nice 2 see Australian list culture also aligning itself 2wards censorship of
anything remotely anti-bush……fibreculture, at this stage, reminds me of
nettime at its worst!
*sigh*
—– Forwarded message from [email protected] —–
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 13:18:43 +1100
From: [email protected]
Reply-To: [email protected]
Subject: Request to mailing list Fibreculture rejected
To: [email protected]
Your request to the Fibreculture mailing list
Posting of your message titled "Fwd: NYTimes.com Article:
Atrocities in Plain Sight (fwd)"
has been rejected by the list moderator. The moderator gave the
following reason for rejecting your request:
" dear mez, i've rejected this post because it's not within the ::fc::
topic guidelines, which are here:
http://www.fibreculture.org/about.html if you've any questions about
how these are applied, don't hesitate to email me. thanks, dt (fc
facilitator) "
Any questions or comments should be directed to the list administrator
at:
[email protected]
—– End forwarded message —–
Fwd: Request to mailing list Fibreculture rejected
-
Type: discussion
Comments
Quoting myself:
> nice 2 see Australian list culture also aligning itself 2wards censorship of
>
> anything remotely anti-bush……fibreculture, at this stage, reminds me of
>
> nettime at its worst!
>
> *sigh*
>
>
i wanted to add here [pre_emptively, as i know fibreculturalists dwell here as
well] that i am currently m.mersed in constructing theory regarding concepts
of emotional intelligence + "trolling perceptions" of code/net.work[er] within
the australian new media mailing list(s)/ethos]. My primary [study] base is
the fibreculture network, so i'm not n.tirely unbiased here - ie tracing the
reactions that have been cycling/looping thru-out fc's m[f]ailing list shelf
life…
..i'm tempted to apologize 4 [wot some may term as a] new-jerk response 2
selective content masking via reactionary moderator behaviour, but sod that.
it's this type of covert regulated silence + [communicative] apathy that has
created a virtually unbreakable global-conservative acceptability network
gloss + that i find myself wading thru everyday via forums that previously
have m.braced [and dare i type it, celebrated] diversity + open[ly] x.pressive
tangents..
…it also allows for screened vilification of any voice striving to operate
outside strictures mandated via standardised polemic-inducing discourses [such
as is illustrated below, and wot i'm expecting 2 layer subsequent responses].
][mez][