net(nyet =
art).
Are you fallow us?
Our English is equivalent with your (un) knowledge,so…don't be nervous =
-please.
Our nyet art,and process of deartisation's not attack on your 'artistic'e=
xistance.It's just warning that all of us should be careful in thinking abo=
ut nyet art,because fact that something existed in physical world couldn't =
be guaranty (at all) that this 'object',or creation belong to world of arti=
stic imagination,it's not sublime 'par excellence.So:Manevich,Shulgin,Cory,=
Cosic,MTTTAR9vggrtr,Jody and other from your "Father"list belong to art in =
same way as Arno Becker,or,in other word,as O.D.Balzac said in 'Cuisine Bet=
a:"She belong to chastity like a whore to virtue."Fact that we produced *fa=
ct for art*(artefact)mean exactly the same like in Arno's Becker case.To be=
deep and completely involve in one capitalist-corporative-theroristic and =
plunder society-USA(same as poor Arno was in such 'heavy calumniate' Nazi G=
erman),and pretend that you have no 'idea about what MANIK talking about' i=
s your poor defense,and in spite of moral disgust, we must try to understan=
d,especially younger people among you.
Love you all
MANIK