image-blog

who's visual?

a while ago, marc garret and i tried having a conversation in
drawings. but the technical part got in the way. but recently
spurred on by the show of urgency at rhizome to get manik's images in
on the discussion, i came up with this…

to make it all easier, added an image-blog to the plasma site (URL in
the sig below). the idea is like a conversation, rather than a bunch
of monologues. you just respond with another language, visual
instead of words. the images can be swiped or scanned or whatever.
can we reply in the language of images, or just display them?

unlike the artist from columbia who wanted to know about copyright
laws, i am only living near columbia university. a comparatively
cushy american city where we are required by law to do something
mildly disreputable at least once a week.


this isn't about probing or testing or questioning the laws, it's
just a conversation. it ain't about propriety. it's about your
responses, and i just don't care where they derive from or how you
arrive at them.

so give it a shot.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

PLASMA STUDII
art non-profit
stages * galleries * the web
New York, USA

(on-line press kit)
http://plasmastudii.org

Comments

, marc garrett

Yes, I remember this - it was quite a while ago in fact. About 4 years
ago probably…

Setting up a forum restricted to images alone is worth trying out,
furtherfield actually did manage create such a format and it was the
'Visitorstudio', remember the dissention convention project? it was perl
scripted and you could have swf, jpg and mp3 files, all mixed live
together (currently being rebuilt).

Will have allok at this and play:-)

marc


> who's visual?
>
> a while ago, marc garret and i tried having a conversation in
> drawings. but the technical part got in the way. but recently
> spurred on by the show of urgency at rhizome to get manik's images in
> on the discussion, i came up with this…
>
> to make it all easier, added an image-blog to the plasma site (URL in
> the sig below). the idea is like a conversation, rather than a bunch
> of monologues. you just respond with another language, visual instead
> of words. the images can be swiped or scanned or whatever. can we
> reply in the language of images, or just display them?
>
> unlike the artist from columbia who wanted to know about copyright
> laws, i am only living near columbia university. a comparatively
> cushy american city where we are required by law to do something
> mildly disreputable at least once a week.
>
>
> this isn't about probing or testing or questioning the laws, it's just
> a conversation. it ain't about propriety. it's about your responses,
> and i just don't care where they derive from or how you arrive at them.
>
> so give it a shot.