Re: FLUXLIST: Re: RHIZOME_RAW: Joseph McElroy

> Now on to why you DISLIKE us (and hence the murderous idiotisms).
>
> There are two forces functioning in the human : yin and yang.
> When a human is DISCERNING, NOT OPEN TO SUGGESTIBILITY, and
> CONSCIOUS, s/he acts from a great dose of YANG MALE ENERGY.
>
> That is why you "dislike" males.
>
> Unbalanced to yin humans are suggestible, would go "wow" at anything,
> are manipulable and controllable, and moreso susceptible to DELUSION.
> PARTICULARLY LOWER EMOTONAL IMPULSES DELUSION. In such a state
> their ENERGY is also accessible to be "fed on" nor can they discern
> ART from TRASH.

YANG MALE ENERGY - opinionated, stubborn, and single-minded
YIN FEMALE ENGERGY - open, optimistic, collaborative, and imagitive

Who would like someone that is all YANG?

> Those MALES have never been the "problem".

Those MALES make the problems. And I frighten the shit out of you. I am that
mountain that you cannot overcome.

joseph (cor e form art) + (porat per ance ist)
frank + lyn - mc + El + roy

go shopping -> http://www.electrichands.com/shopindex.htm
call me 646 279 2309

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER CUPCAKEKALEIDOSCOPE - send email to
[email protected]





Quoting "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" <[email protected]>:

> On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, joseph (yes) wrote:
>
> > You confrontations, like spider webs in the face, dissolve under pressure.
> Spin
> > your webs on the weak, little spiderman. A spider does not "speak"
>
> Meaningless "symbolical" drivel.
>
> Nothing of the sort is occurring babycheeks.
>
> The "symbolism" that you attempt to peddle is simply more wishful
> hallucinations on behalf of your ego.
>
> Let's get back to the subject babycheeks. The CONCRET subject :
> you. Empty. Talentless. Egotistical.
>
> Now let's reveal the real_ reason why you're doing this:
>
> Because you are a leech.
>
> And what you "want" is attachment: You'll try and "get it"
> one way or another: first you'll try to peddle "love"
> and if you're REJECTED AS WORTHLESS which is what you ARE,
> you are going to make up some idiotic stories about
> how "we are wrong and you are fighting a righteous cause".
>
> Both flip side of the same impulse. YOU WANT ATTENTION AND ENERGY.
>
> And all of your "symbolizm" is attempting to delude your audience.
>
> Now on to why you DISLIKE us (and hence the murderous idiotisms).
>
> There are two forces functioning in the human : yin and yang.
> When a human is DISCERNING, NOT OPEN TO SUGGESTIBILITY, and
> CONSCIOUS, s/he acts from a great dose of YANG MALE ENERGY.
>
> That is why you "dislike" males.
>
> Unbalanced to yin humans are suggestible, would go "wow" at anything,
> are manipulable and controllable, and moreso susceptible to DELUSION.
> PARTICULARLY LOWER EMOTONAL IMPULSES DELUSION. In such a state
> their ENERGY is also accessible to be "fed on" nor can they discern
> ART from TRASH.
>
> What WE have pointed out about you is that you attempt to "use" art
> to peddle idiocy in order to put down, degrade, PUT HUMANS TO SLEEP
> and feed on their energy.
>
>
> This my dearest is not ART. This is the domain of a CONMAN.
>
> Specifically you attempt to use "words" and "symbolism"
> as mesmeric devices, exploiting a very naive fault in the
> unconscious human brain to "superimpose" things.
>
> It's "just like, just like". Babycheeks NOTHING IS JUST LIKE.
> EVERYTHING IS EXACTLY WHAT IT IS. Not "like" WHAT IT IS.
>
> TRUE_ symbolism is in the realm of those who can SENSE and PERCEIVE
> ENERGY DIRECTLY, and that requires CONSCIOUSNESS (which you lack
> completely).
>
> To put it in "your parlance" you're an idiotic wannabe.
>
> An ignorant, talentless, imbecilic, powerless + lifeless slave
> to ego LAZY idiotic New Yorker who thinks that having a "big attitude"
> and talking "symbolic trash" (you just don't get it, you just don't
> get it) is going to SELL your trash.
>
> You RIDE on the SURFACES OF IDEAS of _MALE LEADERS_ (and we don't
> mean genders here, we mean an energetic configuration in the spirit
> of humans) who ARE authorities, IDEAS which are not YOURS, nor do
> you have a CAPACITY to UNDERSTAND least of all USHER, BE OF SERVICE TO
> or COMPREHEND to any degree (least of all "create. ha).
>
> Those MALES have never been the "problem". And the only ones who
> see a "problem" with these beings are the weak, powerless, egotistical,
> talentless whores (again we don't mean women who get paid to have
> sex or have indiscriminant sex here) "like" yourself, who can only
> "shine" by a. leeching off others energy b. attempting to ingratiate
> themselves and satellite around actual magnetic talented personages
> and be it by being "students" or "inspired by" or etc. or c.
> "rebelling against".
>
> Your "problem" is that you're a weak and powerless shithead who couldn't
> STAND ON HIS OWN FOR TWO SECONDS FLAT.
>
> And hence your "bleating about community". Only a person who can
> STAND on his OWN can give anything to a "commmunity". And a community
> is a group of INDIVIDUALS. YOU need a community in order to
> "lose yourself" "feel a rush of power" (like most asleep idiots
> who have none of their own so they "lose themselves in the
> humaaableeeeeeeeeeeeeatinity "rush") and feed on energy.
>
> You don't give a fuck about the community, if it doesn't
> serve your purposes. You cannot CREATE a community.
> But you will always BLEAT the loudest in order to attract attention.
> You will make up all sorts of shite about being "misunderstood, fragile,
> persecuted, here to save the planet, driven by noble impulses, etc.).
>
> All talk babycheeks. All talk. SHIT.
>
> That is what you are.
>
> And not an artist. Most definitely.
>
> And we will rub your face in reality CONTINUOSLY.
>
> Now "bleat' again.
>
> Tell us about your NOBLE causes.
>
> And for God's sake don't try to peddle your verbal diarrhea as
> "meaningful". It isn't. There are no "spiderwebs." No spiders.
> No "melting". This ain't a kindergarten magic class.

