Spoilt Princess...

You are wrong,

Rhizome has been dealing with a spoilt Princess…

not a he…

although seemingly just as autistic.

marc


> Hey man…I ain't leanin on no 'psychoanalytic crutch'…
>
> I doubt _I'm_ part of the Kandinskij phenomenon…It feels like it's one
person, but hey…gets blurry…it'd be weird if K was more people than all
of us combined! hehe… I doubt his identity is just a simple collection of
several discrete personalities either, so never mind…point is, there's
stuff here to consider, even if it isn't all sugar-coated…at least that's
what I think
>
>
> -Vijay P
>
> p.s. let's pool all of this conflict into positive energy for 2.Moksha!
…more blind hope
> …wait, all you guys may actually be contributing more than you know =)
>
> >Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2002 15:41:13 -0800 (PST)
> > "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" <[email protected]> Vijay Gorrepati
<[email protected]> Re: RHIZOME_RAW: 2Moksha 2Moksha. Let's all be victims.
> >On Sat, 7 Dec 2002, Vijay Gorrepati wrote:
> >
> >> I have no clue who "they" are. They are on the rhizome mailing list.
Ask vijay p about them, he has some interesting things to tell.
> >
> >> anyways, have fun, kman is good at telling you to stop telling people
do
> >> something.
> >
> > We are not 'telling you' to 'stop telling people to do something'.
> > Meaningless generalities do not apply to Reality.
> >
> >> and they like to
> >
> > We neither like nor dislike.
> >
> >> lean on a psychoanalytical cruch,
> >
> > We lean on no crutches, love. Nor do we engage in 'psychoanalyis'.
> > Avoid attempting to present your cultural conditioing programmatic
> > knee-jerks as what 'we' are.
> >
> >
> >> albeit not very responsibly.
> >
> > Dear, you have no understanding of responsibility.
> > You're simply throwong about verbal concepts.
> >
> >
> >> Somehow they instantly know who you are and
> >
> >
> >> WILL tell what you are doing,
> >
> > That is not what we are doing, love.
> >
> >> even if you are not, because they just know.
> >
> > Nor is the above what we are doing.
> >
> >> They also dont take responsibility in their actions
> >
> > Actually dear, we are perfectly responsible for our actions.
> >
> >> and are quick to forget them.
> >
> > Dear we do nothing of the sort.
> >
> >> Very hypocritical too.
> >
> > Nor are we hypocritical in the least.
> >
> >> APE!
> >
> > So dear, can you do anything besides project
> > standard knee-jerk attempts at insults mixed up
> > with things you perceive as 'insults' on our behalf?
>
>
>
>
> ————————————————————
> Get Your Free and Private Junglist E-mail from Junglist.com
> Register Online Here -> http://www.junglist.com
>
>
> ———————————————————————
> Express yourself with a super cool email address from BigMailBox.com.
> Hundreds of choices. It's free!
> http://www.bigmailbox.com
> ———————————————————————
> + ti esrever dna ti pilf nwod gniht ym tup
> -> post: [email protected]
> -> questions: [email protected]
> -> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
> -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
> +
> Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
> Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.php
>
>

Comments

, D42 Kandinskij

On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, marc.garrett wrote:

> Princesses need their fathers, so excuse their daddy's autism…that's all
> I'm gonna say on the matter.

Dear marc garret. You have no capacity nor authority to
'say anything on the matter'. You're a simpleton + a moron,
and a dictatorial ignorant ape who attempts to 'dress'
everyone in its own problems + 'cure' them of the latter.

Again: we are not autistic, related to your_ own_
'daddy' problem, nor female. If one wishes to see 'autism'
in action one only needs to look at marc garrett with his
psychotic failure to perceive who + what it is speaking to,
and throwing about its emotional problems on others.

What's more, mr. marc garret is attempting to 'persecute' us
because of his own problems. Additionally, marc garett does not_
wish to deal with or 'face' his own emotional problems
but rather projects them onto others and fancies that 'emotional
sharing'.

Additionally, marc garret abuses an already fallacious pseudo
scientific concept as justification of his attempts to ensnare
others into his emotional drivel.

Your emotions marc garret are your OWN problem.
Freedom from 'emotions' is not autism.

It is only simpleton idiots who advocate lack of "
emotional entanglement" as autistic, when in fact it is
the same that keeps humans lowly energetic, immature,
and incapable of communication, as well as perceiving

We suggest that you refrain from slander + psychotic
attempts at character assassinations on your idiotic behalf.

+ If you want to see a 'princess' with 'autism'
we suggest you take alook at your own 'narcissistic' persona
which fancies its problems are ours.

Moreso, we suggest avoiding to pose as authority on the
states of humans. You are not.

, marc garrett

OK,

Before I get into a trivial slanging match over nuances & fine distinctions,
subtlety of language - I was responding to your thread earlier, in respect
of identity…

but in matters of autism, it is a known fact that the male is 30% more
emotionally autistic than the female, hence thuggery. Thereare various
forms of autism as I am sure you are aware of. But just in case, here is a
link for you http://www.ont-autism.uoguelph.ca/G&M.PDF to enlighten yourself
on the global and historical, social issue of male autism, and the potential
threat that it has on humanity, larger scale.

