Re: G2K revolution - answer to Eryk on why

On Mon, 14 Oct 2002 [email protected] wrote:

> Actually Eryk, it is an ideological war.

No dearest. Idology hasn't got anything to do with it.
Your myopic idiot-ape misinterpretations haven't got anything
to do with it.

> K is distancing himself from humanity,

Hahaha. Distancing 'himself from humanity'. Ignorant idiot.

> I am trying to be more human.

No, you're trying to be ape-like.

> So I set out to 'piss him off',

You couldn't possibly 'piss me off' love.
Secondly, pissing another human off is degrading the human.
Destructive + murderous ape-behavior.

> to get him to make extra efforts to insult me,

Nobody is insulting you, you self-important twit.
Insult is a self-reflected narcissistic function.
Idiot.

> to demonstrate his humanity.

I have no humanity. Nor could you demonstrate that.

> I succeeded when he sent the email,

No, you didn't. You only flatter yourself in doing so.

> unsolicited and without reference,

Completely solicited and based on your behavior. Ape.

> comparing me to a dog chasing its tail.

I wasn't comparing you, love. That is what you ARE.


> After that, it was anticlimatic and I just went to bed.

Of course it was. Impotent idiot.

> Of course K will now chime in

I don't 'chime in' twit.

> to claim this is all inaccurate and untrue, but that doesn't matter.

It certainly does matter; you're a self-delusional twit.
Your psychotic ego-induced fantasies have no relation to reality.

> So, from my standpoint it was a war/game/competition

It wasn't, DOG. That is your delusion (chasing your tail).

> that I was out to 'win'. And I did.

No, you didn't. You're simply self-delusional.

> You could ask why this occured in public. For me, it is a
> performance

This is no more performance than an idiot taking a shit.

> that is documented in an online repository that at some point in
> the future will be useful,

No, dearest. The only one subject to research here is you :)

> such as research into early 21st century culture.

Of which you're incapable. Asleep narcissistic idiot.

> I try to make people break out of their carefully constructed personnas

Start with yourself, luv. You're so asleep, you might never wake up.

> for a moment and call me names,

Nobody has been calling you names. Ape, idiot, and the like are accurate
words applicable to you. All else is projection.

Secondly, people don't break up out of their personnas' by being driven
angry–which is what you WERE attempting–they are being
DEGRADED and MURDERED. And you are attempting to self-laudate
for your incongruous imnecility. Revolting scum.

> these are very telling and moments of honesty.

No they aren't.

> And I don't go for the easy targets,

Yes, you do. You go for the EASIEST targets.
Making people angry–which typically causes ego implosions as well–
is the EASIEST way to hurt & damage asleep humans.
You are a cheap, murderous, self-important brute.
Don't confuse my intolerance for such idiots
as yourself with 'name calling' and 'breaking out of personnas'
and all sorts of other idiotic shit you try to ascribe to yourself.

What you do is what you DO. Not what you'd like to con yourself and
others into thinking you're doing.


> like politics or religion, but those personal quirks we all have,

There is no 'we'. Nor do we all have personal quirks'.
Making humans angry is not a personal quirk, it's attempting
to push-button humans who are not awake.

> which makes us human.

'We' are not all human dearest. You can stomp all you want,
but I_ dearest am not human. And haven't been for a while.
Your myopic projections of emotional charges where there aren't
any is imply your animal brain attempting to grapple with
things which do not 'register' paired with an insistent
masochistic desire to degrade self (and others).


> For K, it took a long time to find his point of weakness

You found no 'point of weakness' Twit.

> since he has a very carefully constructed personna.

Sheer idiocy. This is not a 'persona'.

> I found that he hates

I 'hate' not dearest. This is yoyr own myopic projection.

> to be commanded to do anything

Couldn't be further from reality. Humans simply CANNOT be commanded.
Attempts to command humans are simply attempts to CRIPPLE them.
I have no tolerance for such crap, and hatred hasn't got anything to
do with it.


> and he feels it necessary to respond to anything addressed to him.

I don't 'feel necessary*. YOu simply haven't a clue what is going on at
all.

> So my RESPOND TO ME was a command that he,

RESPOND TO ME was you crippling your brain. It wasn't a command.

> by his own nature, had to follow.

No dearest. Nobody 'followed your commands' except for in your
masochistic deluded ego.


> It also attacks his ideology with its egotistical nature.

I have neither ideology nor ego.

> It pissed him off so much

Sorry. You never pissed me off. You'r a delusional moron.

> that he had try to find someway to humiliate me

Haha. Right, doggie. You were self-humiliating, that is all.
Nobody tried to humiliate you. Paranoud imbecile.


> - thus the dog chasing tail self portrait,

No dearest. that was a PORTRAIT of what you were doing TO YOURSELf
with your 'attempts to command'.

> which by the way had RESPOND TO ME in the subject line.

NO kidding. I can't imagine why.


> It is one of the best representations of anger that I have seen.

Only in your myopic paranoud imagination was there any anger.
My words are devoid of any emotional charges.

> Much better than NN (who wasn't angry, just defensive)

NN wasn't 'defensive' nor are you qualified to judge her in any way.

> but not quite as colorful as Patrick's Nazi Eskimo (who was more frustrated than angry).

Humans are not comparable. Ape.

> Now usually after I have pissed someone off,

You haven't pissed anyone off.

> a rapport can be developed

Yeah. After you damage and degrade the human, you establish the typical
sadom-masochistic mutrual crippling relationship that most contemporary
humans term 'friendship. In your case, you feed energetically by
licking the wound. You did it PLENTY of times to Max, and you
continuously hover around ANYONE.

Except for you never managed to 'piss me off' or even get close.

> - however, I don't think it will happen with K - he clings very hard to
> his protective coating.

What a shame. The vulture LOST, couldn't feed, and now is sobbing.

> And we differ a great deal on world view.

You and I certainly do. You're a vampiric idiotic & asleep scum
who humiliates, damages and feeds on humans. Not only that
but you're a complete and thorough masochistic con-man.
You've conned yourselfSO HARD that nobodycan wake you
out of your idiotic slumber, and to make matters worse
you run around damaging others.

Cowardly, weak, and stupid.


> However, my RESPOND TO ME was also an invitation for him to be open
> and listen,

I am LISTENING dearest. And I've already written plentifully on the
subject matter. LISTENING is not what you wanted.
You wanted IDENTIFICATION with the brain and control & manipluation
via verbal-thought misuse of the brain.
Idiotic scum.

> to respond to what is actually written

I am responding to what is ACTUALLY WRITTEN.
You dearest want FLAT IDENTIFICATION with the SURFACE you want to
present. You want humans to swallow your crap. This is not
listening.


> instead of preaching

Nobody is preaching here except you. Twit.


> based upon what he thinks he heard.

I don't think, twit. What I SAW is exactly + precisely
what you are. maybe it's time you SHED OFF your ego-persona.
As for 'hearing' you're not a transmitter.
You're dead + asleep.



> This explanation is part of the performance.

No, the explanation is part of self-jusification for your delusion.

> Joseph
> Hey K - RESPOND TO ME!

You're tlaking to yourself. Dog.