The human is created to function in balance.
When functioning properly it combines
negative + positive (electromagnetic) energies
(regardless of gender dear Alan, regardless of gender)
to produce a third or 'life-force'. When acting
from the latter one is neither 'negative'
nor 'positive' + creates around itself an
energetic shield which prevents it from
being consumed.
All of Alan Sondheim's abuse of attempted
interaction so far have been attempts to
created imbalance by seeking cultural
programmatic, genetic, instinctual,
brain, or emotional identifications.
Paired with 'destruction of foundations'.
Tak.
Brief examination of 'his' websites reveal
such activities present in 'his' 'work'
altogether. Such activities are 'designed'
+ can have one + only one effect : a
disbalanced human being, which is energetically
weak, consumable + incapable of conscious
development. In other words, energetic
murder + slavery.
Are we still amused?
Tak.
+ Also Alan Sondheim employs cheap tactics
which do not really_ work save for unconscious,
asleep humans (those who unable to defend themselves)
suffering from a particular type of cultural
conditioning observable in his_ cultural
background (ie, Alan Sondheim = programmed
murderous ape). In other words, a very unconscious
Alan Sondheim has been programmed to self-destruct
+ destroy other humans who exist on the level of
helpless children. In return, Alan Sondheim is given
the delusional satisfaction of the jolt of a temporarily
'expanding' (inflated) ego (self-importance) + 'power'
which 'he's' a slave to, seeking continuous 'next hit'.
All in the meanwhile, laughing, laughing.
The monotone 'minimal' chord of 'humanity'.
Still amused, Alan?
`, . ` `k a r e i' ? ' D42
Alan Sondheim + murder
-
Type: discussion
Comments
Alan is a brilliant writer, one of the best anywhere, it seems to me, and it isn't in him to
mean anybody harm, Karei. I thought I'd say that because he is new to this list, although I'm
fairly new to it myself. He takes writing in exciting directions every day and he is very
sincere in his passion and love of ideas and art. And artistic freedom. So, please, let's allow
each other human dignity.
If we're really interested in art, his is an important voice to read and, yes, argue with, and
he's hard to argue with, no doubt about it, but he is serious about ideas and art, there are
none more serious and devoted, and that is important on these lists, to the vitality of them as
forums for discussion and testing of ideas in dialogue with those who actually give a damn. Alan
does.
ja
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Jim Andrews wrote:
> Alan is a brilliant writer,
Worthless opinion.
> one of the best anywhere,
Hardly.
> it seems to me,
Worthless opinion.
> and it isn't in him to mean anybody harm, Karei.
What I wrote is accurate + precise observation of Alan Sondheim,
dearest. Your naivete + blindness is your own problem.
> I thought I'd say that because he is new to this list,
And that excuses his behavior no doubt. Poor little Alan
who is attempting thievery + murderous drivel.
What a saint.
> fairly new to it myself. He takes writing in exciting directions
> every day
No, he doesn't. He simply juggles words in pre-programmed
fashions.
> and he is very sincere in his passion and love of ideas and art.
Alan Sondheim is not anywhere near art.
He is not sincere. He's dictatorial, brain-obsessed and oblivious.
Sincerity implies awareness of Self.
> And artistic freedom.
Artistic 'freedom' is not irresponsible drivel passed on as art.
> So, please, let's allow each other human dignity.
Spare us meaningless emotional knee-jerks.
Perhaps it's not registering with you so I'll write it again:
what was written about Alan Sondheim was precise_ + accurate.
Avoid attempting to pull delusions over our eyes.
> If we're really interested in art, his is an important voice to read
No, he isn't.
> and, yes, argue with,
Arguing is fot brain-obsessed illiterate apes.
> he's hard to argue with, no doubt about it,
No, he isn't. Arguing is a simpleton mechanism.
> but he is serious about ideas and art,
Drivel + drivel. Alan Sondheim is incapable of art.
> there are none more serious and devoted,
Absolute schlock.
> and that is important on these lists, to the vitality of them as
> forums for discussion and testing of ideas in dialogue with those who actually give a damn. Alan
> does.
Oh yes. One fat + bloated 'ego' is very important.