The ignorant ape bleated again furthermore posturing in self-importance:

> YANG MALE ENERGY - opinionated, stubborn, and single-minded
> YIN FEMALE ENGERGY - open, optimistic, collaborative, and imagitive

That is not what yang energy is, babycheeks.
Yin energy is not "open, optimistic, collaborative, and imaginative."
Spare us your infantilistic western delusions on the matter.
Optimism for example is "yang". Not Yin.
Neither "yin" nor "yang" are "collaborative".
They are mechanistic in seeking out "balancing out".
Yin will seek out yang. yang will seek out yin.
Automatically. Consciousness is something else,
and it is consciousness (which is energetic MALE,
we hope your panties are twisting :) is the only
thing capable of "collaboration". Labora, or "work"
is conscious labor.

Open your New Yorker arse, and take a look at a forest.
It is yin and yang energies in balance. They are not
"collaborating". They lack consciousness. Only humans
(in your visible range) have the capacity for
co-laboration. Not only that, but they have a BRIGHTRIGHT TO IT.

And what THIS means is that Co-LABORRATION or Co-EXISTENCE
is a matter of MUTUAL CONSENT. There are no "forced relationships".
There are no "forced friendships". We are not ALL AUTOMATICALLY
"friends".

With regards to your comment below: we are NOT afraid of you.
Quit making up idiotic stories in order to come out the "tough winner".
You're simply UNWANTED. REJECTED. And you absolutely cannot
STAND the idea of being REJECTED. All of your 'saving the world'
"mountain" stories are the ridiculous delusions of a desperate
infantile 35something sub-mediocre twit.

Allow us to restate: you're rejected. No. Negative. Nein.
Incapable. Garbage material. Understand?

Most obviously, conscious humans who have any awareness
of these concepts are vital, active, healthy, and NOT FAT.
This is not an insult by the way. Mastery of these forces
shows outwardly. Mastery also shows itself in energetic
balance, creativity proper, consciousness, incredible awareness,
understanding of universal laws, eating properly,
self-responsibility, and self-discipline, etc.

You personally are rigid, infantile, impotent, imbalanced,
irresponsible, self-important, egotistical, and fat.
And NOT WANTED :)

Mastery and understanding of yin and yang energies produces awareness
that humans get ill due to imbalances with their environment and within
themselves. Including, that arrogance is at the basis of most "modern"
diseases of the immune system. It includes awareness that damaging
others, and attempting to knee-jerk and titillate their egos produces
DAMAGE to one's own nervous and immune systems, in addition to theirs–
a concept to which you reacted with the infantile 'you're a christian
zealot, why don't you tell me how I'll go to hell".

When faced with the FACT that what we wrote is NOT christian, you simply
sidestepped the issue with more "symbolic" gibberish, instead of
accounting for your actions and admiting you are an imbecile.
Which you are.

It also produces awareness of not taking out your stress on others.
You attempt to use "art" and your audience as "punching bags".
Awareness that anger, anxiety, and similar other "weak side"
that humanity is trained to knee-jerk from rather than overcome
are major impediments for development of consciousness,
artistic creativity and sensibility, imagination, and individual
energetic and physical well being.

Anger for example is one of the major causes for certain types of
cancer. Your "luvly" "performances" "teach" humans about their
"weak" side–including teaching them to "let go of mastery of
their own psycho-sexual mechanisms" which is what YOU mean
by "optimistic and collaborative". Your idea of YIN is
sugar-fed wide-eyed naive "optimistic" yin sheep who
are all about enjoying being broken, energetically fed on,
and fucked in the ass.

You attempt to spread your delusional psychoses onto others
including the myopic idea of "males who cause problems".
There are none such.

MALES of the ENERGETIC CONFIGURATION WE SPOKE OF
(which is not YANG, and we will NOT tell you what it is
because we want your arrogance and ignorance thoroughly
apparent and on display at this point) are the PROPER
LEADERS of humanity. THEY are the ONES capable of creative
mythologizing. They are the ones holding the THREAD of
the MYTH of human (spirits & souls) in their *power*
and they are the only ONES capable of leading.

You are NOT capable of doing this: nor are you capable,
qualified or in any manner near the capacity of judging
what they should do. And your penis obsession hasn't
got anything to do with you. They are OBJECTIVELY
more powerful than YOU, annd no matter how much you
try you will NEVER be in their POSITION, you will
never be "equal" and you will not ble able to DO what they Do.
Being infantile you fancy this "related" to animalistic
idiocy, and your tiny penis feels thtreatened and unimportant–
which it is. That's why it is YOU who is threatened by them and feel a
need to "eliminate" them, so you make up idiocies about them being a
"problem". That is why you havea problem with authority as well.
A problem with FALSE authority requires DISCERNMENT, and
dear babycheeks YIN cannot DISCERN. Unconscious YIN is PASSIVE.
ALL IS THE SAME to unconscious yin.

Furthermore, YIN AND YANG are RELIGIOUS CONCEPTS.
Introduced to YOU by ENERGETIC MALE AUTHORITIES.
The same sort of MALE AUTHORITIES which according to you "cause
problems" :)

Again, you reveal your idiotic passive-aggressiveness.
You're against religion, uneducated, unqualofied, but
you're going to be "of service" by teaching all about yin and yang,
love, brotherhood, (insert christian values).
Peace brothers. Just believe in Joseph.
He's un-religious. He's a personality cultist.
Everyone be yin and undiscerning and worship at his
infantile sex obsession.

You're against powerful males who "cause problems"
yet you attempt to posture as a "mountain.

You're exactly and precisely: a con-man.

> Who would like someone that is all YANG?

Nobody is ALL YANG HERE babycheeks.
Nobody is CAPABLe of being ALL YANG.
Again the "expert" reveals his ignorance.

