old discu[rsive]ssion + portents of history

hi mez,

is this list para-art or art?
[same question, alternately posed:]
are our posts art.crit or poetry?

if both, but not concurrently in any single post,
then
to you they are mostly logic-bound
and
to them you are at best thrillingly diversive and at worse obtuse.

If both, and concurrently in a single post,
then
good luck, because
although
rhiz.raw may be a steely gulf stream amidst the bounding main of infinite network
still
we're bound to paddle it in our leaky word.canoes.

music/sound takes flight first,
then visuals and time-based motion,
then reactive/autogenerative code-driven behaviors/environments.

make raw a BBS and get francis to turn on html posting capabilities, and watch it fly:
cf: http://rhizome.org/object.rhiz?2261

until then, you are:
http://images.google.com/images?q=cigarette+boat
amidst:
http://images.google.com/images?q=tug+boat

vroom on u crazy diamond,
curt

_


mez breeze wrote:

>
> _"_
>
>
>
> is the threat of deracination that l[arge]ooming?
>
> i guess i somewot resign myself to the perpetual communication ethic
> that
> is displayed + ratified via email discussions like these, that tend 2
> have
> an almost n.built tendency to derail the potential for expanding [+
> hence
> end up stained with reductionististic overcasts] any presentation of
> genre_structures thru the need 2
> a) m.bed them in[2] a historical framework/grounding, no matter how
> loosely
> d.fined +
> b) draw threads 2wards analytical reasoning rather then n.courage
> communication methods||fractures that r utilised by the medium itself
> [echos of print-based culture, any1?;)]……..
>
> ie
> [d|n.duction via m.plied confliction/competition of sub(e)jective
> dia-as
> opposed 2 multi-logue connexion(s)]
> [m.ploy covertly_engineered friction minus the screech of
> troll-baiting +
> then mask the conflict rub as theorised learning curves]
> [non_spiral data adoption + edge 2wards genre-formulations thru the
> predicated rather than anomalous media x.tensions].
>
>
>
> _"_
>
> .©[lick].
> -
> -
>
> http://www.hotkey.net.au/~netwurker
> http://www.livejournal.com/users/netwurker/
>

At 02:45 PM 9/01/2004, you wrote:
>If both, and concurrently in a single post,


[ticking this boundaried box]

>then
>good luck, because
>although
>rhiz.raw may be a steely gulf stream amidst the bounding main of infinite
>network
>still
>we're bound to paddle it in our leaky word.canoes.

….+ how goes ur lea[ched]k.E absorption cradle?


>music/sound takes flight first,
>then visuals and time-based motion,
>then reactive/autogenerative code-driven behaviors/environments.

bah.
se.gre[p]gation is fu.tiled[Npaintedpink].

:)




.©[lick].
-
-

http://www.hotkey.net.au/~netwurker
http://www.livejournal.com/users/netwurker/

mez breeze wrote:
> ….+ how goes ur lea[ched]k.E absorption cradle?

i used to live on the gulf of mexico, but i moved up to shining rock wilderness in the shadow of cold mountain. i drive a 1985 crown victoria and it goes like this:
http://www.whitestripes.com/discs/lyrics/bigthree.html
http://tinpan.fortunecity.com/eltonjohn/802/adamant/antwords.html#square

_