Re: [greatbiggroup] Re: 'THE POWER OF NIGHTMARES and POSITIVE PLANS TO COUNTERACT SUCH

Seeing as poorly as the Intelligence Agencies have been doing apoor job
in the past 10 or 15 years I have decided to start one of my own.
I am accepting resumes and funding in the form of well concealed
cash, gold coin (Saints are particualrly appreciated;) and papers
and a analyses of the domestic and international affairs and the like.
Please send these to: Steve Kudlak Esquire et factotum POBX 2005
Watsonville, CA 95077-2005. We'd like to open an office by Spring 2005.
N.B. I wish this did seem like just a silly joke, but the current
situatons is so bad there are days I/we could do a better job than
the officials who supposedly are doing this so well.


Have Fun,
Sends Steve

P.S. I consider myself a center-left independednt/
N.B. There are many positions opem, applicants should
be able demonstrate prima facie savior in 50 to 70% of
almost all situations they are apt to encounter and
have a good intuititve grasp of 90% all situations.
Ability to sit i Paficic Ocean at 37N 122W (approximately)
is admirable but not a job requirement/


>
> —– Original Message —–
> From: "John B"
> To:
> Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 11:54 AM
> Subject: [greatbiggroup] Re: "THE POWER OF NIGHTMARES
>
>
> > There *is* an independant senator, Jim Jeffords of Vermont, as well
> > as a few independant congresscritters. Admittedly, the last
> > independent president (well, not in the two parties in use today) was
> > at least in the 1800's.
>
> So independents are in a pretty deep minority.
>
> > 'Democrate'. Heh. *grin*
>
> Damn these sausage fingers!
>
> > Actually, I don't think I was clear enough. I don't think he'd work
> > well with the Bush team, as his goals and world view is so different.
> > I don't think he's a good enough politician to have dropped party
> > differences and just WORKED, following the President's guidance.
>
> Okay, I see. But in the end, I would bet that, had the cards fallen that
> way, a less qualified Republican would have been chosen over a more
> qualified Democrat.
>
> **chuckles** It's kind of odd to see me arguing like this, as much as my
> opinion of Dems has sunk over the past four years.
>
> > Curious - how do you know they didn't do research on the QT before
> > the announcement? I'll stipulate that that's probably not the way to
> > bet - but how do you KNOW?
>
> Well, we can never know. And yes, I'm probably second guessing the
> Administration. But, c'mon. If they're not going to say anything about
> the
> process, assuming that they *didn't* search before hand is just as valid
> as
> thinking that they might have done so. If they come out with some
> information stating that they had been looking for a long while, then
> that's
> all good.
>
> …John…
>
>
>
> —
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.784 / Virus Database: 530 - Release Date: 10/27/2004
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ADVERTISEMENT
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/greatbiggroup/
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> [email protected]
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.