Re: PIG IN THE PENAL COLONY

Nov. 13, 2005

Type: discussion

First mankind note was cut in skin-scarification(mostly owe;woman and
cattle).Your skin was your endorser&walking check. Deposit's your
life.(______________________________________________________________________
_______________________)
Numbers on conc.lager's camp
inmate(_____________________________________________________________________
__)
hand/skin was sign that he belong to somebody,he's object- property,obscure
ideology possess(____________________________)
this body and processes of "Discipline and Punish"(Foucault)could flow
fluently.But that's not the end of cruel *panopticism*,it's just
beginning.In time of antagonism(XXIcentury)between
poor-rich,Islam-Christianity,State
terrorism(desecrate,global,multicorporational…)
against religious,fanatic,suicidal terrorism of small(?) group invoke
drastic move.We couldn't be sure how,but it's for sure that processes of
mark,tracking,identification are going to have something with our
body.Implant,sample of tissue(DNK)will be new passports&computers and
programming powerful means in processes of instant identification
of(suspect)or danger persons,finally we've seen all those stuff in
Schwarzeneneger's&Stalone's movies.&we all know that computer
games,nanotechnology,biotechnology…etc.in "art"and/or programming could be
and they are dangerous resources in hands on the other side of
ethic/aesthetic(see Virillio____)(_____…)In those circumstance we feel
that "NM art","programming art",software art"contain immanent pathogenic
essence,they're dangerous because we couldn't be sure who fool around with
this weapon.It's absurdity to distribute huge quantity of weapon&expect to
be use in merciful
act.(_______________________________________________________________________
________)
Eduardo Katz's fluorescent rabbit Alba very soon could be fluorescent man
under permanent control&supervision.Whole poor&different race&religion
population could be fluorescent,scarificated with new technology and put in
slave position in some new order marking of power.Different between Einstein
and Tesla is ethical nature.Tesla was one's asked about nuclear fission.He
said":I was there."Obvious that his ethic demand instant distant from
ambivalence place,but not Einstein's amorality.He felt direct responsibility
for Hiroshima&Nagasaki,and his pathetic letters against atomic bomb show all
hypocrisy of one a-moral ambitious man.So,somebody from list suggest
changing name for art.Idea which deserve special attention.From now art
shouldn't be named as art.That must be something else,like"technae"for
example(same time craft&art in ancient Greece)."Call me however you like,but
don't beat me…"Slightly" different between painting and programming
considered their potential efficiency is that painting's could be in best
case sublime reflection of some idea,precognition,intention or
propaganda.Programming could be praxis connected with unforeseeable
consequences which could be extreme far from any aesthetic."NM art"should be
discuss separate from painting,drawing&other *classic*art disciplines.We
don't believe in human goodness&essential harmless.That's the reason we
can't see good reason to mix classic art and programming art.We still use
some of *classic*art(aesthetic) principle,which mean we still "believe"
which is basically religious category&have very little with raw process of
outside.
Mankind goodness is rare exception,evil's almost rule.
We believe it's irresponsibility to pretend that we belief in ethic use of
programming in future,including programming in"art"purpose.
New technology looking for whole spectra of new/different strategic
study&education including persistence insist on strategic role of ethic.It
require whole new infrastructure(ideology?).
Is there any of you so naive to believe is that possible?
MANIK
PS:There's few jolly sites below!
http://www.needled.com/2005/07/wim_delvoyes_art_farm_of_tatto.php
http://news.agendainc.com/mt-agenda/content/archives/2005/08/chinese_pig_get
.html
http://www.geocities.com/robleh.geo/penal_colony.htm

—– Original Message —–
From: "Eric Dymond" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2005 8:37 AM
Subject: RHIZOME_RAW: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 10 questions/more art

> I think it's OK to tatoo animals with poems.
> Especially sheep who have been shaved so that i can wear a nice wool
sweater in the winter, which is always warmer than cotton or silk.
> and the sheep might pick up some literary skills if the poems are good
ones.
> But if they are bad poems written by spinsters in Schenecdaty then that is
an awful thing to do to the sheep. They should be exposed to great poetry ,
esp. if they are getting it tatooed permanently onto their bodies.
> How emabarrassing it would be for sheep to have to live a lives as the
bearers of bad poetry (burned into/onto their skin!).
> my God that is really cruel.
> We will need to have a contest, or a commission to determine what poems
can be burned onto a sheeps hide.
> Maybe a government department that can adjudicate the quality of sheep
tatoo poetry.
> And we could vote for a standard that kept the sheep from being embarrased
by the poetry they will be forced to bear.
> I think we need a web aite and forum to discuss this in detail before
making any rash decisions..,
> but what do I know.
> Eric
> +
> -> post: [email protected]
> -> questions: [email protected]
> -> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
> -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
> +
> Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
> Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.php
>