You have a problem with the PRESENCE OF YANG.
You want humans to be exclusively YIN,
so that they can be SUSCEPTIBLE TO SUGGESTION (juzt believe, you'll
make nice hosts for Joseph's vampiric ego), unfocused (optimistic),
undiscriminating (collaborative) and helpless (bleat).
YIN is the balancing grounds for YANG babycheeks.
There is no STRONG, ACTIVE YANG without properly balanced yin.
And your "problema" is that we are balanced.
That we are balanced, and INDEPENDENT.
Your idea of "collaboration" is better rephrased as CODEPENDENCY.
You "need" collaboration because you cant stand on your own
for shit. Collaboration is only_ between balanced INDIVIDUALS.
Everything else is codependent energetic parasitism.

There are NO males who make any problems. Your insistence
that males make problems and attempts to rally "troops"
under that flag is very much like a white middle class
racist politician who wants to rally the troops against them niggers.
Cause you see, THEM NIGGERS ARE CAUSING THE PROBLEMS.
Or how about this? THEM ISLAM FUNDAMENTALISTS ARE CAUSING THE PROBLEMS.
THEM CHRISTIANS ARE CAUSING THE PROBLEMS.
THEM AMERICANS ARE CAUSING THE PROBLEMS.
THEM JEWS ARE CAUSING THE PROBLEMS.
THEM NAZIS ARE CAUSING THE PROBLEMS.
THEM SHEEP ARE CAUSING THE PROBLEMS.

You know what babycheeks? Just like it's a natural occurrence
to have males and females, it's a natural occurrence to
have MALE LEADERS. Also some humans are better suited
for collaboration, some are BORN (energetically) to be loners.
Leaders are not loners by the way.
A conscious "community" is that which can accommodate ALL
*natural* types without attempting to break them by fitting
them into one single mould.

It's alsoa community in which sub-mediocre males don't attempt
to get attention and "power" by passive-aggressive righteous
savior beating in the chest.

Lest you didn't hear it the first time around: you have no artistic
talent. You are no mountain. Nobody is afraid of you. You're an idiot.

You're not great. You're not creative. You're not optimistic.
You're not collaborative. You are not imaginative.

You're delusional. Arrogant. Impotent. Attention seeking.

IMPINGING. In one word: a WEED.

And this is WHY You're being treateda s all WEEDS deserve to be.

xo.

Quoting "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" <[email protected]>:

Ying and Yang are two clowns hanging out in a Bejiing disco. It doesn't matter
how you want to define them, or how they have been defined in the past. They
are proproganda for an ancient worldview…I reject them…perhaps I would be
interested in a dynamic variation that grew up recently. You, however, think
you have found reality in failed viewpoints of the past. This just makes you a
failure, ineffective, and ridiculous.

What especially makes you seem ludicrous is choosing to resort to "YOUR FAT" in
your attempt to hurt me. Are you going to shoot spitballs at me next? It is
arrogant male children like you, who are sure they know REALITY, who are
destroyers of reality.

If you want to show yourself as something other than an arrogant FOLLOWER,
demonstrate a NEW evolution of practice/theory. You are not a creator, just a
destroyer and follower.

And it is obvious that you are a bigot - note - the ONLY slang term you used in
your eloquent description of MALE LEADERS was the derogatory term for humans of
African descent.

You are an incredibly UGLY person.

joseph (cor e form art) + (porat per ance ist)
frank + lyn - mc + El + roy

go shopping -> http://www.electrichands.com/shopindex.htm
call me 646 279 2309

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER CUPCAKEKALEIDOSCOPE - send email to
[email protected]





Quoting "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" <[email protected]>:

