Sloth for Death: google "logos mind genius"

On Sat, 7 Sep 2002, Max Herman wrote:

> Death: I think your thinking on things is quite divergent from Genius 2000.
> However, instead of taking on the matter directly, you are playing
> Baker-roshi. You are a LIAR!!!!!!!!!!!

Sorry, but no.

> I consider you a hack until further notice.

I'm sorry Max. Do you think this idiotic behavior is a form of 'art'?

> I think you are jealous and are projecting your own fathomless
> incapacity to achieve onto me.

You have no capacityto 'achieve' Max.

> Now I shall pursue a weakening of your unacceptable assertions. Aren't you scared?

My assertions are not unacceptable. No, I'm not scared.
You're digging your own grave–and not in that good way either.


> I am going to begin to neutralize you starting now.
>
> You are redundant and obnoxious.

Speaking of yourself Max.

> Your detachment is solipsism.

No, it isn't. My detachment is exactly and precisely detachment.

> I will consider any attempt on your part to help as an affront and will nullify as
> needed.

You break my heart.

> If in fact you are the greater master I will fail.

Masters are not 'geatest'.

> If you are the weaker you shall be forced aside into outer darkness.

No baby. You're an idiot. And this is precisely what my problem with you
is: you're a bully.

> I am generating curatives for your brand of disciplinary interference.

I'm sure you are.

> For starters, you are not very literate at all.

Boo-hoo. Cry me a river. Actually, unlike you, I am literate.
You don't even know what literacy is, aside from whatever crap
has been stuck in your head from some mediocre school, and which
subsequently affects all your 'reading'.


> Your reference to Middlemarch is yes a mediocre reading,

No, it isn't. Go ahead. Froth at the mouth.

> and I will bust you on it if you care to pursue.

No you won't. But I'm sure you'll spew garbage.

> Otherwise let it be known you overrate yourself with your talk
> of Eliot.

No, I don't. Besides I wasn't talking about Eliot,
but about your reading of it. You're not capable of talking
about Eliot.

> I can prove it quite well.

No, you can't. Reality is not subject to proof, monkey-brain.

> You are more the reducer (non-rocket)

I am not a reducer. Your projections are infantile.
Again–you don't perceive, but seek for labels from your inventory.

> Your reading of it is adolescent and obsequious.

That would be YOUR reading, dear.

> You are a coward.

Hardly. You're speaking of yourself only, baby.

> You have a narrow mind

No, I don't. And unlike you, I have a mind–you only have a brain.

> and are jealous that you didn't do G2K yourself,

Right. What are you talking abouta gain?

> because it confirms your hyperanalytical stagnant house of
> cards

There is nothing 'analytical' about my behavior.
You're blind as a bat.

> as the illusion of control

No, sorry. You are the one attempting to use control, Max.
You confuse self-responsibility, and self-discipline with 'control
illusion' and you try to peddle that the former are problematic.
You advocate that people relinquish the former two.
This is attempting control.


> that feeds your monstrously impoverished psyche.

The one with the monstrously impoverished psyche is you.

Ta.

`, . ` `k a r e i' ? ' D42

> > that feeds your monstrously impoverished psyche.
>
> The one with the monstrously impoverished psyche is you.

No it's you chump. But yeah keep ragging me if you think it will help the
world. I guess that's where it's at.

Best of luck with your other pupils! For my part, I think you are an
ass-ramming uncle-fucker. However you are in abundant company in saying
that Max Herman is not an artist of value, which is what I mean by
redundant.

Also, if you have the guts, send someone you know and respect to
genius2000.net and see if they hate it too.

I also like how you said your dad and granpa were rich because they had
spiritual fortitude. What's your Mom like? Do you work in Russian VR
research labs and all? Do you have any siblings? Do they hate your guts?
Also, how old are you? I'm 33.

Don't forget to shove a bunch of pierogies up your uncle's ass too while
you're at it. He deserves the best.

I deeply admire all that you have already and will surely in the future
accomplish. Do you like Nadine Gordimer or William Safire?



>
>Ta.
>
>`, . ` `k a r e i' ? ' D42
>
>+ If the reader will keep me company I shall be glad.
>-> post: [email protected]
>-> questions: [email protected]
>-> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
>-> give: http://rhizome.org/support
>+
>Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
>Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.php




_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com

On Sat, 7 Sep 2002, Max Herman wrote:

> No it's you chump.

The only chmp with impoverished psyche here, is you.

> But yeah keep ragging me if you think it will help the
> world. I guess that's where it's at.

Nobody is ragging you.

> Best of luck with your other pupils!

I've never offered you to be my pupil. Don't flatter yourself.
I was interested in your ability to maintain mental balance.
You lack it.

> For my part, I think you are an ass-ramming uncle-fucker.

You can't think.

> However you are in abundant company in saying
> that Max Herman is not an artist of value, which is what I mean by
> redundant.

