Kadinskij as Still Born Still Life

On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Wally Keeler wrote:

> I

=ego

> I am


No, you aren't. You are nothing.

> I am human

Meaningless.

> I am a human

Meaningless.

> I AM NOT A UNIT

You are.

> I am a human being

You are not.

> I AM NOT A DIGIT

Yes, you are. To make matters even worse, you don't even understand
'digits'. The core of your being is a 'name' or a 'digit' which if
resonated can kill you–aren't you familiar with sonic weapons
and kiai?

> I am a human being being

No, you aren't. And you're not important either.
You can froth as you please, but until you awake to your potential,
as a Being (nothing to do with human) you're an animal. Unit.

> I AM NOT A NUMBER

Yes, you are.

> I am a human being being human

Nein.

> I am

The grand illusion of 'languij'.
No, you 'aren't.' Being capable of typing I am, doesn't mean
you are, no more than writing 'I am free' makes you free.


> I see

Tell me another joke.

> I hear
>
> I feel
>
> I smell
>
> I taste


You identify with the lower sensorial functions, unit.

> I intuit

ha ha. Not even close. You knee-jerk to impulses you don't understand
and fancy that as intuition.

> I AM EVERYTHING THAT DOES NOT FIT DATA FLOWCHARTS

You fit data charts quite nicely. Stomp your little foot if ya like.
We got a chart for that too.


> I AM EVERYTHING THAT DOES NOT FIT INHUMAN RESOURCES

What a joke. The world (universe) is inhuman.
If you want to stop being an animal-unit, you have to give up
your 'humanity'.

> I AM EVERYTHING THAT DOES NOT FIT IN TRIPLICATE FORM

You must be so free.

> I AM EVERYTHING THAT DOES NOT FIT THE FOR-OFFICE-USE-LONELY BOX

SHRIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEK.
The unit is screaching.

> I am unfit

Go stab yourself.

> I am a misfit

A real rebel-slave. Doesn't fit in Rime, baa. wants a curcifiction, baa.

> I AM NOT A RE-FIT

You are. All humans are cast out of the 'human mould'.

> I am a human being being human being human
>

A human ANIMAL: Beings do not have the characteristic 'human'.

> I BENDFOLDSPINDLE& …
>
> I BENDFOLDSPINDLE & burp
>
> I BENDFOLD SPINDLE & bleed
>
> I BEND FOLD SPINDLE & breathe

Animal-unit.

> I love
>
You knee-jerk to reproductive impulses.

> I make xove
>
> I make much xxve
>
> I xxxe to make xxxx

You fuck, like all animals do.


> This is where I fit firm
>
> This is where I am human
>
> This is my original sin


Right. Programmed with 'original sins' too.

> I am not UNORIGINAL SIN*
>
> I am a human being being human being human being human being


No such thing baby. Snap snap. It's a chimera.

As is your 'righteous' posing against 'numbers'.

On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Wally Keeler wrote:


Oh and by the way–avoid attempting to present your myopic delusions as
anything pertaining to me, k, luv?

Later.

There is no race for superiority in an indifferent world.


—– Original Message —–
From: "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" <[email protected]>
To: "Wally Keeler" <[email protected]>
Cc: "Joseph Franklyn McElroy Cor[porat]e [Per]form[ance] Art[ist]"
<[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 10:11 AM
Subject: RHIZOME_RAW: Re: Kadinskij as Still Born Still Life


