continuing saga…
———- Forwarded message ———-
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 17:41:44 -0700
From: EFFector list <[email protected]>
To: joy garnett <[email protected]>
Subject: EFFector 17.38: Indymedia Servers Mysteriously Reappear,
But Questions Remain
EFFector Vol. 17, No. 38 October 13, 2004 [email protected]
A Publication of the Electronic Frontier Foundation
ISSN 1062-9424
In the 309th Issue of EFFector:
* Indymedia Servers Mysteriously Reappear, But Questions
Remain
* In File-Sharing Witchhunts, RIAA Is Foiled Again
* Entertainment Giants Push Supreme Court to Rewrite
Copyright Law
* MiniLinks (12): DoJ Report Endorses PDEA, Induce Act
* Administrivia
For more information on EFF activities & alerts:
<http://www.eff.org/>
To join EFF or make an additional donation:
<https://secure.eff.org/>
EFF is a member-supported nonprofit. Please sign up as a
member today!
: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :
* Indymedia Servers Mysteriously Reappear, But Questions
Remain
San Francisco, CA - Computer servers seized by the US
government last week have now been returned to Rackspace
Managed Hosting, but questions remain about why and
under what authority this outrageous incident occured.
EFF, which is representing a coalition of independent
Internet journalists whose websites were shut down by
the seizure, will examine the servers to make sure that
they are secure and to preserve evidence for future
legal action.
The seizure, which took place on October 7, was in response
to a "Commissioner's Subpoena" issued at the request
of a foreign government. Although initial reports suggested
that the FBI had taken the servers, the FBI has since
denied any involvement. Citing a gag order, Rackspace
continues to decline to comment on what happened.
The servers hosted Indymedia's Internet radio station
and more than 20 Indymedia websites, as well as several
email lists. When they were seized, it silenced numerous
political news websites for several days - a clear
violation of the First Amendment.
"Secret orders silencing US media should be beyond the
realm of possibility in a country that believes in freedom
of speech," said EFF Staff Attorney Kurt Opsahl. "EFF was
founded with the Steve Jackson Games case 14 years ago,
and at that time we established that seizing entire
servers because of a claim about some pieces of
information on them is blatantly illegal and improper.
It appears the government forgot this basic rule, and
we will need to remind them."
EFF will take legal action to find out what really
happened to the servers and ensure that the media are
protected from this kind of egregious First Amendment
violation in the future.
For the breaking news item:
<http://www.eff.org/news/archives/2004_10.php#002006>
For the previous press release: "EFF Challenges Secret
Government Order to Shut Down Media Websites:
<http://www.eff.org/news/archives/2004_10.php#001992>
: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :
* In File-Sharing Witchhunts, RIAA Is Foiled Again
Washington, DC - The Supreme Court on Tuesday denied a
request by the Recording Industry Association of America
(RIAA) to hear its appeal of a lower court decision that
under some circumstances Internet Service Providers (ISPs)
do not have to hand over the names of people suspected
of copyright infringement.
The case grows out of an incident in which the RIAA used
a controversial subpoena provision under the 1998 Digital
Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) to demand that Verizon
Internet Services reveal the identity of a Verizon subscriber
who allegedly used KaZaA peer-to-peer software to share
copyrighted music online. Verizon refused to divulge the
subscriber's identity, claiming that the provision didn't
cover alleged copyright-infringing material that resides
on an individual's computer, only material that resides
on an ISP's server.
After the District Court rejected Verizon's interpretation
of the DMCA subpoena provision, Verizon appealed. EFF led
a coalition of public interest groups and ISPs that filed
friend-of-the court briefs in support of Verizon, arguing
that the RIAA's subpoenas failed to respect the privacy
and First Amendment rights of Internet users. The DC
Circuit Court agreed, finding that the subpoenas were not
authorized by the DMCA. It granted Verizon's request to
quash a second subpoena it had received in the meantime
and said that the ISP would not have to hand over
information requested in the first.
But the RIAA didn't give up. First, it requested a rehearing
in the DC Circuit court and was denied. Finally, it
appealed to the Supreme Court.
"The Supreme Court's refusal to take the case leaves the
DC Circuit's well-reasoned opinion as law: The DMCA doesn't
give the RIAA a blank fishing license to issue subpoenas
and invade Internet users' privacy," said EFF Staff
Attorney Wendy Seltzer.
For this release:
<http://www.eff.org/news/archives/2004_10.php#001991>
: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :
* Entertainment Giants Push Supreme Court to Rewrite
Copyright Law
Washington, DC - A group of 25 entertainment companies
last week filed a petition for certiorari with the Supreme
Court, asking the Court to rewrite copyright law principles
that establish when high-tech companies can be held
liable for the copyright infringements of their
customers.
The petition asks the Supreme Court to overturn the recent
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decision in MGM v. Grokster,
where the court ruled that Grokster and StreamCast Networks
were not liable for the infringements committed by people
using their software to share copyrighted works. EFF is
counsel for StreamCast in the case.
"The entertainment industry petition is a frontal attack
on the Betamax doctrine and threatens innovators of every
stripe," said EFF Senior Staff Attorney Fred von Lohmann,
who argued the MGM v. Grokster case before the Ninth Circuit.
The Betamax doctrine takes its name from a landmark 1984
Supreme Court case involving the Sony Betamax VCR. Often
described as the Magna Carta of the technology industry,
the Betamax doctrine makes it clear that innovators
need not fear ruinous litigation from the entertainment
industry so long as their inventions are "merely capable
of substantial noninfringing uses."
