Plans To Scrap WTC Towers For $5.6 Bn In 1989

Check it out.
FYI

Lee Wells
Brooklyn, NY 11222

http://www.leewells.org
917 723 2524

——–

>From Karl W. B. Schwarz
[email protected]
12-6-4

To Jimmy Walter

Hi Jimmy, your comment completely misses the point.

That is why, in 1989, they planned a $5.6 billion takedown and rebuild, it
was tanked.

The witness came to me…and we are protecting them.

The building had the structural equivalent of osteoporosis.

I am about to fund $25-50 million to THE LAWSUIT - United States Citizens v
United States Government. Something major happened over the past several
days.

Karl

—–Original Message—–

From: Jimmy Walter
Sent: Monday, December 06, 2004 12:49 PM
To: 'Karl W. B. Schwarz'
Subject: RE: galvanic versus flying beams

No amount of galvanic action will hurl steel beams straight out horizontally
and cause the building to fall at the speed of gravity. However, it would be
cause for insurance fraud!
But keep trying

_____

From: Karl W. B. Schwarz
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 1:22 PM
To: Jimmy Walter

Hello Jimmy

You are going to wind up owing me the $100,000. :-)

The Statute of Liberty had to be repaired due to galvanic corrosion in air.
Not what most think is possible but in ocean environments, very possible.
Normally galvanic corrosion is only a factor in an electrolyte such as sea
water and the stern drive on the boat - having steel and aluminum components
- erodes, turns brittle and snap - it fails - if electrolytic grounding
plates are not installed.


"""The galvanic reaction between iron and copper was originally mitigated by
insulating copper from the iron framework using an asbestos cloth soaked in
shellac. However, the integrity and sealing property of this improvised
insulator broke down over the many years of exposure to high levels of
humidity normal in a marine environment. The insulating barrier became a
sponge that kept the salted water present as a conductive electrolyte,
forming a crude electrochemical cell as Volta had discovered a century
earlier."""


In 1989 - there were plans to erect scaffolding and disassemble the WTC
towers and rebuild them. Cost projection was around $5.6 billion. One of the
architects shows up to work one day and the MIB's were there - had
confiscated all of the plans, specs, details, etc for WTC. They even
confiscated their office cubicles and had tape on the floor outlining where
they went.

Reason - the exterior cast aluminum WTC panels had been directly connected
to the steel superstructure of the building, thus causing galvanic
corrosion. In short, the "life cycle" of the WTC was not 200 - 300 years,
more like 30 years or so.

The exterior skin of the building - in being aluminum and connected directly
to the super structure - was making the building weaker every day.

That could explain why there appears to be explosives set only about every
25 floors. Once the failure started, the brittleness of welds, rivets,
bolts, etc would fail much easier as the loads became progressively greater
on the way down.

That same process would also explain why the concrete was "powderized" over
time because electrolytic processes weaken concrete too by "debonding" the
Portland that causes concrete to bond in the first place. However, bear in
mind that the "concrete floors" were not load bearing reinforced concrete.
They were supported by what was a weakening by the day superstructure and
cross members.

There was a 1989 meeting and the folks at the architectural firm [Emory
Roth, the project architect that took over after the design architects
completed the conceptual drawings] that had their office, records, plans and
specs seized - were told that the $5.6 billion "take it down, rebuild it"
project was cancelled and in about "10-12 years" they would "blow it up and
start over". Consider that - and consider that NYC and the US Govt could not
stand the global embarrassment of being so stupid or negligent that they did
not consider the effects of galvanic corrosion on the superstructure. That
is structural design 101 in architectural school and why they want
architects to take physics and chemistry for Christ's sake. I did.

I am an architect by the way, quit practicing in 1988.

http://www.npl.co.uk/ncs/docs/the_electochemistry_of_corrosion_figures.p df

http://www.npl.co.uk/ncs/docs/the_electochemistry_of_corrosion.pdf

http://www.corrosion-doctors.org/Aircraft/galvdefi.htm see bimetallic
corrosion to get to the two links above

http://www.corrosion-doctors.org/Landmarks/statue-saddle.htm

Guess what?

The fat lady HAS SUNG. You know, the one in New York Harbor with the torch
of Liberty and Freedom held high.

I want to find the sick bastard that thought it would be a cute idea to have
close to 3,000 in the building and use that as an excuse to go take on a
whole new energy policy, war policy, and lining the pockets of just certain
people.

I think a Statute of Liberty hanging for that person would be most
appropriate.

best regards,

Karl W. B. Schwarz
President, Chief Executive Officer
Patmos Nanotechnologies, LLC

http://rense.com/general60/scrap.htm

________________________________________________________________
Juno Gift Certificates
Give the gift of Internet access this holiday season.
http://www.juno.com/give



—— End of Forwarded Message