Sweetheart, YOU_ are redundant.

> Also, if you have the guts, send someone you know and respect to
> genius2000.net and see if they hate it too.

No. And your pathetic knee-jerk bullying is ridiculous.

> I also like how you said your dad and granpa were rich because they had
> spiritual fortitude.

Yep.

> What's your Mom like?

She's French and spoiled.

> Do you work in Russian VR research labs and all?

No, but I've worked in labs that I cannot tell you about.
Russian, French, Chinese, Mexican, Turkish, American.

> Do you have any siblings?

Yep.

> Do they hate your guts?

No. I haven't spoken to them in 25 years though.
Nor do I plan to, ever.

> Also, how old are you?

47.

> Don't forget to shove a bunch of pierogies up your uncle's ass too while
> you're at it. He deserves the best.

I'll keave that to you and your uncle.

> I deeply admire all that you have already and will surely in the future
> accomplish.

Hardly.

> Do you like Nadine Gordimer or William Safire?

Ne.

`, . ` `k a r e i' ? ' D42

Sophist.Poor litle person without proud.
—– Original Message —–
From: "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" <[email protected]>
To: "Max Herman" <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, September 07, 2002 1:03 PM
Subject: Re: RHIZOME_RAW: Sloth for Death: google "logos mind genius"


> On Sat, 7 Sep 2002, Max Herman wrote:
>
> > No it's you chump.
>
> The only chmp with impoverished psyche here, is you.
>
> > But yeah keep ragging me if you think it will help the
> > world. I guess that's where it's at.
>
> Nobody is ragging you.
>
> > Best of luck with your other pupils!
>
> I've never offered you to be my pupil. Don't flatter yourself.
> I was interested in your ability to maintain mental balance.
> You lack it.
>
> > For my part, I think you are an ass-ramming uncle-fucker.
>
> You can't think.
>
> > However you are in abundant company in saying
> > that Max Herman is not an artist of value, which is what I mean by
> > redundant.
>
> Sweetheart, YOU_ are redundant.
>
> > Also, if you have the guts, send someone you know and respect to
> > genius2000.net and see if they hate it too.
>
> No. And your pathetic knee-jerk bullying is ridiculous.
>
> > I also like how you said your dad and granpa were rich because they had
> > spiritual fortitude.
>
> Yep.
>
> > What's your Mom like?
>
> She's French and spoiled.
>
> > Do you work in Russian VR research labs and all?
>
> No, but I've worked in labs that I cannot tell you about.
> Russian, French, Chinese, Mexican, Turkish, American.
>
> > Do you have any siblings?
>
> Yep.
>
> > Do they hate your guts?
>
> No. I haven't spoken to them in 25 years though.
> Nor do I plan to, ever.
>
> > Also, how old are you?
>
> 47.
>
> > Don't forget to shove a bunch of pierogies up your uncle's ass too while
> > you're at it. He deserves the best.
>
> I'll keave that to you and your uncle.
>
> > I deeply admire all that you have already and will surely in the future
> > accomplish.
>
> Hardly.
>
> > Do you like Nadine Gordimer or William Safire?
>
> Ne.
>
> `, . ` `k a r e i' ? ' D42
>
> + If the reader will keep me company I shall be glad.
> -> post: [email protected]
> -> questions: [email protected]
> -> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
> -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
> +
> Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
> Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.php
>
>

On Sat, 7 Sep 2002, manik wrote:

> Sophist.

Sorry baby. Not an ounce of sophism.
Can't react outside of labels? I'm not the cardboard cutouts in your
head.

> Poor litle person without proud.

Hardly poor. hardly little. Without pride, I assume?
Certainly. Pride is a poor substitute for awareness and dignity.

But then again, kitsch is de rigeur.


`, . ` `k a r e i' ? ' D42

Sophist?No,Bamby,it's not a sophist,it's a flower.
—– Original Message —–
From: "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" <[email protected]>
To: "manik" <[email protected]>
Cc: "Max Herman" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 2:16 AM
Subject: Re: RHIZOME_RAW: Sloth for Death: google "logos mind genius"


> On Sat, 7 Sep 2002, manik wrote:
>
> > Sophist.
>
> Sorry baby. Not an ounce of sophism.
> Can't react outside of labels? I'm not the cardboard cutouts in your
> head.
>
> > Poor litle person without proud.
>
> Hardly poor. hardly little. Without pride, I assume?
> Certainly. Pride is a poor substitute for awareness and dignity.
>
> But then again, kitsch is de rigeur.
>
>
> `, . ` `k a r e i' ? ' D42
>
>
>

On Sun, 8 Sep 2002, manik wrote:

> Sophist?No,Bamby,it's not a sophist,it's a flower.

I almost feel insulted. Try harder.


`, . ` `k a r e i' ? ' D42