Re: yawn... .fwd

Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2002 01:48:41 +0000
From: jon davey <[email protected]>
To: "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: RHIZOME_RAW: yawn…

On Saturday 21 Dec 2002 10:00 pm, [email protected] wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Dec 2002, marc.garrett wrote:
>
> > This list has been hijacked by ugly anti- creative nihilists…
>
> The only anti-creative nihilist here is you :)
>
> > Many members hide behind their comps just watching,
>
> Yes, do knee-jerk them.
>
> > not wanting to get involved because their 'supposed' valid reputations
> > might get tarnished
>
> Do guilt trip them.
>
> > - yet by not acting against such an abomination,
> > being complicit in not taking any action, except pressing the 'Block
> > Sender' on their email clients;
>
> <pulls out a whole stash of government propaganda from ww2>
>
> > they contribute by ignoring the actual problem
>
> That would be because you KNOW the actual problem.
>
> > & sweeping it under the virtual carpet.
>
> And your call for censorship is NOT attempting to "sweep the problem
> under the virtual carpet of your delusions".
>
> > This place has become a battle ground
>
> It's always been.
>
> > and I do not wish to be part of a place that silenty hopes that it
> > will go away.
>
> Go ask NN about battlegrounds.
>
> > All those who are actually bothered by what has been happening, please
> > use your voice for achange - for now is the time to change this
> > dispicable problem.
>
> The only "despicable problem" is you.
>
> > I have been using my 'block sender' occassionally, in deleted mails I
> > have noticed the horrible shouts/spams by 'Karei',
>
> There haven't been any "horrible shouts/spams" by us, dear.
>
> > which has been a constant and vicious,
>
> We are not vicious.
>
> > consecutive list of attacking anyone 'they' fancy to offend,
>
> We do not "offend". Getting offended is an internally driven mechanism.
> You're simply attempting to use "getting offended" as an attempt to
> exert control. If you get offended by intelligence, then you have a
> problem.
>
> > without any comeback.
>
> Isn't that what you are attempting to do dear?
> It's cpmfortable to block, and talk trash, isn't it.
>
> > Rhizome's solution is for us all to block such activity
> > - but I cannot ignore the stench underneath.
>
> The only one "stinking" here love is you.
>
> > Action needs to be taken 'NOW'.
>
> YES, MURDER PLEASE!
>
> > I know that everyone else other than the obvious killers of joy that is;
>
> Yes, if you don't play along with Marc garret "you're a killer of joy".
> You're either with us, or against us.
>
> > are fed up with all this depressing non-stop hate parade,
>
> Dearest, the only one HATING here is you.
> We have no capacity to feel hate :)
>
> > who wish to take part in mutual sharing of ideas on their own terms.
>
> Too bad that is not what you're doing is it.
> What's wrong with our sharing OUR ideas on OUR terms?
> Nevermind. But you're not sharing ideas.
>
> > Everyone I have spoken to agrees of whom frequents this list;
>
> Lovely. Mob pressure.
>
> > but where are they now, where have they been, to stand up against such
ugliness?
>
> The only "ugliness" here comes from your own egotistical idiocy.
>
> > I long for the imaginative beauty that NN used to splurge on here in
> > comparison with the non-stop anti-creative hate that we are all forced
> > to consume.
>
> Yes, that's exactly what NN did.
>
> > At least NN was a lateral thinker - 'Karei',
>
> NN was a lateral thinker?! :)
>
> > is repetative
>
> No dearest. We are NOT repetitive.
> repetitiveness is a perceptual failure on your behalf.
> Nothing is ever twice the same. Ask NN about it.
>
>
> > and offers no work of their own,
>
> Dearest, WE_ offer work as WE see fit.
> You are not "owed" work.
>
> > putting down anyone who wishes for more than 'emptiness'.
>
> We are not putting anybody down.
> You are the only one putting anyone down.
>
> Nor are we "empty". It doesn't matter how much
> you froth at the mouth and spew infantile programmatic idiocy.
>
> > 'Kill their void'
>
> MURDER MURDER> BLOOOOOOOOOOOOOD.
>
> > respect to all who are wishing the list to be a better place…
>
> You're not capable of respect, love.
>
> And here youa re attempting to titillate them to the LAST minute.
> If they do as you want them to, they'll get respect.
>
> HA HA HA.
>
>
> + ti esrever dna ti pilf nwod gniht ym tup
> -> post: [email protected]
> -> questions: [email protected]
> -> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
> -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
> +
> Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
> Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.php
Heres a first for the list…..myself actually appreciates -||D42's input.
Are the observations not spot on almoust every time?…….there's no need to
answer that.