Re: service economy/art

On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, ryan griffis wrote:

> > comments pertinent for many discusssion occurring here (maybe), dated as they may be (yet not brought up very much.)
> courtesy andrea fraser
> http://adaweb.walkerart.org/~dn/a/enfra/afraser1.html
> http://www.macba.es/english/09/09_12.html
> http://www.journalofaestheticsandprotest.org/1/vegas/
> http://www.eipcp.net/diskurs/d07/text/fraser_en.html


You mean the slave-economy 'art performanz' where humanz
get used az energetic whorez to serve ______ agendaz. A
human cannot be not 'of service' when having found its own
intent, as the eminent Monsieur Tzara would say.

Or as lovely otherz would, kundalini haz a mind of itz own.

Those wishing that otherz 'believe' in their schlock when it'z
most evidently schlock, and especially when they try to dress it up
in big wordz or 'theoriez' which at bezt they don't understand
and at worzt are sub-mediocre meaningless verbal diarhhea.


`, . ` `k a r e i' ? ' D42