Very Applicable to Max Herman's commentary about the 'ways of
controlling people'.. and his pathetic scum attempting to keep
people on their 'ego-leashes' crap.
The portrait of the two maids is you.
Consciousness does not include in ANY form sadism,
control of people, leading people around by their ego leashes,
abusing the fact that they have egos–as you attempt continuously,
with your drivel commentaries about various issues that you KNOW
they'd knee-jerk about (war etc.) and continuous attempts at sadistic
abuse which you attempt to claim are 'intended'.
They are not. They're not INTENDED. They are not 'clever'
and you're not conscious. Hideous raggedy doll.
Last but not least, unlike Joseph McElroy who 'looks for weaknesses'
in humans and attempts to feed on their energy through those 'with a
smile & a sense of humor,' you keep nodding and wagging your tail
pretending to 'agree'–but dearest NN is narcissistic + lacks real
understanding of things, notI. Your verbal noise-mimicry is not
impressive.
Your alternating sadism / masochism is sickening.
In his next play; The Maids, Genet portrays a ritualistic act of two maids
who take turns acting as "Madame," abusing each other as either servant or
employer. The ceremony reveals not only the maids' hatred of the Madame's
authority, but also their hatred of themselves for participating in the
hierarchy that oppresses them.
You love your ego, yes. More than consciousness.
More than freedom. More than yourself.
More than anything in fact.
Mrrawr. Tell us again how salvation is damnation?
Honey honey, don'tcha know about luv?
Some people live + die like dogs.
Powerless peasant slug, who thinks 'cleverness' and folkish 'wisdom' will
get him somewhere.
`, . ` `k a r e i' ? ' D42
G2K revolution
-
Type: discussion
Comments
Quoting "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" <[email protected]>:
> On Sun, 13 Oct 2002 [email protected] wrote:
>
> > No ego, no irony. Why keep the anger?
>
> What anger you idiot?
>
> Only the paranoid confuse the .. with anger.
>
> Fill in the dots.
>
>
I have found something sad that is amusing. If you would just release the
clench in your mind and fist…you are not as strong as you think nor as weak
as you fear.
Joseph
Quoting "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" <[email protected]>:
> Last but not least, unlike Joseph McElroy who 'looks for weaknesses'
> in humans and attempts to feed on their energy through those 'with a
> smile & a sense of humor,' you keep nodding and wagging your tail
> pretending to 'agree'–but dearest NN is narcissistic + lacks real
> understanding of things, notI. Your verbal noise-mimicry is not
> impressive.
I think I am supposed to respond. But I know I won't.
Joseph
On Sun, 13 Oct 2002 [email protected] wrote:
> I think I am supposed to respond.
Dog impulse.
> But I know I won't.
You just did. Aie!
Asleep as a dead log.
With an imploding ego to boot.
Ew.
> Respond to me.
>
> Joseph
Eh bien? And now what?
This is that n'est pas?
Just like. Just like.
Quoting "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" <[email protected]>:
> > Respond to me.
> >
> > Joseph
>
> Eh bien? And now what?
>
> This is that n'est pas?
>
> Just like. Just like.
No ego, no irony. Why keep the anger?
Joseph
On Sun, 13 Oct 2002 [email protected] wrote:
> No ego, no irony. Why keep the anger?
What anger you idiot?
Only the paranoid confuse the .. with anger.
Fill in the dots.
`, . ` `k a r e i' ? ' D42
On Sun, 13 Oct 2002 [email protected] wrote:
> I have found something sad that is amusing.
There is nothing 'sad that is amusing'.
This is your own self-importance grimacing.
> If you would just release the clench in your mind and fist..
There is no 'clench in my mind any my fist' dearest.
Besides in your murderous ego driven imagination.
> you are not as strong as you think
I do not think my dearest. And I am incredibly strong.
Keep your idiotic projections to yourself, as well as
your idiotic impulses to debase other beings.
> nor as weak as you fear.
Laughable + idiotic. Go play dokteur elsewhere monkey.
There is no fear besides in your wishful imagination,
and I have very little appreciation for yourmurderous
push-buttonimpulse tricks.
Idiotically enough you project machoism
on the word strength (your own personal problem)
andproceed to attempt 'curing'.
