Re: Re: thecry.org

Chris Krajewski wrote:

> Indira Montoya wrote:
>
> > Thecry.org was a mental escape from the social and political crisis
> my
> > country went trough in 2001 and 2002.
> > My friends had left for europe, Buenos Aires was the capital of
> chaos,
> > and I saw my life and projects run down the drain in a few days.
> Love,
> > hatred, illusions, all could be resumed in a word: failure.
> > thecry.org is about visual consequences; the only consequences one
> > could empatically assume in the middle of doubts. For the first time
> > in years, my country, magically, assume it was a part of Latin
> > America, and rejectantly revealed its most intimate, loneliest
> > inhabitants to the eyes of the casual viewer


: Dear Indira,
On behalf of Eldras the problem of the Creation attitude on the computer is the LACK of distinction between the meaningfully reasoned experiential (ART if you must empahtically define that through your personal creative to the UNCREATED object here and now); and the unmeaninged intended patch work of commerce seduction of a sense-datum determination (SCIENCE if you define it as proving that THEY or some individual including ME (ya, SURE) was GOOD). There should be distinction in this form of duality in the lesson, the wealth, or the school of aesthetics. This way there exists no recourse to reconciliation of hermeneutical means for communication and the shear empty passing and abiding of Time, the universal measurement and the sensation of impossible freedom.

For all the ART at SCIENCE they can perform, the SCIENCE cannot derive the existence of freedom for the ART the new aesthetics purports.

Yours sincerely,

Chris Krajewski
(still expecting the irradecent BABY from the port hole)