Re: TELEGRAMMAR, the plight of Sir K.

On Fri, 6 Dec 2002, josh zeidner wrote:

> Avoid seeking validation from people whom a) cannot
> validate you, b) don't give a shit about what you have
> to say.

Dear Joshua, nobody is seeking validation from anyone here.
Nor do we care whether you care or not. Besides, you are
ony speaking for yourself, spurned princessa.


> You see K., there are many, many people who do not
> fit into the obvious categories of 'those who love
> you', and 'those who hate you', there is yet a third
> hypothetical category into which most people fit:
> 'those who are not at all concerned about you'.

You see, Joshua. We have never cared for 'like' and 'dislike'.
Avoid attempting to present us as 'interested' in such drivel.

Love you're not capable of, nor do we expect it from you.

Yes, 'apathy' is the epitome of your intelligence.
Do us a favor love, if you are not concerned
(said the Joshua princessa bloating in self-importance)
don't reply?

Don't you find it odd, that you keep soliciting
yourself to us, and then trying to strike a blase
"I don't care pose"?

Understand that us depicting you does not express
any desire on our behalf towards you, and please
stop knee-jerking from your panties.

> What is funny is your psycho-melodramatic soliloquy
> in which you broadcast to the entire world your silly

Sorry dearest. We don't engage in 'psycho-melodramatic
soliloquy'. Our texts are entirely emotion and psychology free.
Nor is it a soliloquy Joshua. You're not "everybody".
There are those who listen.


> little personal shortcomings.

Sorry dearest, but we are not 'broadcasting our personal
shortcomings'. This is the unfortunate condition of
egotistical princesses like yourself.

And all of your text so far speaks only of yourself.

> what a laugh! baby wants his bottle! hahahahaha.

Yes, it's so funny isn't it? The conscious Joshua
"laughs" in egotistical condescendion.
Tsk. The baby is you, Joshua.

> your friend to the end, josh z

No dearest Joshua, you're not my friend.

You're a needy attention seeking masochist.

are you serious?

— "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+"
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Dec 2002, josh zeidner wrote:
>
> > Avoid seeking validation from people whom a)
> cannot
> > validate you, b) don't give a shit about what you
> have
> > to say.
>
> Dear Joshua, nobody is seeking validation from
> anyone here.
> Nor do we care whether you care or not. Besides,
> you are
> ony speaking for yourself, spurned princessa.
>
>
> > You see K., there are many, many people who do
> not
> > fit into the obvious categories of 'those who love
> > you', and 'those who hate you', there is yet a
> third
> > hypothetical category into which most people fit:
> > 'those who are not at all concerned about you'.
>
> You see, Joshua. We have never cared for 'like'
> and 'dislike'.
> Avoid attempting to present us as 'interested' in
> such drivel.
>
> Love you're not capable of, nor do we expect it
> from you.
>
> Yes, 'apathy' is the epitome of your intelligence.
> Do us a favor love, if you are not concerned
> (said the Joshua princessa bloating in
> self-importance)
> don't reply?
>
> Don't you find it odd, that you keep soliciting
> yourself to us, and then trying to strike a blase
> "I don't care pose"?
>
> Understand that us depicting you does not express
> any desire on our behalf towards you, and please
> stop knee-jerking from your panties.
>
> > What is funny is your psycho-melodramatic
> soliloquy
> > in which you broadcast to the entire world your
> silly
>
> Sorry dearest. We don't engage in
> 'psycho-melodramatic
> soliloquy'. Our texts are entirely emotion and
> psychology free.
> Nor is it a soliloquy Joshua. You're not
> "everybody".
> There are those who listen.
>
>
> > little personal shortcomings.
>
> Sorry dearest, but we are not 'broadcasting our
> personal
> shortcomings'. This is the unfortunate condition
> of
> egotistical princesses like yourself.
>
> And all of your text so far speaks only of
> yourself.
>
> > what a laugh! baby wants his bottle! hahahahaha.
>
> Yes, it's so funny isn't it? The conscious Joshua
> "laughs" in egotistical condescendion.
> Tsk. The baby is you, Joshua.
>
> > your friend to the end, josh z
>
> No dearest Joshua, you're not my friend.
>
> You're a needy attention seeking masochist.
>
>


__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com

On Fri, 6 Dec 2002, josh zeidner wrote:

> are you serious?

Are you?