> On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Wally Keeler wrote:
>
> > I
>
> =ego
>
> > I am
>
>
> No, you aren't. You are nothing.
>
> > I am human
>
> Meaningless.
>
> > I am a human
>
> Meaningless.
>
> > I AM NOT A UNIT
>
> You are.
>
> > I am a human being
>
> You are not.
>
> > I AM NOT A DIGIT
>
> Yes, you are. To make matters even worse, you don't even understand
> 'digits'. The core of your being is a 'name' or a 'digit' which if
> resonated can kill you–aren't you familiar with sonic weapons
> and kiai?
>
> > I am a human being being
>
> No, you aren't. And you're not important either.
> You can froth as you please, but until you awake to your potential,
> as a Being (nothing to do with human) you're an animal. Unit.
>
> > I AM NOT A NUMBER
>
> Yes, you are.
>
> > I am a human being being human
>
> Nein.
>
> > I am
>
> The grand illusion of 'languij'.
> No, you 'aren't.' Being capable of typing I am, doesn't mean
> you are, no more than writing 'I am free' makes you free.
>
>
> > I see
>
> Tell me another joke.
>
> > I hear
> >
> > I feel
> >
> > I smell
> >
> > I taste
>
>
> You identify with the lower sensorial functions, unit.
>
> > I intuit
>
> ha ha. Not even close. You knee-jerk to impulses you don't understand
> and fancy that as intuition.
>
> > I AM EVERYTHING THAT DOES NOT FIT DATA FLOWCHARTS
>
> You fit data charts quite nicely. Stomp your little foot if ya like.
> We got a chart for that too.
>
>
> > I AM EVERYTHING THAT DOES NOT FIT INHUMAN RESOURCES
>
> What a joke. The world (universe) is inhuman.
> If you want to stop being an animal-unit, you have to give up
> your 'humanity'.
>
> > I AM EVERYTHING THAT DOES NOT FIT IN TRIPLICATE FORM
>
> You must be so free.
>
> > I AM EVERYTHING THAT DOES NOT FIT THE FOR-OFFICE-USE-LONELY BOX
>
> SHRIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEK.
> The unit is screaching.
>
> > I am unfit
>
> Go stab yourself.
>
> > I am a misfit
>
> A real rebel-slave. Doesn't fit in Rime, baa. wants a curcifiction, baa.
>
> > I AM NOT A RE-FIT
>
> You are. All humans are cast out of the 'human mould'.
>
> > I am a human being being human being human
> >
>
> A human ANIMAL: Beings do not have the characteristic 'human'.
>
> > I BENDFOLDSPINDLE& …
> >
> > I BENDFOLDSPINDLE & burp
> >
> > I BENDFOLD SPINDLE & bleed
> >
> > I BEND FOLD SPINDLE & breathe
>
> Animal-unit.
>
> > I love
> >
> You knee-jerk to reproductive impulses.
>
> > I make xove
> >
> > I make much xxve
> >
> > I xxxe to make xxxx
>
> You fuck, like all animals do.
>
>
> > This is where I fit firm
> >
> > This is where I am human
> >
> > This is my original sin
>
>
> Right. Programmed with 'original sins' too.
>
> > I am not UNORIGINAL SIN*
> >
> > I am a human being being human being human being human being
>
>
> No such thing baby. Snap snap. It's a chimera.
>
> As is your 'righteous' posing against 'numbers'.
>
>
>
> + une dans la gueule, and two for tea !
> -> post: [email protected]
> -> questions: [email protected]
> -> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
> -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
> +
> Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
> Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.php

On Fri, 20 Sep 2002, Matthew Bradwell wrote:

> There is no race for superiority in an indifferent world.

Indifference (apathy) is an error of the ego.
I could dig out something apropos if you like:
the 'traps' of pseudo-Zen practicioners (if you're
interested).

Superiority–like value–is not a matter of competition,
nor of comparison (setting off of one against others).

The observation of superiority without comparison,
without condescension, without debasement, of
self-evident value is divine glory absolut.

Hence the angels sing.

Superiority is a function of Being. And this only.
The more superior–the more work it carries out.

The more work, the more bliss, the more intelligoodness (proper),
the more beauty. And hence the angels sing.

"-IID42 Kandinskij @27+"
> On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Wally Keeler wrote:
>
> > I
>
> =ego

Finally, you got something right.

> > I am
>
>
> No, you aren't. You are nothing.

In your estimation, however, your estimation is irrelevent to me.

> > I am human
>
> Meaningless.

I am sure it is meaningless to you.

