>mez,
>
>For the record - I love your language.
>
cood.u.elaborate.as.2.y? [pls?]
>Clearly answering your question with a question is not going to be
>sufficient. Fortunately Ethan Ham and Eric Dymond took the night
>shift for this open sourced thread (albeit as re:re:re:s so I have
>reposted these below as part of this thread with my pseudo system of
>pseudo xml tags to indicate who said what). It's a relief, they are
>both better writers and we are on similar wave lengths. I was
>beginning to feel like a prude at Mardi Gras, with everyone
>pressuring me to show them my stuff.
>
again:: a [rose]build.on.a.build[rose].on.a.bu[dding.rose.gu]ild[ed]…….
this.graduation.of.[shared.talent.tree]experience+communication.thru.[inter.voiced{s}wo[llen(s)]ven.opinion.threads.is.a.far.more.delicious.calling.than.the."i.want""i.make""i.own".trajectory.
[my.stance.curls.around/thru.x[y].plaining.that.n.dividualised.ownership+the.cult.of.the._i_.is.e.ssen[ce]t.ially.retro[fitted].conservatism.made.static/sticky.with.agendas.far.reaching.+[deeply/m.bedded]faceted=mono.
in.my.frame [self]mono[thesism]_isn't.growth.
[we.break+shear.the.communal.in.order.2.economic[.rationalistic]ally.project]
[swirling.d(m)at(t)a.flow+revoking.the.ideologyof.self.thru.an.ownership.stamp]
.thank
[sitting + scrawling||
small.chalked.info.ramblings.on.2.lattice.fl[in]o[f]wer.grids+.typo.graphs]
_thick.memoir.cableing.nost[||neur]algia.bloody_
http://www.hotkey.net.au/~netwurker/
http://www.livejournal.com/users/netwurker/
.