G2K typo: Re: review: Geert Lovink

Um so the typo was that G2K is earlier, more original, better, and less
mistakes than Geert Lovink's Dark Fibre not Lev Manovich's Dark Fibre.

NN used to say all the time what a jerkoff Lovink is, so Karei, as a tester,
do you care to say if Lovink is a jerkoff?


>From: ryan griffis <[email protected]>
>Reply-To: ryan griffis <[email protected]>
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: RHIZOME\_RAW: Re: review: Geert Lovink
>Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 15:24:45 -0400
>
> >
>Being a fan of nettime and Geert Lovink's other work (with my limited
>exposure to it), i really appreciate McKenzie Wark's review of Dark Fiber.
>there certainly needs to be some kind of sustained attention on the
>critical work that's being done (tactical media), for the purposes of both
>current development and archive. however, i am always troubled somewhat by
>the direction of so much of the discourse - discussing the internal logic
>of the technology and it's implications for action. i know that the
>technology effects the forms of action available, but it seems too easy to
>naturalize the process and neglect other practices that may be less
>"sophisticated" in terms of technics - i.e. less important in the
>"progress" of media technologies. at least i know i do this.
>anyway, i got alot from the review, thanks.
>best,
>ryan
>+ une dans la gueule, and two for tea !
>-> post: [email protected]
>-> questions: [email protected]
>-> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
>-> give: http://rhizome.org/support
>+
>Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
>Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.php




\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
Join the world's largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
http://www.hotmail.com