Butchering farmer-ape.
`, . ` `k a r e i' ? ' D42
Quoting "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" <[email protected]>:
> On Sun, 13 Oct 2002 [email protected] wrote:
>
> > I have found something sad that is amusing.
>
> There is nothing 'sad that is amusing'.
> This is your own self-importance grimacing.
There is no 'self-importance grimacing'.
This is your own self-importance grimancing.
>
> > If you would just release the clench in your mind and fist..
>
> There is no 'clench in my mind any my fist' dearest.
> Besides in your murderous ego driven imagination.
There is no 'murderous ego driven imagination.
Besides in your murderous ego driven imagination.
>
> > you are not as strong as you think
>
> I do not think my dearest. And I am incredibly strong.
> Keep your idiotic projections to yourself, as well as
> your idiotic impulses to debase other beings.
I do not project dearest. And I am incredibly strong.
Keep your idiotic thinking to yourself, as well as your
idiotic impulses to debase other beings.
>
> > nor as weak as you fear.
>
> Laughable + idiotic. Go play dokteur elsewhere monkey.
> There is no fear besides in your wishful imagination,
> and I have very little appreciation for yourmurderous
> push-buttonimpulse tricks.
Idiotic and laughable. Go play doktuer elsewhere monkey.
There is no appreciation besides in your wishful imagination,
and I have very little fear of your murderous
push-buttonimpulse tricks.
>
> Idiotically enough you project machoism
> on the word strength (your own personal problem)
> andproceed to attempt 'curing'.
Macho enough, you project idiocy
on the word strength ( your own personal problem)
and proceed to attempt 'curing'.
>
> Butchering farmer-ape.
>
Farmer Butchering-ape.
RESPOND TO ME!
Joseph
On Sun, 13 Oct 2002 [email protected] wrote:
> There is no 'self-importance grimacing'.
> This is your own self-importance grimancing.
No dearest. You're talking about yourself. :)
> There is no 'murderous ego driven imagination.
> Besides in your murderous ego driven imagination.
Monkey mimicry is not mirroring luv.
Finger pointing isn't either.
Can't break out of your self-reflection?
> RESPOND TO ME!
Hghasgdhsg ? Copying is not mirroring :)
`, . ` `k a r e i' ? ' D42
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Eryk Salvaggio wrote:
> There's a weird ebb and flow to it, like the fish in a school changing
> direction. Or how birds will make weird loop-de-loops in the air.
No there isn't. A bunch of flowery empty 'poetic' metaphors
with no correspondence to reality.
> It's really fascinating to watch how weird people will act on a mailing list
> for the benefit of some unknown prize.
That's not what's going on Eryk.
As usual you have some flowery delusions in your head
and you fancy those insightful.
> Tonight I could just watch the flow of mails to my inbox,
> I didn't even have to read them. I just wonder what happens
> to make them stop;
I made them syop. You missed it. But if you read, you'd notice.
> apparently everyone falls asleep,
> or passes out? And then it doesn't start up again for a few days.
>
> Like that stereolab song, "In another world it'd be funny."
Drivel. But of course, you're posing for the prise yourself.
You just do it from the sidewalk.
Take your self-important ego-bloating pity elsewhere, baby.
Quoting Eryk Salvaggio <[email protected]>:
> There's a weird ebb and flow to it, like the fish in a school changing
> direction. Or how birds will make weird loop-de-loops in the air. It's
> really fascinating to watch how weird people will act on a mailing list
> for the benefit of some unknown prize. Tonight I could just watch the
> flow of mails to my inbox, I didn't even have to read them. I just
> wonder what happens to make them stop; apparently everyone falls asleep,
> or passes out? And then it doesn't start up again for a few days.
>
> Like that stereolab song, "In another world it'd be funny."
It's a bedtime story, right before the dog is put outside for the night.
Joseph
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002 [email protected] wrote:
> It's a bedtime story, right before the dog is put outside for the night.
O oo. The murderous idiotic ape thinks its brain-created fantasies
are reflective of Reality.
Tell usa gain how all is relative, ego-twit? :)
`, . ` `k a r e i' ? ' D42
Quoting "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" <[email protected]>:
> On Mon, 14 Oct 2002 [email protected] wrote:
>
> > It's a bedtime story, right before the dog is put outside for the night.
