As a quick example of change (was 'Community')

nice


On 10/9/06 11:52 AM, "richard willis" <[email protected]>
wrote:

> As a quick example of change,
> it’s turning into an anniversary festival,
> moving through the system,
> RAW should be My complaints, then,
> why couldn't Rhizome adopt a First,
> of course, As a suggestion,
> Many of us seem to believe
> And that's just hysterical the instant
> We are, all, unwilling to accept
> which is actually kind of cute,
> dass es immer problematischer wird,
> Leave RAW alone please.
> I liked it better
> with Super User supervision.
> It unfortunately has become
> fun. It’s totally net art.
> If I like it, I’m posting it
> Maybe I'm odd,
> Don't read everything, but
> somehow "crowd out" discussion.
> declare an interest here,
> I'm looking forward to seeing where this conversation goes,
> This is exciting to me,
> Patrick really used our massive server
> We actually have already begun
> And actually, we do have a box
> and have an interest in its evolution.
> I am reposting what I said,
> But seriousely,
> This isn't incendiary,
> it won't even be considered by the "staff".
> I can imagine a community box. I think
> it's to much at the bottom
> but it's worth a try.
> to delirium, to announcements, to
> "steal" links and content on the
> undestandable inertia
> It would bring the
> Slashdot approach to project development, where
> As a quick example of change, why couldn't Rhizome
>
>
>
> by Steven Read, Eric Dymond, Lee Wells, Annie Abrahams, Jason Van Anden,
> Lauren Cornell, alexis turner, MANIK, Pall Thayer, Rob Myers, T.Whid,
> beate zurwehme, M. River, Michael Szpakowski, Rob Myers & salvatore
> iaconesi
>
> +
> -> post: [email protected]
> -> questions: [email protected]
> -> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
> -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
> +
> Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
> Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.php
>
>