> The ignorant ape bleated again furthermore posturing in self-importance:
>
> > YANG MALE ENERGY - opinionated, stubborn, and single-minded
> > YIN FEMALE ENGERGY - open, optimistic, collaborative, and imagitive
>
> That is not what yang energy is, babycheeks.
> Yin energy is not "open, optimistic, collaborative, and imaginative."
> Spare us your infantilistic western delusions on the matter.
> Optimism for example is "yang". Not Yin.
> Neither "yin" nor "yang" are "collaborative".
> They are mechanistic in seeking out "balancing out".
> Yin will seek out yang. yang will seek out yin.
> Automatically. Consciousness is something else,
> and it is consciousness (which is energetic MALE,
> we hope your panties are twisting :) is the only
> thing capable of "collaboration". Labora, or "work"
> is conscious labor.
>
> Open your New Yorker arse, and take a look at a forest.
> It is yin and yang energies in balance. They are not
> "collaborating". They lack consciousness. Only humans
> (in your visible range) have the capacity for
> co-laboration. Not only that, but they have a BRIGHTRIGHT TO IT.
>
> And what THIS means is that Co-LABORRATION or Co-EXISTENCE
> is a matter of MUTUAL CONSENT. There are no "forced relationships".
> There are no "forced friendships". We are not ALL AUTOMATICALLY
> "friends".
>
> With regards to your comment below: we are NOT afraid of you.
> Quit making up idiotic stories in order to come out the "tough winner".
> You're simply UNWANTED. REJECTED. And you absolutely cannot
> STAND the idea of being REJECTED. All of your 'saving the world'
> "mountain" stories are the ridiculous delusions of a desperate
> infantile 35something sub-mediocre twit.
>
> Allow us to restate: you're rejected. No. Negative. Nein.
> Incapable. Garbage material. Understand?
>
> Most obviously, conscious humans who have any awareness
> of these concepts are vital, active, healthy, and NOT FAT.
> This is not an insult by the way. Mastery of these forces
> shows outwardly. Mastery also shows itself in energetic
> balance, creativity proper, consciousness, incredible awareness,
> understanding of universal laws, eating properly,
> self-responsibility, and self-discipline, etc.
>
> You personally are rigid, infantile, impotent, imbalanced,
> irresponsible, self-important, egotistical, and fat.
> And NOT WANTED :)
>
> Mastery and understanding of yin and yang energies produces awareness
> that humans get ill due to imbalances with their environment and within
> themselves. Including, that arrogance is at the basis of most "modern"
> diseases of the immune system. It includes awareness that damaging
> others, and attempting to knee-jerk and titillate their egos produces
> DAMAGE to one's own nervous and immune systems, in addition to theirs–
> a concept to which you reacted with the infantile 'you're a christian
> zealot, why don't you tell me how I'll go to hell".
>
> When faced with the FACT that what we wrote is NOT christian, you simply
> sidestepped the issue with more "symbolic" gibberish, instead of
> accounting for your actions and admiting you are an imbecile.
> Which you are.
>
> It also produces awareness of not taking out your stress on others.
> You attempt to use "art" and your audience as "punching bags".
> Awareness that anger, anxiety, and similar other "weak side"
> that humanity is trained to knee-jerk from rather than overcome
> are major impediments for development of consciousness,
> artistic creativity and sensibility, imagination, and individual
> energetic and physical well being.
>
> Anger for example is one of the major causes for certain types of
> cancer. Your "luvly" "performances" "teach" humans about their
> "weak" side–including teaching them to "let go of mastery of
> their own psycho-sexual mechanisms" which is what YOU mean
> by "optimistic and collaborative". Your idea of YIN is
> sugar-fed wide-eyed naive "optimistic" yin sheep who
> are all about enjoying being broken, energetically fed on,
> and fucked in the ass.
>
> You attempt to spread your delusional psychoses onto others
> including the myopic idea of "males who cause problems".
> There are none such.
>
> MALES of the ENERGETIC CONFIGURATION WE SPOKE OF
> (which is not YANG, and we will NOT tell you what it is
> because we want your arrogance and ignorance thoroughly
> apparent and on display at this point) are the PROPER
> LEADERS of humanity. THEY are the ONES capable of creative
> mythologizing. They are the ones holding the THREAD of
> the MYTH of human (spirits & souls) in their *power*
> and they are the only ONES capable of leading.
>
> You are NOT capable of doing this: nor are you capable,
> qualified or in any manner near the capacity of judging
> what they should do. And your penis obsession hasn't
> got anything to do with you. They are OBJECTIVELY
> more powerful than YOU, annd no matter how much you
> try you will NEVER be in their POSITION, you will
> never be "equal" and you will not ble able to DO what they Do.
> Being infantile you fancy this "related" to animalistic
> idiocy, and your tiny penis feels thtreatened and unimportant–
> which it is. That's why it is YOU who is threatened by them and feel a
> need to "eliminate" them, so you make up idiocies about them being a
> "problem". That is why you havea problem with authority as well.
> A problem with FALSE authority requires DISCERNMENT, and
> dear babycheeks YIN cannot DISCERN. Unconscious YIN is PASSIVE.
> ALL IS THE SAME to unconscious yin.
>
> Furthermore, YIN AND YANG are RELIGIOUS CONCEPTS.
> Introduced to YOU by ENERGETIC MALE AUTHORITIES.
> The same sort of MALE AUTHORITIES which according to you "cause
> problems" :)
>
> Again, you reveal your idiotic passive-aggressiveness.
> You're against religion, uneducated, unqualofied, but
> you're going to be "of service" by teaching all about yin and yang,
> love, brotherhood, (insert christian values).
> Peace brothers. Just believe in Joseph.
> He's un-religious. He's a personality cultist.
> Everyone be yin and undiscerning and worship at his
> infantile sex obsession.
>
> You're against powerful males who "cause problems"
> yet you attempt to posture as a "mountain.
>
> You're exactly and precisely: a con-man.
>
> > Who would like someone that is all YANG?
>
> Nobody is ALL YANG HERE babycheeks.
> Nobody is CAPABLe of being ALL YANG.
> Again the "expert" reveals his ignorance.
>
> You have a problem with the PRESENCE OF YANG.
> You want humans to be exclusively YIN,
> so that they can be SUSCEPTIBLE TO SUGGESTION (juzt believe, you'll
> make nice hosts for Joseph's vampiric ego), unfocused (optimistic),
> undiscriminating (collaborative) and helpless (bleat).
> YIN is the balancing grounds for YANG babycheeks.
> There is no STRONG, ACTIVE YANG without properly balanced yin.
> And your "problema" is that we are balanced.
> That we are balanced, and INDEPENDENT.
> Your idea of "collaboration" is better rephrased as CODEPENDENCY.
> You "need" collaboration because you cant stand on your own
> for shit. Collaboration is only_ between balanced INDIVIDUALS.
> Everything else is codependent energetic parasitism.
>
> There are NO males who make any problems. Your insistence
> that males make problems and attempts to rally "troops"
> under that flag is very much like a white middle class
> racist politician who wants to rally the troops against them niggers.
> Cause you see, THEM NIGGERS ARE CAUSING THE PROBLEMS.
> Or how about this? THEM ISLAM FUNDAMENTALISTS ARE CAUSING THE PROBLEMS.
> THEM CHRISTIANS ARE CAUSING THE PROBLEMS.
> THEM AMERICANS ARE CAUSING THE PROBLEMS.
> THEM JEWS ARE CAUSING THE PROBLEMS.
> THEM NAZIS ARE CAUSING THE PROBLEMS.
> THEM SHEEP ARE CAUSING THE PROBLEMS.
>
> You know what babycheeks? Just like it's a natural occurrence
> to have males and females, it's a natural occurrence to
> have MALE LEADERS. Also some humans are better suited
> for collaboration, some are BORN (energetically) to be loners.
> Leaders are not loners by the way.
> A conscious "community" is that which can accommodate ALL
> *natural* types without attempting to break them by fitting
> them into one single mould.
>
> It's alsoa community in which sub-mediocre males don't attempt
> to get attention and "power" by passive-aggressive righteous
> savior beating in the chest.
>
> Lest you didn't hear it the first time around: you have no artistic
> talent. You are no mountain. Nobody is afraid of you. You're an idiot.
>
> You're not great. You're not creative. You're not optimistic.
> You're not collaborative. You are not imaginative.
>
> You're delusional. Arrogant. Impotent. Attention seeking.
>
> IMPINGING. In one word: a WEED.
>
> And this is WHY You're being treateda s all WEEDS deserve to be.
>
> xo.

