'feedback loop of 'consciousness'

>
> > > > yes, you are
> > >
> > > Facile finger pointing.
> >
> > and you
>
> No, sorry. I am not the wishful projections inside your brain.

wrong AGAIN

> Not at all.
>
> > > No, I am not 'disappointed'. Your wishful projections
> > > are meaningless. And there was no compliment.
> >
> > yes you are …
>
>
> Sorry, I am not the dlusions inside your brain.

yes, you are sorry

>
> > and yes there was … and again, thanks for the compliment
>
> There was no compliment. Debase yourself again?

yes there was, and again … thanks

>
> > >
> > > > liar
> > >
> > > As above: calling me a 'liar' isn't going to get you out of
> > > responsibility.
> >
> > you lied …
>
> No, I didn't lie. Your e-mails are available to read.
> Citing your own words, if you_ don't like somebody
> or some entity (corporation) you should have a right to
> appropriate and abuse their property (such as logos, trademarks, etc.)
> Additionally, according to your ignorant self, any image that enters
> public domain is public property–ie, you wish to freeload on other
> humans work.

whacked logic from a clever spindoctor and liar – take your filter off.
here is the original post with my reply:

–K wrote–
> Furthermore, you expressed an incessant desire to see that
> that violation of basic human rights, brutality, ignorance,
> and debasement and devaluation of humans be passed on as
> governmentally enforced laws.

–David replied–
liar"


>
> > > So, care to explain why you fancy that violation of basic human
> > > rights should be passed on as a governmentally supported function?
> >
> > care to explain why you favor the violation of basic human rights?
>
> I don't favor violation of basic human rights, dearest.

yes, you do

> Rather the opposite, which is why I am not letting you off the hook with
> your idiocy.

more twisted logic from a twisted [online persona]

>
>
> > >
> > > > in EVERY way
> > >
> > > More impotent knee-jerks.
> >
> > wrong AGAIN
>
> No, sorry. I have never been 'wrong' with regards to you

yes you have … you've NEVER been right

in particular,
> nor will I be

yes … you always will be

, no matter how much you stomp your feets and froth at the
> mouth. You are an ignorant,

wrong AGAIN

>weak imbecile,

wrong AGAIN

who wants to enforce
> his imbecility on the world by means of brute force.

wrong AGAIN

Whatever David
> doesn't LIKE, david has a right to abuse, and the US constitution will
> support that. Not likely.

wrong AGAIN. your interpretations are sooo weak.

>
> > >
> > > > > can you do something besides self-debase and scream?
> > > >
> > > > thanks for asking
> > >
> > > Evidence is : no.
>
> > > I'm not sure in what delusional bubble you live in, but what impulse
> > > drives your 'artistic posturing' is quite evident. You want to
destroy
> > > and misuse that which
> >
> > wrong AGAIN
> >
> > a. has more power than you
> >
> > wrong AGAIN
> >
> > b. you have no ability
> > > to understand
> >
> > wrong AGAIN
> >
> > c. cannot create
> >
> > wrong AGAIN
> >
> > d.threatens your ego.
> >
> > wrong AGAIN
> >
> > >
> > > And even worse, you fancy this self-debasory behavior 'victorious'.
> >
> > wrong AGAIN
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Rather to the opposite: you're revealing yourself to be the
ignorant,
> >
> > wrong AGAIN
> >
> > > immature brain obsessed ape who is spastically hung up on
> > > 'controlling' and 'murdering'.
> >
> > wrong AGAIN
> >
> >
> > >
> > > so entertain us all and say it again: wrong AGAIN.
> >
> > ibid
>
> Right. You did it so many times, yet I am still not wrong.

yes, you are

>
> So entertain us all, and say it again, you know you want to.

wrong AGAIN. i'm just relpying to your lies and misinterpretations.
i keep my replies short and to-the-point so you don't get too confused.


>
> + be me
> -> post: [email protected]
> -> questions: [email protected]
> -> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
> -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
> +
> Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
> Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.php
>

On Tue, 5 Nov 2002, David Goldschmidt wrote:

> > No, sorry. I am not the wishful projections inside your brain.
>
> wrong AGAIN

The man who shot himself in the foot by screaming 'wrong AGAIN'.
There have been more pitiful ends.

