Re: ScanMail Message: To Sender, sensitive content found and action taken.

I advocate the creation of a Network Solutions-like company, a
quasi-official body that will sell guaranteed access to email
addresses. That third-party solution would possess a master list
and database, along with a controlled blacklist. It would audit
and regulate commercial email, allowing us to bribe our way
through corporate firewalls. Alternately, we could all use the
free software (which works) to filter free mail (which works.)

On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, furtherfield wrote:

> This is the type of backward nonsense I am referring to. If the word crappy
> is seen as offensive sensitive then The American government is imposing
> limits that are beyond reason. Who has had the same problems - or am I being
> picked on by some 'cyber bimbo'.
>
> marc
>
>
> —– Original Message —–
> From: "System Attendant" <[email protected]>
> To: "'furtherfield'" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 12:58 PM
> Subject: ScanMail Message: To Sender, sensitive content found and action
> taken.
>
>
> > Trend SMEX Content Filter has detected sensitive content.
> >
> > Place = [email protected]; ; ; furtherfield
> > Sender = furtherfield
> > Subject = RHIZOME_RAW: crappy!
> > Delivery Time = June 20, 2002 (Thursday) 07:58:49
> > Policy = Anti-Spam
> > Action on this mail = Delete message
> >
> > Warning message from administrator:
> > Content filter has detected a sensitive e-mail.
> >
>
>
>
>
>

but … isn't what network solutions does anyway? for the right
price, of course …


>I advocate the creation of a Network Solutions-like company, a
>quasi-official body that will sell guaranteed access to email
>addresses. That third-party solution would possess a master list
>and database, along with a controlled blacklist. It would audit
>and regulate commercial email, allowing us to bribe our way
>through corporate firewalls. Alternately, we could all use the
>free software (which works) to filter free mail (which works.)
>
>On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, furtherfield wrote:
>
>> This is the type of backward nonsense I am referring to. If the word crappy
>> is seen as offensive sensitive then The American government is imposing
>> limits that are beyond reason. Who has had the same problems - or am I being
>> picked on by some 'cyber bimbo'.
>>
>> marc
>>
>>
>> —– Original Message —–
>> From: "System Attendant" <[email protected]>
>> To: "'furtherfield'" <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 12:58 PM
>> Subject: ScanMail Message: To Sender, sensitive content found and action
>> taken.
>>
>>
>> > Trend SMEX Content Filter has detected sensitive content.
>> >
>> > Place = [email protected]; ; ; furtherfield
>> > Sender = furtherfield
>> > Subject = RHIZOME_RAW: crappy!
>> > Delivery Time = June 20, 2002 (Thursday) 07:58:49
>> > Policy = Anti-Spam
>> > Action on this mail = Delete message
>> >
>> > Warning message from administrator:
>> > Content filter has detected a sensitive e-mail.
>> >
>>
>>
>>
> >
>>