On Sat, 21 Dec 2002, joseph (yes) wrote:

> Ying and Yang are two clowns hanging out in a Bejiing disco.

No, babycheeks they are not.

> It doesn't matter how you want to define them,

Yin and yanga re not defined. They simply are.
Nor do we "want". We lack desires of such sort.
Nor do we DEFINE.

> or how they have been defined in the past.

They haven't been "defined in the past".
They simply ARE.

> They are proproganda for an ancient worldview…

No babycheeks. They are not propaganda.
It is not a worldview.. no matter how much you wishful project
it'sa worldview.. Nor is it 'ancient'.

> I reject them..

You have no capacity to "reject" objective reality babycheeks.
Do you "reject" the sun? You are simply knee-jerking
pseudo-rebelliously. "I reject, I reject".
You have no awareness of them at all.


>.perhaps I would be interested in a dynamic variation that grew up recently.

Yes, reality would revolve around your dictatorial ape brain.
Yin and yang are perfectly dynamic, love.

> You, however, think

No babycheeks. We DONT think. No matter how much you froth at the
mouth and project, project, we will not start thinking :)


> you have found reality in failed viewpoints of the past.

How lovely. The IGNORANT dictatorial ape keeps dictating
its IGNORANT wishful projection as if it is reality.
Yin and Yang in itself is not a viewpoint.
It is not an opinion babycheeks. And it's not failed.
You are not capable of judging these things.

> This just makes you a
> failure, ineffective, and ridiculous.

No babycheeks. The only "failure, ineffective, and ridiculous"
here is you. You are acting on par with a sub-mediocre high school
idiot. 'I don't get it, so I will rebel'. Add on some peer pressure
"it makes you look funny" "it makes you a failure".

Infantile ape.

> What especially makes you seem ludicrous

No dearest. We DO NOT seem ludicrious. And we are NOT ludicrous.

> is choosing to resort to "YOUR FAT" in your attempt to hurt me.

Dearest we didnt RESORT to "you are fat". You are FAT.
It's a fact. And if you had any mastery or understanding
of YIn and YANg you WOULDN'T be. But it's just so easy
to REJECt and Self-DESTRUCT than do the right thing is it not?

Nor were we interested in hurting you.
We have no such desires or intent.
We stated that.

> Are you going to shoot spitballs at me next?

No, that is what YOu are doing, love.
"I REJECT YIN AND YANG"
"YOU LOOK LUDICROUS"
"YOU ARE A FAILURE"

Pointing out that humans with mastery of yin & yang are
not fat is not an attack. fatness is a condition similar
to ignorance. It's "curable". But it must be recognized
in order to be cured. Stating yoir fatness or your ignorance
is only an attack if you live in a world of self-delusion.

While you live in self-delusion you cannot, of your own volition,
be of service. This is not a "point of view".

> It is arrogant

Babycheeks we lack arrogance completely.
The only one arrogant here is you.
And you are arrogant enough to fancy that you are capable
of perceiving anything outside of your ego, despite
plentiful evidence to the contrary.

You're indeed catatonic.

> male children like you,

Male is not an insult babycheeks.
And none of us here are children.
The "children juz playing" here are you.
We are sure you have a "problem"
with confident male children, however.

They'd laugh at you and point : the emperor has no clothes.

> who are sure they know REALITY,

We are not "sure we know REALITY".
We Do know it.

> who are
> destroyers of reality.

No babycheeks. Reality cannot be destroyed.
Your simpletonistic ignorant drivel knows no end.
Nothing is "destroyed" except the chance for conscious development.
And you do that.

When will you stop with your ignorant cheap attempts at character
assassination because we have pointed out EXACTLY how ignorant
and idiotic you are?



> If you want to show yourself

We are not interested in "showing ourselves".
What you want is "proof". You want humans to act as bitches ona "leash"
to your brain.
Sorry. Nobody owes you any proofs.
Shove your cheap attemptsa t "guilt" "shame' passive-aggressiveness"
control.

> as something other than an arrogant

We have not showed ourselves as an arrigant follower, babycheeks.
We are NOT an arrogant follower.

> FOLLOWER,

Talk about infantilism. Leaders just sit around waiting to be
knee-jerked by cheap attempts of passive-aggressive leash pulling by the
above. That's laughable.

Leaders babycheeks do not PROVE themselves to your idiotic brains.
Nor do they care about OPINIONS of others.

> demonstrate a NEW evolution of practice/theory.

Therea re no NEW evolutions babycheeks.
Nor are we here to "demonstrate; anything to you.
You're truly egotistically catatonic aren't ya?
Who are you Joseph? Exactly who are you?
The only one who needs to "demonstrate' anything baycheeks
IS YOU. YOU need to demonstrate yourself worthy. TO The universe.

And you aren't.

You simply are NOT.

You will receive nothing.

And you are not WORTHY of having anything "shown" to you.

Don't even think about trying to turn this aroundm you idiotic
passive-aggressuve egotist. :)

> You are not a creator, just a
> destroyer and follower.

babycheeks. We are a creator.
We are not a DESTROYER nor are we are FOLLOWER.
Nor are there any PROBLEMS with FOLLOWERS.
Humansa re created as FOLLOWERS in the majority.
And that is just fine. Follower is not an "unworthy" position.

Avoid using slapstick labeling in order to elicit proofs.
This is simply an attempta t a mindfuck game.

We dont think you heard it so far, so let us tell you
again.

YOU ARE REJECTED.
YOU WILL RECEIVE NOTHING.
YOU WILL BE SHOWN NOTHING.
NOTHING WILL BE SHOWN TO YOU.
And this will not LESSEN IN ONE BIT WHAT WE ARE.

