Re: [thingist] portraet of 'performance doll' mcElroy

Quoting "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" <[email protected]>:

> The impotent idiot regards others as 'objects'.
>
> Precis. Glad you wrote that.
>
> Because this is exactly the 'service' you provide with your
> 'performances'.

There are no objects.

joseph (cor e form art) + (porat per ance ist)
frank + lyn - mc + El + roy

go shopping -> http://www.electrichands.com/shopindex.htm
call me 646 279 2309

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER CUPCAKEKALEIDOSCOPE - send email to
[email protected]





Quoting "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" <[email protected]>:

> On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, joseph (yes) wrote:
>
> > The 'force' you feel
>
> No dear. We feel no 'force'. You have attempted to force_
> your friendship. That doesn't imply the presence of
> force on your part. Attempted_.
>
> > comes from your (various individuals) own insecurity.
>
> We have no insecurities love. You're simply
> wishfully projecting again.
>
>
> > You do not understand why I would choose to be a friend,
>
> You are_ not_ a friend. Friendship is a mutual consent kind of thing.
> You're not capable_ of friendship. You're simply a leech.
>
> > though you refuse friendship,
>
> Because you're an idiot who cannot take no for an answer, baby.
>
> > and assume I have motives not particulaly friendly and thus
> > "perceive" what I do as a forcefulness.
>
> We don't perceive any forcefulness. We perceive an impotent
> attempts_ at force. We assume_ nothing. We observe you as you are.
> Maybe one of these days you'll 'get' that frienndship is something
> that requires mutual recognition an consent.
>
> > I am playing for no other reason than you are there to play with.
>
> No, dear. Nobody is 'there to be played with'.
> Humans are not objects, and they possess sentience and consent.
> Even small children know to ask for consent before playing.
>
> > Perhaps you are a rag doll
>
> The rag doll here is you baby.
> A rag doll to your ego.
>
>
> > and I am the cat that will tear you to shreds?
>
> Justified destruction of others, yes?
>
> Tak.
>
> Do you actually have an ounce of intelligence left?
>
> > If so, the child that owns you should not have left you alone.
>
> The impotent idiot regards others as 'objects'.
>
> Precis. Glad you wrote that.
>
> Because this is exactly the 'service' you provide with your
> 'performances'.