"-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" <[email protected]>
> Joseph Franklyn McElroy Cor[porat]e [Per]form[ance] Art[ist] wrote:
> > You are not correct, I am perhaps peddling myself as an artist and
> > peddling my
> > art services or experiences, but not anyTHING as art.
>
> You and your 'services' are 'things'. This is inappropriately flat.
Joseph Franklyn McElroy is a human being. Human beings are not 'things' to
other human beings, with the exclusion of socio/psychopaths: eg. Stalin,
Hitler, et al who regarded human beings as statistics, as things. Services
are not objects. Services are more like verbs, than nouns. Nouns are things.
So yes, your assertion that "You and your 'services' are 'things'" is
"inappropriately flat" is correct. Your prose does have the quality of
flatlines emanating from a morgue. When you can sling metaphors like a grill
cook slings hash, then perhaps your prose could be regarded as appropoetic.
In-Appropoetic
-
Type: discussion
Comments
On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Wally Keeler wrote:
> Joseph Franklyn McElroy is a human being. Human beings are not 'things' to
> other human beings, with the exclusion of socio/psychopaths: eg. Stalin,
> Hitler, et al who regarded human beings as statistics, as things.
You are a moron: thing doesn't imply objectivication or statistics.
Avoid projecting wishful knee-jerk onto my words. Joseph mCeLroy
is in fact a_ thing, and that does not imply statistics or
objectification. As for your comment about 'Stalin* and 'Hitler*–
neither of whom you understand at all–that's fraudulent shit also.
Human beings as 'dolls' or 'things' or 'puppets'–have been present
in ALL cultures across the globe–outside of any political agendas:
native american kachinas, japanese dolls, russian dolls, chinese
figurines, italian marionettes–as well as in all major exo and
esoteric philosophies and religions–as well as in contemporary art
(Hans Bellmer cf.)
You're just all too willing to jump with your righteous ignorant
crucifiction gun, aren't ya?
Idiot. Rest of stupid commentaries snipped.
Write back when you have something non-childish-reactionary to say.
And one more thing Wally–you're a thing too. A mechanical doll.
And you will remain so until you grow up–if that's possible for you.
I love how Canadians pose as more 'sophisticated' than Americans, btw–
while suffering from all the myopic idiocies of white middle class
ignorant twits.
No wait–tell us about your pathological understanding of Hitler & Stalin.
Nevermind that you're simply repeating crap beaten into your head in
school.
—– Original Message —–
From: "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" <[email protected]>
To: "Wally Keeler" <[email protected]>
Cc: "Joseph Franklyn McElroy Cor[porat]e [Per]form[ance] Art[ist]"
<[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 4:34 PM
Subject: Re: In-Appropoetic
> On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Wally Keeler wrote:
>
> > Joseph Franklyn McElroy is a human being. Human beings are not 'things'
to
> > other human beings, with the exclusion of socio/psychopaths: eg. Stalin,
> > Hitler, et al who regarded human beings as statistics, as things.
>
>
> You are a moron: thing doesn't imply objectivication or statistics.
> Avoid projecting wishful knee-jerk onto my words. Joseph mCeLroy
> is in fact a_ thing, and that does not imply statistics or
> objectification. As for your comment about 'Stalin* and 'Hitler*–
> neither of whom you understand at all–that's fraudulent shit also.
>
> Human beings as 'dolls' or 'things' or 'puppets'–have been present
> in ALL cultures across the globe–outside of any political agendas:
> native american kachinas, japanese dolls, russian dolls, chinese
> figurines, italian marionettes–as well as in all major exo and
> esoteric philosophies and religions–as well as in contemporary art
> (Hans Bellmer cf.)
>
> You're just all too willing to jump with your righteous ignorant
> crucifiction gun, aren't ya?
>
> Idiot. Rest of stupid commentaries snipped.
>
> Write back when you have something non-childish-reactionary to say.
>
>