Re: Sv: Re: Aw: [7-11] Re: [etc.

On Sun, 18 Aug 2002, + lo_y + wrote:

> ( "don't tell me what the purpose of my words should be" )

I am not telling you what the purpose of words SHOULD be.
I have some actual_ knowledge on the functionality of words.
Reality is not a matter of 'opinion', and neither is the function
of 'words'–limited as it may be.

> i invite people to make whatever they want of wat i do

as long as they dump energy in your ego's direktion

> ( but i'm sure you can tell them exactly how they should read )

I am not *telling* anybody what they should read:
the fact that you dislike what I have to say
+ it is contradiktory to your idea that opinions are of 'worth'
it does not indikate that I am 'telling' anybody what to read.

Am more than aware than one cannot force another being
to do anything + would not even dream of doing so.

That doesn't change the fact that you're incapable of language use
+ the purpose of your exercise is to sap energy
+ you're cheap + easy in your continuous 'degrading' attempts.

Objective + poetik truth does exhist.
To those who can listn.






>
> _______________________________________
>
> __ - - lo_y - - __ _
> _______________________________________
>
> PTRz:
> http://trace.ntu.ac.uk/incubation/gallery.cfm
> http://www.muse-apprentice-guild.com
> http://www.krikri.be/poeuk.html
> http://www.google.com/search?q=lo_y
> http://lo-y.diaryland.com/
> ________________________________________
> + full uv s0und n fury s1gnifying > /dev/null
> -> post: [email protected]
> -> questions: [email protected]
> -> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
> -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
> +
> Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
> Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.php
>

o
[ + ]

+ + +


| '|' |
_________________________________________
`, . ` `k a r e i' ? ' D42