> > I am a human
>
> Meaningless.

ditto

> > I AM NOT A UNIT
>
> You are.

Only in the circles and squares of bureaucrazy.

> > I am a human being
>
> You are not.

In your estimation, however, your estimation is irrelevent to me.

> > I AM NOT A DIGIT

> Yes, you are. To make matters even worse, you don't even understand
> 'digits'. The core of your being is a 'name' or a 'digit' which if
> resonated can kill you–aren't you familiar with sonic weapons
> and kiai?

NAMBER

======



This multi-mediocre ogre artcraft is a sturdy and verse-a-tile killer of the

central tenents of Poetry. It operates on the de(con)structivist de-moraliz=
ing

megamorphing maximizing principles of optimum bureau crazy.







name NUMBER —————

nameNUMBER

DATADATADATADATADATADAT<namNUMBER

naNUMBER ———-

nNuMBER

NAMBER ————

NAMBR NAMBR NAMBR NAMBR ===========
======

NAMBER

nNuMBER ————-

naNUMBER

DATADATADATADATADATADAT<namNUMBER

nameNUMBER ——— /

name NUMBER //

banal



=


/

/

//

banal





/

/

//

//

banal

"-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" <[email protected]>

> > I am a human being being
>
> No, you aren't. And you're not important either.

In that regard we share a lot.

> You can froth as you please, but until you awake to your potential,
> as a Being (nothing to do with human) you're an animal. Unit.

I will do what ever I please. It has always been that way with me. I am qui=
te awake, in spite of your presumptions otherwise.

>
> > I AM NOT A NUMBER
>
> Yes, you are.

Only in the circles and squares of bureaucrazy.

> > I am a human being being human
>
> Nein.

Egan!

> > I am
>
> The grand illusion of 'languij'.
> No, you 'aren't.' Being capable of typing I am, doesn't mean
> you are, no more than writing 'I am free' makes you free.

Nevertheless, here I am.

> > I see
>
> Tell me another joke.

No foolin'

> > I hear
> >
> > I feel
> >
> > I smell
> >
> > I taste
>
> You identify with the lower sensorial functions, unit.

Not only do I identify with them, I grovel in them, indulge them, satiate t=
hem, feed them — and it feeeeeels good.
So shove that up your for-orifice-use-lonely box.

> > I intuit
>
> ha ha. Not even close. You knee-jerk to impulses you don't understand
> and fancy that as intuition.

So saith you, however, I know that you know next-to-nothing about my impuls=
es, but you will come to learn more – just keep paying attention to me as =
you have been.

> > I AM EVERYTHING THAT DOES NOT FIT DATA FLOWCHARTS
>
> You fit data charts quite nicely. Stomp your little foot if ya like.
> We got a chart for that too.

Only in the circles and squares of bureaucrazy.

> > I AM EVERYTHING THAT DOES NOT FIT INHUMAN RESOURCES
>
> What a joke. The world (universe) is inhuman.

I am a unit of verse in the UnitVerse.

> If you want to stop being an animal-unit, you have to give up
> your 'humanity'.

I have no desire nor intention of giving it up. I like it. It feeeeeels goo=
d.

> > I AM EVERYTHING THAT DOES NOT FIT IN TRIPLICATE FORM
>
> You must be so free.

I feeeeeel so.

> > I AM EVERYTHING THAT DOES NOT FIT THE FOR-OFFICE-USE-LONELY BOX
>
> SHRIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEK.

You're catching on.

> The unit is screaching.

The shriek is yours, not mine.

> > I am unfit
>
> Go stab yourself.

Make me, oh impoetent one.

> > I am a misfit
>
> A real rebel-slave. Doesn't fit in Rime, baa. wants a curcifiction, baa.

You have no idea what I want – it is only another presumption on your part.

> > I AM NOT A RE-FIT
>
> You are. All humans are cast out of the 'human mould'.

Speak for yourself. The only people who presume to speak for "All humans" a=
re the likes of Stalin.

