collaboration...where, what and who?

I've been writing and researching what it net.collaboration means, the
problematics of this and trying to devise strategies to perhaps re-
present the cyber-kitchen project. In doing this I've noticed that rhizome
(and my other usual trusted sources of text and information) are very
happy to talk about artists on the net 'in collaboration' but not what
being 'in collaboration IS. ..

(some questions - not necessarily what I think)

What does being 'in collaboration' on the net mean?

When there is talk of a group of collaborating artists does this often
really mean that they are just exhibiting together under the same
theme? (or when is a collaboration not a collaboration)

When net artists collaborate how closely do the artists influence each
other, side by side (you do the text, i'll do the music) or in each others
pockets (file sharing, working into each others artworks etc)?

Is collaboration at it's base level simply a way of getting people to do
the work you can't? If so, is there anything wrong with that?

Who and where is the 'good practice' of net.collaboration?

Wondered if anyone had any thoughts or links to texts about this….

cheers,
jess. o
/^ rssgallery.com
][

Comments

, joseph mcelroy

Collaboration is tricky, especially for creative people. The project is very
rare that can be successful with multiple focii…thus one focus is required
for most projects and this is where the problems start - who's gaze is going to
be followed. The other artist's have to willingly submit their creative
talents and energies to creating someone elses vision. A good lead will of
course try to broaden and encorporate as much of the other people's vision as
is possible - to give everybody the good feeling of having contributed more
than labor.



Joseph Franklyn McElroy
Cor[porat]e [Per]form[ance] Art[ist]

, clement Thomas

Jess Loseby a *crit :

> I've been writing and researching what it net.collaboration means, the
> problematics of this and trying to devise strategies to perhaps re-
> present the cyber-kitchen project. In doing this I've noticed that rhizome
> (and my other usual trusted sources of text and information) are very
> happy to talk about artists on the net 'in collaboration' but not what
> being 'in collaboration IS. ..
>
> (some questions - not necessarily what I think)
>
> What does being 'in collaboration' on the net mean?

- playing ping pong but both players on the same side of the table.
http://pavu.com/2000

more knowledge to be provided on request

wishing you the best always,

the pavu.com team
http://pavu.com
-/ the next route plining ! /-

, Wally Keeler

A wonderful exception to that general rule is the creative collaboration of
GENERAL IDEA:

http://www.erin.utoronto.ca/services/gallery/biography.htm


—– Original Message —–
From: "Joseph Franklyn McElroy Cor[porat]e [Per]form[ance] Art[ist]"
<[email protected]>
> Collaboration is tricky, especially for creative people. The project is
very
> rare that can be successful with multiple focii…thus one focus is
required
> for most projects and this is where the problems start - who's gaze is
going to
> be followed. The other artist's have to willingly submit their creative
> talents and energies to creating someone elses vision. A good lead will
of
> course try to broaden and encorporate as much of the other people's vision
as
> is possible - to give everybody the good feeling of having contributed
more
> than labor.
> –
> Joseph Franklyn McElroy
> Cor[porat]e [Per]form[ance] Art[ist]T
>
> Quoting Jess Loseby <[email protected]>:
> > I've been writing and researching what it net.collaboration means, the
> > problematics of this and trying to devise strategies to perhaps re-
> > present the cyber-kitchen project. In doing this I've noticed that
rhizome
> > (and my other usual trusted sources of text and information) are very
> > happy to talk about artists on the net 'in collaboration' but not what
> > being 'in collaboration IS. ..
> >
> > (some questions - not necessarily what I think)
> >
> > What does being 'in collaboration' on the net mean?
> >
> > When there is talk of a group of collaborating artists does this often
> > really mean that they are just exhibiting together under the same
> > theme? (or when is a collaboration not a collaboration)
> >
> > When net artists collaborate how closely do the artists influence each
> > other, side by side (you do the text, i'll do the music) or in each
others
> > pockets (file sharing, working into each others artworks etc)?
> >
> > Is collaboration at it's base level simply a way of getting people to do
> > the work you can't? If so, is there anything wrong with that?
> >
> > Who and where is the 'good practice' of net.collaboration?
> >
> > Wondered if anyone had any thoughts or links to texts about this….
> >
> > cheers,
> > jess. o
> > /^ rssgallery.com

, Jess Loseby

cheers for this joseph, good thoughts….
jess.
>
> Collaboration is tricky, especially for creative people. The project is very
> rare that can be successful with multiple focii…thus one focus is required
> o
/^ rssgallery.com
][

, joseph mcelroy

Careful, you might turn my head.
Joseph

Quoting Jess Loseby <[email protected]>:

> cheers for this joseph, good thoughts….
> jess.
> >
> > Collaboration is tricky, especially for creative people. The project is
> very
> > rare that can be successful with multiple focii…thus one focus is
> required
> > o
> /^ rssgallery.com
> ][