On the contrary, you're evidencing yourself more and more
UNFIT. Passive aggressive. Idiotic.

Do you really think that leaders exest so that they can
"prove themselves" to you? Or anyone?

The only responsibility ANY human being, a leader or a follower, has
is to its INTENT. And INTENT doesnt care about your brain.
It doesn't give a damn about "proofs". Its demands are far greater,
yet its a private contract. Between human and intent.

NOBODY owes you anything.

Not only do you need the "bleating" community to FEED ENERGETICALLY ON,
but you attempt standard bleating community tactics. It's called
PEER PRESSURE IN THE US, isn't IT?

When one starts PROVING one removes its center of action from INTENT
into the BRAIN and becomes susceptible to mind-control games,
as well as functioning properly.

This ain't a yin yang theory.
It's a FACT.

And gee wiz, you want humans to start proving themselves to YOUR
BRAIN (because the world revolves around your dick) and step
away from their INTENT (path, strength).

Is this part of the teaching them to be weak programy babycheeks?

You just cannot STAND an independent person whose existence
and value doesnt revolve around you CAN YOU?

VALUE is self-evident.
Your lack of ability to perceive it is your own simpleton problem.

> And it is obvious that you are a bigot

No dearest. Nothing of the sort is obvious.
We are not a BIGOT. You are simply trying
a simpleton character assassination trick
(again and again).

the only BIGOT here is you babycheeks.
You are the one who fancies that "THIS KIND OF HUMANS ARE MAKING
PROBLEMS".
This kind of humans have been : christians, independent individuals,
male yang leaders, male children, etc.
These are your OWN WORDS.
THIS_ is bigotry.
There are no "groups of humans" who "cause the problems".
You are simply projecting your own PROBLEMS OUTWARDLY
and bashing others for them.

Rather to the contrary, we have pointed out, and repeatedly,
that there is no "type of humans who cause problems".
And that problems are caused by individual ignorance.
That humans are STRONG and can OVERCOME those problems.
We have in fact stated on numerous occasions
that anyone who wants to do the WORK can do it.
One does not have to be a "leader".

> - note - the ONLY slang term you used in
> your eloquent description of MALE LEADERS

We didn't use it in a description of MALE LEADERS.
We used it in a description of YOU.


> was the derogatory term for humans of
> African descent.

Yes, and we used the word to illustrate their behaviors.
That is not "reflective" of our us.
There are in fact humans existing who advocate LITERALLY
that "niggers are the problem".
Our stating that doesn't make us a bigot.

> You are an incredibly UGLY person.

No dearest, the only UGLY person here is you.
You are narcissistic, selfish, arrogant,
an energetic leech, ignorant, idiotic,
murderous and masochistic.

You LIE that your performances are "shamanic."
You attempt to "reject" and "dismiss" teachings
which you do not understand.
You attempt to feed on others energy.
You attempt to force_ your "relationship".
You dismiss FACTS about human emotional well-being
with some cheap "labels" of us being "ridiculous"
just so that you can wash your hands clean from
the contiuous murder that you are_ commiting.

CONSCIOUSNESS is not some 'ancient teaching'.

It would be hard to look at an artist in the duration
of the entire 20c of any significance who hasn't
addressed the issue.

There is nothing "new". NEW is a delusion of the
brain and the sensorial "apparatus". Reality
exists outside of time.

We have presented you with a large number of representative

writers
artists
performance artists
musicians
both western and eastern.

Tell us again how all shamans should be killed.
That was marvellous.

Or maybe even the Buddha should be killed?

What do you say, why don't you stockpile all "ancient outdated
and FAILED worldviews (the egotistical moron never realizing
that it is him who is FAILING and not those systems)" and the
churches, and the mosks, and the books, and paintings,
and the lot of it and burn it.

Then you can invite marc garret and you can attempt to emotionally
kneejerk everybody, appeal to their infantile sexuality by attempts
to control it (after all, one wouldn't WANT independent humans
WOULD ONE?) and start teaching us allabout "luv" and "brotherhood.

Then you can kill 845783478597489574 jews, and just
wash your hands off. You could say that they wanted it.
Or that they deserved it. Or that it didn't happen at all?

At the bottom of it all Joseph, the hideous idiot here is you.
You have denied ALL responsibility for any of your idiocies.
You have attempted to blindly BASH anything put in front of you.

And your problem with YANG energy is that humans are not controllable
when in yang state. They are simply NOT. Whether followers or not.

As for the ancient "outmoded worldview" homosexual gay magic
is two-yang. It's absolutely not controllable at all.
Hence Monsieur Hitler killed them off. We suppose it still worked
in 1940s.

Here is Yin and Yang used for fortune telling …

http://www.fortuneangel.com/5EBasic.htm

Gives you shivers, doesn't it.


joseph (cor e form art) + (porat per ance ist)
frank + lyn - mc + El + roy

go shopping -> http://www.electrichands.com/shopindex.htm
call me 646 279 2309

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER CUPCAKEKALEIDOSCOPE - send email to
[email protected]





Quoting "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" <[email protected]>:

