TheLanguageOfNewMedia by George Shaw and Thomas Swiss

At 07:15 PM 5/08/2003 -0700, you wrote:
>http://www.iath.virginia.edu/pmc/current.issue/swiss/13.3swiss_shaw.html
>
>One of the better poems I've seen in Flash.


[my verdict: forced, predictable inter{crush}activity with l'tle payoff]

wot do u find engaging bout it, jim?

[how tweaked, illuminated, n.deed].

chunks,
mez



- pro][rating][.lucid.txt
-
-

http://www.hotkey.net.au/~netwurker
http://www.livejournal.com/users/netwurker/
_
_cr[xxx]oss ova.ring.

> At 07:15 PM 5/08/2003 -0700, you wrote:
> >http://www.iath.virginia.edu/pmc/current.issue/swiss/13.3swiss_shaw.html
> >
> >One of the better poems I've seen in Flash.
>
>
> [my verdict: forced, predictable inter{crush}activity with l'tle payoff]
>
> wot do u find engaging bout it, jim?
>
> [how tweaked, illuminated, n.deed].
>
> chunks,
> mez

I like its awareness that the interactivity and design are a part of the
language of such pieces, mez.

predictable in its interactivity? it does get beyond the mouseover.

I like what it has to say about the language of new media.

and i like the humour.

also, the design, like the stuff around the bottom of the screen, and the
windowing, is well done.

in interface design, it isn't clumsy and blinkeredly print headed.

ja

Is it just me, or is the thing way too small to read?

-e.


—– Original Message —–
From: "Jim Andrews" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 12:14 AM
Subject: RE: RHIZOME_RAW: TheLanguageOfNewMedia by George Shaw and Thomas
Swiss


>
> > At 07:15 PM 5/08/2003 -0700, you wrote:
> >
>http://www.iath.virginia.edu/pmc/current.issue/swiss/13.3swiss_shaw.html
> > >
> > >One of the better poems I've seen in Flash.
> >
> >
> > [my verdict: forced, predictable inter{crush}activity with l'tle payoff]
> >
> > wot do u find engaging bout it, jim?
> >
> > [how tweaked, illuminated, n.deed].
> >
> > chunks,
> > mez
>
> I like its awareness that the interactivity and design are a part of the
> language of such pieces, mez.
>
> predictable in its interactivity? it does get beyond the mouseover.
>
> I like what it has to say about the language of new media.
>
> and i like the humour.
>
> also, the design, like the stuff around the bottom of the screen, and the
> windowing, is well done.
>
> in interface design, it isn't clumsy and blinkeredly print headed.
>
> ja
>
>
> + ti esrever dna ti pilf nwod gniht ym tup
> -> post: [email protected]
> -> questions: [email protected]
> -> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
> -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
> +
> Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
> Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.php

what are you saying you old neologist you?
mouseover, mousedown and drag, mouseup, there is real depth here

The guitar;
the electric guitar:
the pen;
the electric pen.

ja