#3
I Speak of Dreams [blog]
http://lizditz.typepad.com/i_speak_of_dreams/2004/03/als_awake_again.html
////
Sunday, March 28, 2004
The Pepsi Molotov Cocktail
Al's awake again. I made dinner. Then there's this:
The American artist Joy Garnett, whose paintings are derived from news
images, is faced with a legal action for thousands of dollars over this
one. This has nothing to do with the protection of livelihood and
everything to do with the suppression of free speech and free artistic
practice. Don't let the schoolyard bullies win! Show your solidarity with
Joy by grabbing this image and posting it on your website or by making
your own artwork derived from it."
(the quote is from BoingBoing, linked at the end of this post.)
The protest page is here.
This is the image in question:
<image>
I assumed that the suit was brought by Pepsi, as somehow demeaning the
brand. It wasn't.
Here's the artist's website:
the most interesting thing just happened: I'm being sued for copyright
infringement (does it mean I'm finally a grown-up?). the joke is I was
served the letter the day after I met with an arts funding rep who
encouraged me to list "sampling" on my grant application as part of my
painting practice. It made the whole thing seem almost funny.
The plaintiff is a world-famous photojournalist who takes pics in
war-torn regions; the pirated image is a detail of a photograph taken in
1978. Months back while trolling the Web for news images and such, I found
the cropped detail w/ no credit line, probably on some
anti-NAFTA/anarchist solidarity website, printed it out and stuck it in a
folder to paint later. I had no idea it was a detail of a pic by a Magnum
photographer or that it was from their most seminal series and book. The
joke is definitely on me.
Is Joy Garnett a plaigiarist? Is it "stealing" to use a figure from
another's work in your own? I'd sure like to see the original image, to
see how much Garnett changed the image. What would happen if Garnett
submitted this work for credit in a university class?
Postscript: I had first seen the image, and the controversy, from
BoingBoing's guestblogger.
Johannes Grenzfurthner is writer, artist and founding member of
Vienna/Austria based art-tech-philosophy group monochrom. monochrom is an
unpeculiar mixture of proto-aesthetic fringe work, pop attitude,
subcultural science and political activism. monochrom's mission, its
passion and quasi-ontological vocation, is primarily the collection,
grouping, registration and querying (liberation?) of the scar tissue
represented by everyday cultural artifacts.
More postscript:
The original image is here–it is huge, 70 by 60 inches. The artist has
exhibited the work at Debs & Co–here are more images. For my money, while
Garnett's work is obviously BASED on the work of others (news photographs)
they are not mere copies; the works are transformed by Garnett's craft
(the act of painting) and vision (what is emphasized, what is left out.)
Sunday, March 28, 2004 at 09:39 AM in Random Walk Thru Internet |
Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/581407
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Pepsi Molotov
Cocktail:
[…]
Joywar: endless postscripts a la RSS etc (3)
-
Type: discussion