>
> O oo. The murderous idiotic ape thinks its brain-created fantasies
> are reflective of Reality.
>
> Tell usa gain how all is relative, ego-twit? :)
>
I didn't say all is relative. You just do not understand me.
RESPOND TO ME.
Joseph
Wow this is pretty fascinating. Almost like the games those writer guys
used to play … Samuel something.
You know, they would sit around in manors, drinking tea and eating
cucumber sandwiches, ruminating upon the world, philosophy and esoteria.
Playing language games. All that comes to mind is fat and gout.
Hmm.
—–Original Message—–
From: -IID42 Kandinskij @27+ [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, 14 October 2002 2:09 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: RHIZOME_RAW: Re: [thingist] G2K revolution
On Sun, 13 Oct 2002 [email protected] wrote:
> There is no 'self-importance grimacing'.
> This is your own self-importance grimancing.
No dearest. You're talking about yourself. :)
> There is no 'murderous ego driven imagination.
> Besides in your murderous ego driven imagination.
Monkey mimicry is not mirroring luv.
Finger pointing isn't either.
Can't break out of your self-reflection?
> RESPOND TO ME!
Hghasgdhsg ? Copying is not mirroring :)
`, . ` `k a r e i' ? ' D42
+ tripe
************************************************************************
WARNING: The information contained in this email may be confidential.
If you are not the intended recipient, any use or copying of any part
of this information is unauthorised. If you have received this email in
error, we apologise for any inconvenience and request that you notify
the sender immediately and delete all copies of this email, together
with any attachments.
************************************************************************
There's a weird ebb and flow to it, like the fish in a school changing
direction. Or how birds will make weird loop-de-loops in the air. It's
really fascinating to watch how weird people will act on a mailing list
for the benefit of some unknown prize. Tonight I could just watch the
flow of mails to my inbox, I didn't even have to read them. I just
wonder what happens to make them stop; apparently everyone falls asleep,
or passes out? And then it doesn't start up again for a few days.
Like that stereolab song, "In another world it'd be funny."
-e.
Darren Smith wrote:
>Wow this is pretty fascinating. Almost like the games those writer guys
>used to play … Samuel something.
>
>You know, they would sit around in manors, drinking tea and eating
>cucumber sandwiches, ruminating upon the world, philosophy and esoteria.
>Playing language games. All that comes to mind is fat and gout.
>
>Hmm.
>
>—–Original Message—–
>From: -IID42 Kandinskij @27+ [mailto:[email protected]]
>Sent: Monday, 14 October 2002 2:09 PM
>To: [email protected]
>Cc: [email protected]
>Subject: RHIZOME_RAW: Re: [thingist] G2K revolution
>
>
>On Sun, 13 Oct 2002 [email protected] wrote:
>
>>There is no 'self-importance grimacing'.
>>This is your own self-importance grimancing.
>>
>
> No dearest. You're talking about yourself. :)
>
>>There is no 'murderous ego driven imagination.
>>Besides in your murderous ego driven imagination.
>>
>
> Monkey mimicry is not mirroring luv.
> Finger pointing isn't either.
>
> Can't break out of your self-reflection?
>
>>RESPOND TO ME!
>>
>
> Hghasgdhsg ? Copying is not mirroring :)
>
>`, . ` `k a r e i' ? ' D42
>
>+ tripe
>
>
>
>************************************************************************
>WARNING: The information contained in this email may be confidential.
>If you are not the intended recipient, any use or copying of any part
>of this information is unauthorised. If you have received this email in
>error, we apologise for any inconvenience and request that you notify
>the sender immediately and delete all copies of this email, together
>with any attachments.
>************************************************************************
>+ tripe
>
>
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Darren Smith wrote:
> Wow this is pretty fascinating. Almost like the games those writer guys
> used to play … Samuel something.
Not even remotely.
> You know, they would sit around in manors, drinking tea and eating
> cucumber sandwiches, ruminating upon the world, philosophy and esoteria.
> Playing language games.
There are no language games, besides Max + Joseph's.
> All that comes to mind is fat and gout.
xoxo
-IID42 Kandinskij @27+ wrote:
>On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Eryk Salvaggio wrote:
>
>>There's a weird ebb and flow to it, like the fish in a school changing
>>direction. Or how birds will make weird loop-de-loops in the air.