Princesses need their fathers, so excuse their daddy's autism…that's all
I'm gonna say on the matter.

marc



> what do you mean by "spoilt," "princess," and what does it have to do with
autism?
>
> vijayp
>
> > "marc.garrett" <[email protected]> "Vijay Pattisapu"
<[email protected]>Cc: <[email protected]>
> > RHIZOME_RAW: Spoilt Princess…Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2002 17:21:02 -0000
> >Reply-To: "marc.garrett" <[email protected]>
> >
> >You are wrong,
> >
> >Rhizome has been dealing with a spoilt Princess…
> >
> >not a he…
> >
> >although seemingly just as autistic.
> >
> >marc
> >
> >
> >> Hey man…I ain't leanin on no 'psychoanalytic crutch'…
> >>
> >> I doubt _I'm_ part of the Kandinskij phenomenon…It feels like it's
one
> >person, but hey…gets blurry…it'd be weird if K was more people than
all
> >of us combined! hehe… I doubt his identity is just a simple collection
of
> >several discrete personalities either, so never mind…point is, there's
> >stuff here to consider, even if it isn't all sugar-coated…at least
that's
> >what I think
> >>
> >>
> >> -Vijay P
> >>
> >> p.s. let's pool all of this conflict into positive energy for 2.Moksha!
> >…more blind hope
> >> …wait, all you guys may actually be contributing more than you know
=)
> >>
> >> >Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2002 15:41:13 -0800 (PST)
> >> > "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" <[email protected]> Vijay Gorrepati
> ><[email protected]> Re: RHIZOME_RAW: 2Moksha 2Moksha. Let's all be victims.
> >> >On Sat, 7 Dec 2002, Vijay Gorrepati wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> I have no clue who "they" are. They are on the rhizome mailing list.
> >Ask vijay p about them, he has some interesting things to tell.
> >> >
> >> >> anyways, have fun, kman is good at telling you to stop telling
people
> >do
> >> >> something.
> >> >
> >> > We are not 'telling you' to 'stop telling people to do something'.
> >> > Meaningless generalities do not apply to Reality.
> >> >
> >> >> and they like to
> >> >
> >> > We neither like nor dislike.
> >> >
> >> >> lean on a psychoanalytical cruch,
> >> >
> >> > We lean on no crutches, love. Nor do we engage in 'psychoanalyis'.
> >> > Avoid attempting to present your cultural conditioing programmatic
> >> > knee-jerks as what 'we' are.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> albeit not very responsibly.
> >> >
> >> > Dear, you have no understanding of responsibility.
> >> > You're simply throwong about verbal concepts.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> Somehow they instantly know who you are and
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> WILL tell what you are doing,
> >> >
> >> > That is not what we are doing, love.
> >> >
> >> >> even if you are not, because they just know.
> >> >
> >> > Nor is the above what we are doing.
> >> >
> >> >> They also dont take responsibility in their actions
> >> >
> >> > Actually dear, we are perfectly responsible for our actions.
> >> >
> >> >> and are quick to forget them.
> >> >
> >> > Dear we do nothing of the sort.
> >> >
> >> >> Very hypocritical too.
> >> >
> >> > Nor are we hypocritical in the least.
> >> >
> >> >> APE!
> >> >
> >> > So dear, can you do anything besides project
> >> > standard knee-jerk attempts at insults mixed up
> >> > with things you perceive as 'insults' on our behalf?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ————————————————————
> >> Get Your Free and Private Junglist E-mail from Junglist.com
> >> Register Online Here -> http://www.junglist.com
> >>
> >>
> >> ———————————————————————
> >> Express yourself with a super cool email address from BigMailBox.com.
> >> Hundreds of choices. It's free!
> >> http://www.bigmailbox.com
> >> ———————————————————————
> >> + ti esrever dna ti pilf nwod gniht ym tup
> >> -> post: [email protected]
> >> -> questions: [email protected]
> >> -> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
> >> -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
> >> +
> >> Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
> >> Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.php
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >+ ti esrever dna ti pilf nwod gniht ym tup
> >-> post: [email protected]
> >-> questions: [email protected]
> >-> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
> >-> give: http://rhizome.org/support
> >+
> >Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
> >Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.php
>
>
>
>
> ————————————————————
> Get Your Free and Private Junglist E-mail from Junglist.com
> Register Online Here -> http://www.junglist.com
>
>
> ———————————————————————
> Express yourself with a super cool email address from BigMailBox.com.
> Hundreds of choices. It's free!
> http://www.bigmailbox.com
> ———————————————————————
>

, D42 Kandinskij

On Sun, 8 Dec 2002, marc.garrett wrote:

> Rhizome has been dealing with a spoilt Princess…
>
> not a he…

No dearest, you are dealig with a he.

> although seemingly just as autistic.

The only one autistic here is you, lovely cuckoo.