death- terminally boring & a racist to boot.

On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, Michael Szpakowski wrote:

> I blocked the deeply tedious death some way back.

The only deeply tedious occurrence here is you.
Your conceit + self-importance are blowing bigger
than a Chairman Mao Grand parade poster in a
warhol exhibit.

> Unfortunately however I still occasionally have to
> read his drivel

Sorry. No drivel. Keep your idiotic derogatory
ignorant projectorial self-hatred to yourself.

> In general I'm in favour of free speech and would
> still be unhappy for this list to be moderated.
> I do wonder if there isn't a case however for the
> collective blocking of the perpetrator of this sort of
> racist shit.

> <And in general, you're more
> asleep than a bunch of
> illiterate mexicans.>

This is RACIST? I'm afraid you must have some deep internal problems
and I'd very much areciate it if you AVOID projecting your own
racist problems on my words and attempting to have me lynched for it.

This is slanderous libel, and little more.

`, . ` `k a r e i' ? ' D42

Quoting Michael Szpakowski <[email protected]>:

> I blocked the deeply tedious death some way back.
> Unfortunately however I still occasionally have to
> read his drivel second hand as I try to keep up with
> with the many posts that are worth reading.
> In general I'm in favour of free speech and would
> still be unhappy for this list to be moderated.
> I do wonder if there isn't a case however for the
> collective blocking of the perpetrator of this sort of
> racist shit.
>
> <And in general, you're more
> asleep than a bunch of
> illiterate mexicans.>
>

It is difficult to figure out where to draw the line and who decides.

Joseph

> > <And in general, you're more
> > asleep than a bunch of
> > illiterate mexicans.>
>
> This is RACIST? I'm afraid you must have some deep internal problems
> and I'd very much areciate it if you AVOID projecting your own
> racist problems on my words and attempting to have me lynched for it.

Karei, you can't say that kind of shit. Not even. They'll kick your ass
right off in a hot minute. Unless that's what you want.

It was obvious to me that Karei was alluding to the cozy racism that seethes
under the pious PC postures, but still man you got only yourself to blame if
you keep that shrillness.

There will always be a space in my inbox if you need a little coke and
sympathy however. I'm just the grandest no?



>
> This is slanderous libel, and little more.
>
>`, . ` `k a r e i' ? ' D42
>
>+ tripe

.^``
X333CV/^
>-> post: [email protected]
>-> questions: [email protected]
>-> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
>-> give: http://rhizome.org/support
>+
>Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
>Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.php




_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com

On Sun, 13 Oct 2002 [email protected] wrote:

> No, many populations would take illiteracy as an insult.

Incorrect. Non-white 'populations' do not care about your white-middle
class literacy one bit. Not one.

> Yes - I am sure you "like" illiterate Mexicans.

No dearest. I LIKE them.

> And now you are playing "mindfuck" word games,

No dearest, I am not. You're projecting.
Idiotic brute ape.

> for we all "know" that Mexicans is a racial term

No dearest. WE don't. Don't attempt to dictate to ALL what to think
baby.

> and not a nationalist term in the
> context that you used it. Wiggle.

No dearest. I used it as a nationality indicating term.
That's EXACTLy how I used it.
NationalIST? Idiot.

`, . ` `k a r e i' ? ' D42

On Fri, 11 Oct 2002, Max Herman wrote:

> > This is RACIST? I'm afraid you must have some deep internal problems
> > and I'd very much areciate it if you AVOID projecting your own
> > racist problems on my words and attempting to have me lynched for it.
>
> Karei, you can't say that kind of shit. Not even. They'll kick your ass
> right off in a hot minute. Unless that's what you want.

Sorry: neither you nor anyone else is an authority on what I can or
cannot say.

> It was obvious to me that Karei was alluding to the cozy racism that seethes
> under the pious PC postures,

That wasn't what I was referring to. I like illiterate Mexicans.
My statement was extremely straightforward with no subtle agendas.
Mexicans is not a racial term no more than Americans, or French
or Chinese. Second, only white-middle class populations see
illiteracy as an insult. Mexicans don't necessarily.

> but still man you got only yourself to blame

I ain't a dog, idiot. There is no BLAME involved, nor am I about
to kick myself because some morons are illiterate twits.

> if you keep that shrillness.

There is no 'shrillness'. You're projecting.

> There will always be a space in my inbox if you need a little coke and
> sympathy however. I'm just the grandest no?

Smirk. Save your sympathy–and you mean PITY for yourself.
`, . ` `k a r e i' ? ' D42

Quoting "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" <[email protected]>:

>
> That wasn't what I was referring to. I like illiterate Mexicans.
> My statement was extremely straightforward with no subtle agendas.
> Mexicans is not a racial term no more than Americans, or French
> or Chinese. Second, only white-middle class populations see
> illiteracy as an insult. Mexicans don't necessarily.

No, many populations would take illiteracy as an insult. Yes - I am sure you
"like" illiterate Mexicans. And now you are playing "mindfuck" word games, for
we all "know" that Mexicans is a racial term and not a nationalist term in the
context that you used it. Wiggle.

joseph