>>
>
> No there isn't.
>
Oh, really? You should try looking at things from outside of your inbox
sometime. The way the email arrived last night was very much like I
described, circular threads weaving in and out of each other. There's
nothing poetic about that description, no metaphors this time.
>A bunch of flowery empty 'poetic' metaphors
> with no correspondence to reality.
>
You disappoint me consistently. For all your posing your limitations are
extremely evident; and if you admitted them you'd be far more
interesting. For example, denying that the discussion had an ebb and
flow makes me think you weren't looking.
>It's really fascinating to watch how weird people will act on a mailing list
>for the benefit of some unknown prize.
>
>
> That's not what's going on Eryk.
>
When people on public forums comment to one another over the course of
[was it 134?] emails in the span of six hours, I very much think that
there is some weird behavior going on. And the fact that these
slam-matches occur in public is revealing too. Someone wants to "prove."
I don't think it's Kandinskij, but your perpetuation of this stuff is
pitiable.
>
> As usual you have some flowery delusions in your head
> and you fancy those insightful.
>
Yeah, I think so too.
>I made them stop. You missed it. But if you read, you'd notice.
>
Haha. Right. You made them stop, and so did McElroy, and so did Max by
going to bed. I guess you all won.
>Like that stereolab song, "In another world it'd be funny."
>
>
> Drivel. But of course, you're posing for the prise yourself.
> You just do it from the sidewalk.
>
I already have my prize. It's the sidewalk. :)
-e.
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Eryk Salvaggio wrote:
> Oh, really? You should try looking at things from outside of your inbox
> sometime.
I am not looking at things from 'inside my inbox'.
> The way the email arrived last night was very much like I
> described,
No, it wasn't. Your delusional cut out brain mirage
are not at all reflective of reality.
> circular threads weaving in and out of each other. There's
> nothing poetic about that description, no metaphors this time.
It's still inaccurate. The prior description was poetic.
> You disappoint me consistently.
You who dearest? The idiotic asleep self-important ignorant ego-ape?
> For all your posing
The only one here posing is you baby.
> your limitations are extremely evident;
Delusional drivel.
> and if you admitted them you'd be far more interesting.
Yes, if I identified myself with the wishful debasing
projections in your brain 'I'd be far more interesting'.
The world revolves around Eryk's penis and what it finds 'interesting'.
> For example, denying that the discussion had an ebb and
> flow makes me think you weren't looking.
That is your own personal problem. The discussion had no 'ebb and flow'.
The only thing occurring is that I am not confirming your delusional
myopic misinterpretation. That is all.
> When people on public forums comment to one another over the course of
> [was it 134?] emails in the span of six hours, I very much think that
> there is some weird behavior going on.
You can't think. Idiot.
> And the fact that these slam-matches
These are not 'slam-matches'.
Your wishful delusional interpretation does not
reflect reality.
> occur in public is revealing too.
Nothing is revealing except for your own e-mail revealing
your own revolting ego.
> Someone wants to "prove."
Shrug.
> I don't think it's Kandinskij, but your perpetuation of this stuff is
> pitiable.
No, it isn't. Pity my dearest is the flip-side of your self-importance.
You know what to do with your ego: don't wag it in my direction.
> > As usual you have some flowery delusions in your head
> > and you fancy those insightful.
> >
>
> Yeah, I think so too.
You cam't think.
> Haha. Right. You made them stop, and so did McElroy, and so did Max by
> going to bed. I guess you all won.
Hm. Nothing to do with 'winning'.
Nor is this what occurred. max was stopped long before 'he went to bed'.
More myopic 'insights'.
> >Like that stereolab song, "In another world it'd be funny."
> >
> >
> > Drivel. But of course, you're posing for the prise yourself.
> > You just do it from the sidewalk.
> >
>
> I already have my prize. It's the sidewalk. :)
Well, I guess you 'won'.
Regardless, what you write is meaningless.
Try again.
Poetry is not splattering random flowery 'observations' on the wall.
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002 [email protected] wrote:
> I didn't say all is relative.
Of course not.
> You just do not understand me.
There is nothing to understand.