> > I am a human being being human being human
> >
>
> A human ANIMAL: Beings do not have the characteristic 'human'.

I do, whether you like it or not, and whether you agree or not; you are not=
the final arbiter of truth.

> > I BENDFOLDSPINDLE& …
> >
> > I BENDFOLDSPINDLE & burp
> >
> > I BENDFOLD SPINDLE & bleed
> >
> > I BEND FOLD SPINDLE & breathe
>
> Animal-unit.

Only in the circles and squares of bureaucrazy.

> > I love
> >
> You knee-jerk to reproductive impulses.

I sure do. I've enjoyed all those inflationary reproductive impulses. And I=
haven't been alone in the enjoyment.

> > I make xove
> >
> > I make much xxve
> >
> > I xxxe to make xxxx
>
> You fuck, like all animals do.

Of course I have fucked, and will fuck also, but I have also made xove, etc.

> > This is where I fit firm
> >
> > This is where I am human
> >
> > This is my original sin
>
> Right. Programmed with 'original sins' too.

I've enjoyed those particular programs immensely.

> > I am not UNORIGINAL SIN*
> >
> > I am a human being being human being human being human being
>
>
> No such thing baby. Snap snap. It's a chimera.
>
> As is your 'righteous' posing against 'numbers'.

Another erroneous presumption.

On Fri, 20 Sep 2002, Wally Keeler wrote:

> Finally, you got something right.

No, baby. Been right all along.

> > No, you aren't. You are nothing.
>
> In your estimation, however, your estimation is irrelevent to me.


No dear. Not in 'my estimation'.
This is your objective state.

> > > I am human
> >
> > Meaningless.
>
> I am sure it is meaningless to you.

No, baby. This is not 'about me'.
I am not expressing myself–and my opinions.
Even though that's the only sort of communication
available to children like yourself, I am not you.

What you say is–objectively meaningless.
If I died tomorrow, it'll still be true.

> > > I am a human
> >
> > Meaningless.
>
> ditto

No baby. No 'ditto'.

> > > I AM NOT A UNIT
> >
> > You are.
>
> Only in the circles and squares of bureaucrazy.

Not at all. Idiotic knee-jerk.


> > > I am a human being
> >
> > You are not.
>
> In your estimation, however, your estimation is irrelevent to me.

As above.

Rest of meaningless drivel and sniveling posturing snipped.

On Fri, 20 Sep 2002, -IID42 Kandinskij @27+ wrote:

Hey wally, I think you should allow me to come over to your house,
take what I like, break what I don't, rape your wife /girlfriend,
and shoot you in the crotch–and don't you even dare about telling
me not to do it–you'll be giving me orders.

Primitive murderous ape.

Until you learn to behave yourself consciously,
you're going to have to follow orders babe.

Unless you want to end up in jail or on the electric hair.

Get it into your pathetic skull: other people's beings do not
belong to you, nor are they subject to being crippled by
'forceful' attempts to mis-represent them as whatever
derogatory fantasy you might be coming up to due to sheer
fear and sexual ineptitude.



`, . ` `k a r e i' ? ' D42

—– Original Message —–
From: "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" <[email protected]>
> On Fri, 20 Sep 2002, -IID42 Kandinskij @27+ wrote:
> Hey wally, I think you should allow me to come over to your house,
> take what I like, break what I don't, rape your wife /girlfriend,
> and shoot you in the crotch–and don't you even dare about telling
> me not to do it–you'll be giving me orders.

Look me up and make your best attempt. It'll be interesting to see who makes
it out the door alive.

> Primitive murderous ape.

Yes.

> Until you learn to behave yourself consciously,
> you're going to have to follow orders babe.

I behave my own conscience and I don't take orders.

> Unless you want to end up in jail or on the electric hair.

My destiny will be otherwise.