In the petition for certiorari, the entertainment industry
urges the Court to reverse that established rule and impose
on innovators a "legal duty either to have designed their
services differently to prevent infringing uses, or to take
reasonable steps going forward to do so." Under such a rule,
Sony's Betamax VCR would never have seen the light of day,
since Sony could have designed it differently or could have
modified it after Disney and Universal Studios complained.
The entertainment industry's petition was filed just one
day after Senator Orrin Hatch (R-UT) announced that the
Senate was not ready to adopt his Inducing Infringement
of Copyrights Act, S. 2560 (formerly known as the INDUCE
Act). He suggested that Congress would return to the issue
next year. "The entertainment industry appears to think
that it can treat the Supreme Court and Congress
interchangeably in pushing for their rewrite of copyright
law," said von Lohmann. "But it's Congress that writes
the Copyright Act, not the courts. The Supreme Court will
not be eager to end-run Congress on this complex
legislative issue."
Added EFF Staff Attorney Jason Schultz, "The RIAA and MPAA
refuse to accept the reality that consumers and technology
companies have rights too. They are hell-bent on writing
their own laws, one way or another."
EFF will file a response brief with the Supreme Court on
behalf of StreamCast in mid-November. It will be several
months before the Supreme Court determines whether to
hear the case.
For this release:
<http://www.eff.org/news/archives/2004_10.php#001988>
: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :
* miniLinks
miniLinks features noteworthy news items from around the
Internet.
~ Employers Monitor "Cyberslacking"
This article looks at the emergence of employers who spy on
workers to keep them from - heaven forbid - using eBay on
company time:
<http://www.eff.org/cgi/tiny?urlID(3>
(SF Chronicle)
~ Monsanto Busted for Patenting Indian Wheat
By Greenpeace, no less:
<http://sify.com/finance/fullstory.php?id582831>
~ DoJ Report Endorses PDEA, Induce Act
Meaning that you, the taxpayer, could soon find yourself
paying for the entertainment industry's war on
filesharing - while watching innovators pack up shop and
head overseas:
<http://www.eff.org/cgi/tiny?urlID(2>
(CNet)
~ P2P Lawsuits Hit Europe
The recording industry is takes its sue-the-fans act on
a world tour:
<http://uk.news.yahoo.com/041007/80/f433e.html>
~ BusinessWeek on Copyright v. Innovation
Heather Green on the chilling effects of copyright
maximalism and abuse:
<http://www.eff.org/cgi/tiny?urlID(9>
~ Diebold Cuts Financial Forecast
The company is learning the hard way that fixing a machine
*after* you sell it is more expensive than doing it right
the first time:
<http://www.eff.org/cgi/tiny?urlID(4>
(Computerworld)
~ eDonkey Beats KaZaA
eDonkey bested KaZaA in the latest rating from BayTSP,
making it the world's most popular file-sharing
application. John Borland suggests that KaZaA
lost the top spot because it's been too busy fighting
off lawsuits to keep its technology up-to-date:
<http://www.eff.org/cgi/tiny?urlID(5>
(CNet)
~ JibJab Releases Another Animation
And we don't see any copyright lawyers hovering:
<http://www.eff.org/cgi/tiny?urlID(6>
~ Hollywood Pushes Supreme Court to Consider P2P
One day after failing to push the Induce Act past the
goal line, Hollywood predictably put in its bid an
end-run around Congress by filing a petition for cert
in the Grokster case. Here's the bizarre twist: its
legal team includes both Kenneth Starr (President
Clinton's prosecutor during his impeachment scandal)
and David Kendall (Clinton's personal lawyer during
the scandal):
<http://www.wired.com/news/digiwood/0,1412,65290,00.html>
~ Gov't Funds Yearlong Chat Room Surveillance Study
Privacy implications aside, we've been in a few chat
rooms in our day, and we're pretty sure that the findings
will be hilarious:
<http://www.eff.org/cgi/tiny?urlID(8>
(AP)
~ "No-Fly List" Has "No Rules, Procedures"
According to CNN.com, "The 'no-fly' watch list - billed
as a post-9/11 weapon in the United States' war on terror
- lacks guidance on adding and deleting names and a method
of consolidating more than a dozen lists maintained
by various government agencies."
<http://www.cnn.com/2004/US/10/10/terror.watch.list/>
~ More Mainstream Coverage for "Some Rights Reserved"
Creative Commons is all over the place!
<http://www.eff.org/cgi/tiny?urlID(7>
(AP)
: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :
* Administrivia
EFFector is published by:
The Electronic Frontier Foundation
454 Shotwell Street
San Francisco CA 94110-1914 USA
+1 415 436 9333 (voice)
+1 415 436 9993 (fax)
http://www.eff.org/
Editor:
Donna Wentworth, Web Writer/Activist
[email protected]
Membership & donation queries:
[email protected]
General EFF, legal, policy, or online resources queries:
[email protected]
Reproduction of this publication in electronic media is
encouraged. Signed articles do not necessarily represent the
views of EFF. To reproduce signed articles individually,
please contact the authors for their express permission.
Press releases and EFF announcements & articles may be
reproduced individually at will.
Current and back issues of EFFector are available via the
Web at:
<http://www.eff.org/effector/>
To remove yourself from this mailing, please go to http://www.kintera.org/TR.asp?ID=M6577122472096799371055
To remove yourself from all mailings from Electronic Frontier Foundation, please go to http://www.kintera.org/TR.asp?ID=M6577123472096799371055
EFFector 17.38: Indymedia Servers Mysteriously Reappear, But Questions Remain (fwd)
-
Type: discussion