Call for Images: Everyday Information Architecture

One has troble understanding the "meaning" of collaborative projects
designed to serve a single individual's "aim". What's in your publication
for us?

Or has rhizome been reduced to a place to "fish" for "humans" as vehicles
for your desires?

On Mon, 5 Jun 2006, Benjamin Fischer wrote:

> Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 11:10:07 +0200
> From: Benjamin Fischer <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RHIZOME\_RAW: Call for Images: Everyday Information Architecture
>
> -
> CALL FOR IMAGES: EVERYDAY INFORMATION ARCHITECTURE
> Deadline: 2006-06-10
> -
>
> For a publication (part of my thesis in communication design) on how
> we find, collect, evaluate and share information I am searching for
> images of

Hi,
I am sorry if you feel like a human being fished for some individual
aims. As rhizome is a very vivid and heterogeneously community I
thought it might be interesting for others to contribute their work.
If the submissions are exciting then the final publication might also
be of interest and not only for me.
Thanks for your comment, best regards,

Benjamin

Am 06.06.2006 um 03:54 schrieb -IID42 Kandinskij @27+:

> One has troble understanding the "meaning" of collaborative projects
> designed to serve a single individual's "aim". What's in your
> publication
> for us?
>
> Or has rhizome been reduced to a place to "fish" for "humans" as
> vehicles
> for your desires?
>
> On Mon, 5 Jun 2006, Benjamin Fischer wrote:
>
>> Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 11:10:07 +0200
>> From: Benjamin Fischer <[email protected]>
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: RHIZOME\_RAW: Call for Images: Everyday Information
>> Architecture
>>
>> -
>> CALL FOR IMAGES: EVERYDAY INFORMATION ARCHITECTURE
>> Deadline: 2006-06-10
>> -
>>
>> For a publication (part of my thesis in communication design) on how
>> we find, collect, evaluate and share information I am searching for
>> images of

We don't feel and you are not sorry.


> I am sorry if you feel like a human being fished for some individual
> aims.

Nice we begin by dismissing all validity of what was written by
misrepresenting it as a "feeling," and trying to turn around the
responsibility of what *you* are doing onto "our feeling".

Sweetheart, we are not the peasants over there who are ruled by "feeling"
and what was written to you was not a "feeling kneejerk".

> As rhizome is a very vivid and heterogeneously community I
> thought it might be interesting for others to contribute their work.

Meaningless propagandist bullshit. "You" "thought" of ways to getting
others to do your work. We are so sorry about your "feeling"–while
etc.

Your mother may be a peasant whore who enjoys getting fucked in the ass,
but neither of us do.

> If the submissions are exciting

Exciting? Like a cattle prod?

> then the final publication might also be of interest and not only for me.

Yeah, was it good for me, and it was good for you.

> Thanks for your comment, best regards,

"Dismissive feign".

`, . ` `k a r e i' ? ' D42

Addendum: is this an art-world-mailing list or a cloaka where you get your
ass covered by "image" used as toilet paper?

Perhaps you claim to be an artist as well?

Would you like to "damage" our eyes?


o
[ + ]

+ + +


| '|' |
_________________________________________
`, . ` `k a r e i' ? ' D42