> Get it into your pathetic skull: other people's beings do not
> belong to you,

As I have already told you; I don't want the responsibility of anyone else's
being belonging to me

> nor are they subject to being crippled by
> 'forceful' attempts to mis-represent them as whatever
> derogatory fantasy you might be coming up to due to sheer
> fear and sexual ineptitude.

Sexual ineptitude is another erroneous presumption. I prefer the appraisal
of those other primitive murderous apes with whom I have shared sex – felt
so good.

On Fri, 20 Sep 2002, Wally Keeler wrote:

> Look me up and make your best attempt. It'll be interesting to see who makes
> it out the door alive.

Aw look. The bravado of the murderous ape.

> > Primitive murderous ape.
>
> Yes.

—– Original Message —–
From: "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" <[email protected]>
To: "Wally Keeler" <[email protected]>
Cc: "Joseph Franklyn McElroy Cor[porat]e [Per]form[ance] Art[ist]"
<[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 10:18 PM
Subject: Re: RHIZOME_RAW: Re: Kadinskij as Still Born Still Life


> On Fri, 20 Sep 2002, Wally Keeler wrote:
>
> > Look me up and make your best attempt. It'll be interesting to see who
makes
> > it out the door alive.
>
> Aw look. The bravado of the murderous ape.

Of course. So look me up and do what you say you can do.

> > > Primitive murderous ape.
> >
> > Yes.
>
>

On Fri, 20 Sep 2002, Wally Keeler wrote:

> > Aw look. The bravado of the murderous ape.
>
> Of course. So look me up and do what you say you can do.

I didn't say what you are implying that I did.
I do not engage in murder: you'll simply self-destruct.
Illiterate ape.

> > You are nothing but a set of behavioral orders.
>
> Nope.

Yep.

> > You have no destiny.
>
> My destiny will be shaped largely by myself.

You have no destiny, nor can you 'shape' anything.
You're a monkey repeating meaningless slogans.

> Bullshit. I have simply asserted my life.

You haven't. You're dead.

> You have been ascribing all sorts
> of erroneous presumptions about my life.

I haven't ascribed anything. Repeating words I use
isn't going to give you automatic understanding.
There haven't been any presumptions nor errors
about your 'life'. Simply unpleasant truths which you don't
like hearing.


> > > Sexual ineptitude is another erroneous presumption.
> >
> > It's neither a presumtion, nor is it erroneous.
>
> It is.

Nope. Nor do you have the ability to discern such matters.

> > This is not sexual ability or maturity.
>
> What a bore you must be with your clothes off.

What I am with 'my clothes off' is none of your
business. Keep your idiotic energy draining immature ape-dick
to yourself, baby.


`, . ` `k a r e i' ? ' D42

On Fri, 20 Sep 2002, Wally Keeler avg. Rhizomer age.negativ
impotently drooled over his keyboard:

> But I have.

Delusion.

> > > No it isn't.
> >
> > Yep it is. Come on–stomp your foot–in dogmatic denial.
>
> Still in lower-case.

Literalistic ape.

> Forget about the "us" part. Speak for yourself.

Twit. The 'us' does not refer to you and I.

> > No, you don't. You cannot 'regard'.
>
> I can regard and do so.

No you cannot. The only thing you can do is language
I can regard. I do regard. There is no link to actual capability.
That you can shift words around is obvious–and largely stupid +

> Yep, there is a difference. That it escapes you doesn't surprise me.

No there isn't. The blind ape pretends there is depth to its story.

> > Sorry, I am not a dumbbell.
>
> My opinion of you.

Worth zero.

> > No, I don't. Your intent was quite patent.
> > Your 'wrapping' interests me not.
>
> You need literacy help.

Rather the opposite: you do.
I have no need to be crippled and debased to a flat, literal
brain-obsessed ape like yourself.

> > Unlike you, I can read.
>
> When will that be demonstrated?

It is pathently obvious to those who are not illiterate.
You're not one of them.
And to your 'ego' nothing will be demonstrated.
Go play your own game baby.
And grow up: nobody else besides you is to play it.


`, . ` `k a r e i' ? ' D42