> On Sat, 21 Dec 2002, joseph (yes) wrote:
>
> > Ying and Yang are two clowns hanging out in a Bejiing disco.
>
> No, babycheeks they are not.
>
> > It doesn't matter how you want to define them,
>
> Yin and yanga re not defined. They simply are.
> Nor do we "want". We lack desires of such sort.
> Nor do we DEFINE.
>
> > or how they have been defined in the past.
>
> They haven't been "defined in the past".
> They simply ARE.
>
> > They are proproganda for an ancient worldview…
>
> No babycheeks. They are not propaganda.
> It is not a worldview.. no matter how much you wishful project
> it'sa worldview.. Nor is it 'ancient'.
>
> > I reject them..
>
> You have no capacity to "reject" objective reality babycheeks.
> Do you "reject" the sun? You are simply knee-jerking
> pseudo-rebelliously. "I reject, I reject".
> You have no awareness of them at all.
>
>
> >.perhaps I would be interested in a dynamic variation that grew up recently.
>
> Yes, reality would revolve around your dictatorial ape brain.
> Yin and yang are perfectly dynamic, love.
>
> > You, however, think
>
> No babycheeks. We DONT think. No matter how much you froth at the
> mouth and project, project, we will not start thinking :)
>
>
> > you have found reality in failed viewpoints of the past.
>
> How lovely. The IGNORANT dictatorial ape keeps dictating
> its IGNORANT wishful projection as if it is reality.
> Yin and Yang in itself is not a viewpoint.
> It is not an opinion babycheeks. And it's not failed.
> You are not capable of judging these things.
>
> > This just makes you a
> > failure, ineffective, and ridiculous.
>
> No babycheeks. The only "failure, ineffective, and ridiculous"
> here is you. You are acting on par with a sub-mediocre high school
> idiot. 'I don't get it, so I will rebel'. Add on some peer pressure
> "it makes you look funny" "it makes you a failure".
>
> Infantile ape.
>
> > What especially makes you seem ludicrous
>
> No dearest. We DO NOT seem ludicrious. And we are NOT ludicrous.
>
> > is choosing to resort to "YOUR FAT" in your attempt to hurt me.
>
> Dearest we didnt RESORT to "you are fat". You are FAT.
> It's a fact. And if you had any mastery or understanding
> of YIn and YANg you WOULDN'T be. But it's just so easy
> to REJECt and Self-DESTRUCT than do the right thing is it not?
>
> Nor were we interested in hurting you.
> We have no such desires or intent.
> We stated that.
>
> > Are you going to shoot spitballs at me next?
>
> No, that is what YOu are doing, love.
> "I REJECT YIN AND YANG"
> "YOU LOOK LUDICROUS"
> "YOU ARE A FAILURE"
>
> Pointing out that humans with mastery of yin & yang are
> not fat is not an attack. fatness is a condition similar
> to ignorance. It's "curable". But it must be recognized
> in order to be cured. Stating yoir fatness or your ignorance
> is only an attack if you live in a world of self-delusion.
>
> While you live in self-delusion you cannot, of your own volition,
> be of service. This is not a "point of view".
>
> > It is arrogant
>
> Babycheeks we lack arrogance completely.
> The only one arrogant here is you.
> And you are arrogant enough to fancy that you are capable
> of perceiving anything outside of your ego, despite
> plentiful evidence to the contrary.
>
> You're indeed catatonic.
>
> > male children like you,
>
> Male is not an insult babycheeks.
> And none of us here are children.
> The "children juz playing" here are you.
> We are sure you have a "problem"
> with confident male children, however.
>
> They'd laugh at you and point : the emperor has no clothes.
>
> > who are sure they know REALITY,
>
> We are not "sure we know REALITY".
> We Do know it.
>
> > who are
> > destroyers of reality.
>
> No babycheeks. Reality cannot be destroyed.
> Your simpletonistic ignorant drivel knows no end.
> Nothing is "destroyed" except the chance for conscious development.
> And you do that.
>
> When will you stop with your ignorant cheap attempts at character
> assassination because we have pointed out EXACTLY how ignorant
> and idiotic you are?
>
>
>
> > If you want to show yourself
>
> We are not interested in "showing ourselves".
> What you want is "proof". You want humans to act as bitches ona "leash"
> to your brain.
> Sorry. Nobody owes you any proofs.
> Shove your cheap attemptsa t "guilt" "shame' passive-aggressiveness"
> control.
>
> > as something other than an arrogant
>
> We have not showed ourselves as an arrigant follower, babycheeks.
> We are NOT an arrogant follower.
>
> > FOLLOWER,
>
> Talk about infantilism. Leaders just sit around waiting to be
> knee-jerked by cheap attempts of passive-aggressive leash pulling by the
> above. That's laughable.
>
> Leaders babycheeks do not PROVE themselves to your idiotic brains.
> Nor do they care about OPINIONS of others.
>
> > demonstrate a NEW evolution of practice/theory.
>
> Therea re no NEW evolutions babycheeks.
> Nor are we here to "demonstrate; anything to you.
> You're truly egotistically catatonic aren't ya?
> Who are you Joseph? Exactly who are you?
> The only one who needs to "demonstrate' anything baycheeks
> IS YOU. YOU need to demonstrate yourself worthy. TO The universe.
>
> And you aren't.
>
> You simply are NOT.
>
> You will receive nothing.
>
> And you are not WORTHY of having anything "shown" to you.
>
> Don't even think about trying to turn this aroundm you idiotic
> passive-aggressuve egotist. :)
>
> > You are not a creator, just a
> > destroyer and follower.
>
> babycheeks. We are a creator.
> We are not a DESTROYER nor are we are FOLLOWER.
> Nor are there any PROBLEMS with FOLLOWERS.
> Humansa re created as FOLLOWERS in the majority.
> And that is just fine. Follower is not an "unworthy" position.
>
> Avoid using slapstick labeling in order to elicit proofs.
> This is simply an attempta t a mindfuck game.
>
> We dont think you heard it so far, so let us tell you
> again.
>
> YOU ARE REJECTED.
> YOU WILL RECEIVE NOTHING.
> YOU WILL BE SHOWN NOTHING.
> NOTHING WILL BE SHOWN TO YOU.
> And this will not LESSEN IN ONE BIT WHAT WE ARE.
>
> On the contrary, you're evidencing yourself more and more
> UNFIT. Passive aggressive. Idiotic.
>
> Do you really think that leaders exest so that they can
> "prove themselves" to you? Or anyone?
>
> The only responsibility ANY human being, a leader or a follower, has
> is to its INTENT. And INTENT doesnt care about your brain.
> It doesn't give a damn about "proofs". Its demands are far greater,
> yet its a private contract. Between human and intent.
>
> NOBODY owes you anything.
>
> Not only do you need the "bleating" community to FEED ENERGETICALLY ON,
> but you attempt standard bleating community tactics. It's called
> PEER PRESSURE IN THE US, isn't IT?
>
> When one starts PROVING one removes its center of action from INTENT
> into the BRAIN and becomes susceptible to mind-control games,
> as well as functioning properly.
>
> This ain't a yin yang theory.
> It's a FACT.
>
> And gee wiz, you want humans to start proving themselves to YOUR
> BRAIN (because the world revolves around your dick) and step
> away from their INTENT (path, strength).
>
> Is this part of the teaching them to be weak programy babycheeks?
>
> You just cannot STAND an independent person whose existence
> and value doesnt revolve around you CAN YOU?
>
> VALUE is self-evident.
> Your lack of ability to perceive it is your own simpleton problem.
>
> > And it is obvious that you are a bigot
>
> No dearest. Nothing of the sort is obvious.
> We are not a BIGOT. You are simply trying
> a simpleton character assassination trick
> (again and again).
>
> the only BIGOT here is you babycheeks.
> You are the one who fancies that "THIS KIND OF HUMANS ARE MAKING
> PROBLEMS".
> This kind of humans have been : christians, independent individuals,
> male yang leaders, male children, etc.
> These are your OWN WORDS.
> THIS_ is bigotry.
> There are no "groups of humans" who "cause the problems".
> You are simply projecting your own PROBLEMS OUTWARDLY
> and bashing others for them.
>
> Rather to the contrary, we have pointed out, and repeatedly,
> that there is no "type of humans who cause problems".
> And that problems are caused by individual ignorance.
> That humans are STRONG and can OVERCOME those problems.
> We have in fact stated on numerous occasions
> that anyone who wants to do the WORK can do it.
> One does not have to be a "leader".
>
> > - note - the ONLY slang term you used in
> > your eloquent description of MALE LEADERS
>
> We didn't use it in a description of MALE LEADERS.
> We used it in a description of YOU.
>
>
> > was the derogatory term for humans of
> > African descent.
>
> Yes, and we used the word to illustrate their behaviors.
> That is not "reflective" of our us.
> There are in fact humans existing who advocate LITERALLY
> that "niggers are the problem".
> Our stating that doesn't make us a bigot.
>
> > You are an incredibly UGLY person.
>
> No dearest, the only UGLY person here is you.
> You are narcissistic, selfish, arrogant,
> an energetic leech, ignorant, idiotic,
> murderous and masochistic.
>
> You LIE that your performances are "shamanic."
> You attempt to "reject" and "dismiss" teachings
> which you do not understand.
> You attempt to feed on others energy.
> You attempt to force_ your "relationship".
> You dismiss FACTS about human emotional well-being
> with some cheap "labels" of us being "ridiculous"
> just so that you can wash your hands clean from
> the contiuous murder that you are_ commiting.
>
> CONSCIOUSNESS is not some 'ancient teaching'.
>
> It would be hard to look at an artist in the duration
> of the entire 20c of any significance who hasn't
> addressed the issue.
>
> There is nothing "new". NEW is a delusion of the
> brain and the sensorial "apparatus". Reality
> exists outside of time.
>
> We have presented you with a large number of representative
>
> writers
> artists
> performance artists
> musicians
> both western and eastern.
>
> Tell us again how all shamans should be killed.
> That was marvellous.
>
> Or maybe even the Buddha should be killed?
>
> What do you say, why don't you stockpile all "ancient outdated
> and FAILED worldviews (the egotistical moron never realizing
> that it is him who is FAILING and not those systems)" and the
> churches, and the mosks, and the books, and paintings,
> and the lot of it and burn it.
>
> Then you can invite marc garret and you can attempt to emotionally
> kneejerk everybody, appeal to their infantile sexuality by attempts
> to control it (after all, one wouldn't WANT independent humans
> WOULD ONE?) and start teaching us allabout "luv" and "brotherhood.
>
> Then you can kill 845783478597489574 jews, and just
> wash your hands off. You could say that they wanted it.
> Or that they deserved it. Or that it didn't happen at all?
>
> At the bottom of it all Joseph, the hideous idiot here is you.
> You have denied ALL responsibility for any of your idiocies.
> You have attempted to blindly BASH anything put in front of you.
>
> And your problem with YANG energy is that humans are not controllable
> when in yang state. They are simply NOT. Whether followers or not.
>
> As for the ancient "outmoded worldview" homosexual gay magic
> is two-yang. It's absolutely not controllable at all.
> Hence Monsieur Hitler killed them off. We suppose it still worked
> in 1940s.

