duchamp's ghost tested several times in spelling checker

Duchamp was a minor artist.

nikola pilipovic wrote:

> DUCHAMPUHAM
> MUCH DUPUC
> PACH PAMUC
> DUMPC ACH
> CHAMP MAD
> MACH CUP
> DUCH UCH
> PUCH CAM
> MUCH PAM
> UMPAC MAC
> HAMPA PU
> MACHU CUM
> DUCH MUD
> CHAM MAP
> HADA CHAP
> APCH DAM
> CHAM UD
> UCHAD PUD
> MAHCU PUM
> DUH PUH
> MARCELDUCHAMP

MANIK was a minor artist.

>MANIK
>INK
>MAN
>KAMAN
>KINA
>MICK
>AMINO
>ACNE
>MAKING
>INK
>MAN
>KAM
>KINA
>MIK
>AMNIK
>AKNI
>MAKNI

——-Original Message——-

From: Eric Dymond
Date: Sunday, December 05, 2004 07:57:28 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RHIZOME_RAW: Re: duchamp's ghost tested several times in spelling
checker

Duchamp was a minor artist.

nikola pilipovic wrote:

> DUCHAMPUHAM =

> MUCH DUPUC
> PACH PAMUC
> DUMPC ACH
> CHAMP MAD
> MACH CUP
> DUCH UCH
> PUCH CAM
> MUCH PAM
> UMPAC MAC
> HAMPA PU
> MACHU CUM
> DUCH MUD
> CHAM MAP
> HADA CHAP
> APCH DAM
> CHAM UD
> UCHAD PUD
> MAHCU PUM
> DUH PUH
> MARCELDUCHAMP
+
-> post: [email protected]
-> questions: [email protected]
-> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
-> give: http://rhizome.org/support
-> visit: on Fridays the Rhizome.org web site is open to non-members
+
Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.php

.

On Dec 5, 2004, at 12:45 AM, Eric Dymond wrote:
> >Duchamp was a minor artist.

i had no idea that Duchamp made minors.

//jonCates
http://www.criticalartware.net/
http://systemsApproach.net
http://artic.edu/~jcates

<–! NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION EXCEPT ON RHIZOME.ORG WEBSITE AND EMAIL
LISTS. !—>

On 7 Dec 2004, at 12:49, //jonCates wrote:

> On Dec 5, 2004, at 12:45 AM, Eric Dymond wrote:
>> >Duchamp was a minor artist.
>
> i had no idea that Duchamp made minors.

No, no. He was a child.

I thought I saw a mynah artist once, but it was actually a bower bird.

- Rob.