> > Sorry, I am not the dlusions inside your brain.
>
> yes, you are sorry

It's a matter of polite speech, dearest. That's all.

> >
> > > and yes there was … and again, thanks for the compliment
> >
> > There was no compliment. Debase yourself again?
>
> yes there was, and again … thanks

No dearest, there was no compliment.
But I can see how you can be so starved that you hallucinate them.

> whacked logic


No logic dearest.

> from a clever spindoctor and liar

There is no 'spindoctoring' or 'lying'.
Keep your myopic projections to yourself.

> – take your filter off.

Nor filtering.
> here is the original post with my reply:
>
> –K wrote–
> > Furthermore, you expressed an incessant desire to see that
> > that violation of basic human rights, brutality, ignorance,
> > and debasement and devaluation of humans be passed on as
> > governmentally enforced laws.
>
> –David replied–
> liar"

No this was not the original post; however it's quite obvious who is
trying to be a 'spin doctor'.

> > I don't favor violation of basic human rights, dearest.
>
> yes, you do

Only in your deluded wishful soastic impotence.

> > Rather the opposite, which is why I am not letting you off the hook with
> > your idiocy.
>
> more twisted logic from a twisted [online persona]

There is no 'twisted' logic nor 'twisted' personas.


> > No, sorry. I have never been 'wrong' with regards to you
>
> yes you have … you've NEVER been right

Au contraire.

> in particular,
> > nor will I be
>
> yes … you always will be

Only in your deluded brain.

> , no matter how much you stomp your feets and froth at the
> > mouth. You are an ignorant,
>
> wrong AGAIN
>
> >weak imbecile,
>
> wrong AGAIN
>
> who wants to enforce
> > his imbecility on the world by means of brute force.
>
> wrong AGAIN
>
> Whatever David
> > doesn't LIKE, david has a right to abuse, and the US constitution will
> > support that. Not likely.
>
> wrong AGAIN. your interpretations are sooo weak.

These are no interpretations, nor are they weak.
These are your own words.


> > So entertain us all, and say it again, you know you want to.
>
> wrong AGAIN. i'm just relpying to your lies and misinterpretations.

No dearest. You're simply in denial.
There have been no lies nor misinterpretations.
You made a bunch of ignorant idiot statements,
now have the courage to take the responsibility for them.

> i keep my replies short and to-the-point so you don't get too confused.

No dearest, you simply 'deny' anything.

Come on, do the 'wrong AGAIN' trick :)

On Tue, 5 Nov 2002, -IID42 Kandinskij @27+ wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Nov 2002, David Goldschmidt wrote:
>
> The man who shot himself in the foot by screaming 'wrong AGAIN'.
> There have been more pitiful ends.

Theatre -> Fire!



The 12hr-ISBN-JPEG Project >>>> since 1994 <<<<

+ + + serial ftp://ftp.eskimo.com/u/b/bbrace
+ + + eccentric ftp://ftp.idiom.com/users/bbrace
+ + + continuous hotline://artlyin.ftr.va.com.au
+ + + hypermodern ftp://ftp.rdrop.com/pub/users/bbrace
+ + + imagery ftp://ftp.pacifier.com/pub/users/bbrace

News: alt.binaries.pictures.12hr alt.binaries.pictures.misc
alt.binaries.pictures.fine-art.misc alt.12hr

. 12hr email
subscriptions => http://bbrace.laughingsquid.net/buy-into.html


. Other | Mirror: http://www.eskimo.com/~bbrace/bbrace.html
Projects | Reverse Solidus: http://bbrace.laughingsquid.net/
| http://bbrace.net


{ brad brace } <<<<< [email protected] >>>> ~finger for pgp

On Tue, 5 Nov 2002, { brad brace } wrote:

> > The man who shot himself in the foot by screaming 'wrong AGAIN'.
> > There have been more pitiful ends.
>
> Theatre -> Fire!

Fire: free with Hell ™.

`, . ` `k a r e i' ? ' D42