ET(HI)C

James Morgan <[email protected]>wrote:
I realize time is short, but did you ever receive a reply to this?

james

On Jan 12, 2007, at 1:47 AM, manik wrote:

>
> What was your standard in selecting those countries?Why this
> particulary
> area?Is there something different in political life than in your
> country?Which methodology you use to mark those teritories for your
> hunting
> area?
> What was your leading argumentation when you decided to take 'mision
> imposible' to transplate "ethic"on this particular places on the
> world?…Et(hi)c?…Et(i)c?…Etc?
> So far responsibility for trouble in the world lie on biger's and
> stronger's side.Why don't you try to re-examine term democracy in
> West,especially in"Main Subject"(Habermas)U.S.A?
> We find your believe in Wikileaks goes from same source as official
> 'west
> civilization' believe in "democracy".Efects are disastrous.
> MANIK
>
> "mez breeze" <[email protected]>wrote:
>
> "Wikileaks <http://www.wikileaks.org/index.html> is developing an
> uncensorable Wikipedia for untraceable mass document leaking and
> analysis.
> Our primary interests are oppressive regimes in Asia, the former
> Soviet
> bloc, Sub-Saharan Africa and the Middle East, but we also expect to
> be of
> assistance to those in the west who wish to reveal unethical
> behavior in
> their own governments and corporations. We aim for maximum
> political impact;
> this means our interface is identical to Wikipedia and usable by
> non-technical people. We have received over 1.1 million documents
> so far
> from dissident communities and anonymous sources.
>
> We believe that transparency in government activities leads to reduced
> corruption, better government and stronger democracies. Many
> governments
> would benefit from increased scrutiny by the world community, as
> well as
> their own people. We believe this scrutiny requires information.
> Historically that information has been costly - in terms of human
> life and
> human rights. Wikileaks will facilitate safety in the ethical leaking
> movement."
>
> –
> –LFG Curiosity, Play, or Xperimention PST–
> ———http://netwurker.livejournal.com/ ——
> ————sharding.ur.reality.purples——–
>
> +
> -> post: [email protected]
> -> questions: [email protected]
> -> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/
> subscribe.rhiz
> -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
> +
> Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
> Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/
> 29.php
>

Anything that can be made, can be made black.
Hi manik vauda marija,

Your Rhizome.org Membership has just expired. :-(

Do not despair – you can still browse our archives from the last year, and
your subscriptions to Rhizome email lists will still work. However, you will
no longer have access to the full breadth of what Rhizome has to offer:
access to all ten years of our archives, and the ability to use special
features. Unless, of course, you renew!

Your ongoing support is incredibly important to us. As a small, non-profit
organization, Rhizome relies on contributions from its Members to strengthen
its programs and to seed new initiatives.

We sincerely hope you will consider renewing by making a contribution of $25
today. We accept contributions online via secure credit card transaction or
PayPal; we also accept checks and money orders. To make a payment, please go
to:

http://rhizome.org/renew/?aTHact


Yours,

Rhizome.org



P.S. If you have made a donation within the past year, you are probably
receiving this email because you have multiple records in our database. If
this is the case then no further action needs to be taken. Please contact
[email protected] if you believe that there has been an error that
should be resolved or needs to be investigated.

+ + +

Rhizome.org is a not-for-profit 501©(3) organization and an affiliate of
the New Museum of Contemporary Art. For U.S. taxpayers, contributions to
Rhizome are tax-deductible, minus the value of any goods or services
received, to the extent allowed by law.

This really helps, thanks.

j

On Jan 16, 2007, at 12:47 PM, manik wrote:

> James wrote:
> I realize time is short, but did you ever receive a reply to this?
>
> james
>
> On Jan 12, 2007, at 1:47 AM, manik wrote:
>
>>
>> What was your standard in selecting those countries?Why this
>> particulary
>> area?Is there something different in political life than in your
>> country?Which methodology you use to mark those teritories for your
>> hunting
>> area?
>> What was your leading argumentation when you decided to take 'mision
>> imposible' to transplate "ethic"on this particular places on the
>> world?…Et(hi)c?…Et(i)c?…Etc?
>> So far responsibility for trouble in the world lie on biger's and
>> stronger's side.Why don't you try to re-examine term democracy in
>> West,especially in"Main Subject"(Habermas)U.S.A?
>> We find your believe in Wikileaks goes from same source as official
>> 'west
>> civilization' believe in "democracy".Efects are disastrous.
>> MANIK
>>
>> "mez breeze" <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>> "Wikileaks <http://www.wikileaks.org/index.html> is developing an
>> uncensorable Wikipedia for untraceable mass document leaking and
>> analysis.
>> Our primary interests are oppressive regimes in Asia, the former
>> Soviet
>> bloc, Sub-Saharan Africa and the Middle East, but we also expect to
>> be of
>> assistance to those in the west who wish to reveal unethical
>> behavior in
>> their own governments and corporations. We aim for maximum
>> political impact;
>> this means our interface is identical to Wikipedia and usable by
>> non-technical people. We have received over 1.1 million documents
>> so far
>> from dissident communities and anonymous sources.
>>
>> We believe that transparency in government activities leads to
>> reduced
>> corruption, better government and stronger democracies. Many
>> governments
>> would benefit from increased scrutiny by the world community, as
>> well as
>> their own people. We believe this scrutiny requires information.
>> Historically that information has been costly - in terms of human
>> life and
>> human rights. Wikileaks will facilitate safety in the ethical leaking
>> movement."
>>
>> –
>> –LFG Curiosity, Play, or Xperimention PST–
>> ———http://netwurker.livejournal.com/ ——
>> ————sharding.ur.reality.purples——–
>>
>> +
>> -> post: [email protected]
>> -> questions: [email protected]
>> -> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/
>> subscribe.rhiz
>> -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
>> +
>> Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
>> Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/
>> 29.php
>>
>
> Anything that can be made, can be made black.
> Hi manik vauda marija,
>
> Your Rhizome.org Membership has just expired. :-(
>
> Do not despair – you can still browse our archives from the last
> year, and
> your subscriptions to Rhizome email lists will still work. However,
> you will
> no longer have access to the full breadth of what Rhizome has to
> offer:
> access to all ten years of our archives, and the ability to use
> special
> features. Unless, of course, you renew!
>
> Your ongoing support is incredibly important to us. As a small,
> non-profit
> organization, Rhizome relies on contributions from its Members to
> strengthen
> its programs and to seed new initiatives.
>
> We sincerely hope you will consider renewing by making a
> contribution of $25
> today. We accept contributions online via secure credit card
> transaction or
> PayPal; we also accept checks and money orders. To make a payment,
> please go
> to:
>
> http://rhizome.org/renew/?aTHact
>
>
> Yours,
>
> Rhizome.org
>
>
>
> P.S. If you have made a donation within the past year, you are
> probably
> receiving this email because you have multiple records in our
> database. If
> this is the case then no further action needs to be taken. Please
> contact
> [email protected] if you believe that there has been an
> error that
> should be resolved or needs to be investigated.
>
> + + +
>
> Rhizome.org is a not-for-profit 501©(3) organization and an
> affiliate of
> the New Museum of Contemporary Art. For U.S. taxpayers,
> contributions to
> Rhizome are tax-deductible, minus the value of any goods or services
> received, to the extent allowed by law.
>
>
> +
> -> post: [email protected]
> -> questions: [email protected]
> -> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/
> subscribe.rhiz
> -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
> +
> Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
> Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/
> 29.php
>