Quoting "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" <[email protected]>:

> As for the ancient "outmoded worldview" homosexual gay magic
> is two-yang. It's absolutely not controllable at all.
> Hence Monsieur Hitler killed them off. We suppose it still worked
> in 1940s.

If you want a date, why don't you just ask? Course I would definitely say
no…that is a rejection.

joseph (cor e form art) + (porat per ance ist)
frank + lyn - mc + El + roy

go shopping -> http://www.electrichands.com/shopindex.htm
call me 646 279 2309

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER CUPCAKEKALEIDOSCOPE - send email to
[email protected]

On Sun, 22 Dec 2002, joseph (yes) wrote:

> Here is Yin and Yang used for fortune telling …
>
> http://www.fortuneangel.com/5EBasic.htm
>
> Gives you shivers, doesn't it.


Standard trick: find humans who abuse concepts
and present that abuse as the real thing.

Yin and YANG ARE EVIL PROPAGANDA!

Babycheeks, just because there are idiots out there
misusing things in ignorance "badness" doesn't follow.

Come on do KNEE-JERK THEM on FEAR.

Do wave a boogeyman. Do it.

:)

On Sun, 22 Dec 2002, joseph (yes) wrote:

> If you want a date, why don't you just ask?

Dearest babycheeks, nobody is solicting you.
We don't have any interest in you at all.

> Course I would definitely say no…that is a rejection.

Oh is THAT how it is? You just won't let it go
until it's all made to look as if you rejected
wouldn't you? :)

You were never solicited babycheeks.

Infantile idiot.