Wasilisa in land of mind spagheti

On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, manik wrote:

> Brain,as a scientificly constructed object,could not be anything alse exept
> object for education and creatid mind in general sense:gnosis and praxis.

Nonsense. Gnosis is not received in the brain.

> Knowlege,power and I are triple rooth of mind problematization.

Not at all.

> Mind is in disjunction between loocking and talking.

Not at all.

> Gnostic have only one argument against sceptic;

Gnostics don't bother with arguments, luv.

later.

`, . ` `k a r e i' ? ' D42

this is yummy mindy and body arguments these are
stills from a video i am working on. — manik
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Brain,as a scientificly constructed object,could not
> be anything alse exept
> object for education and creatid mind in general
> sense:gnosis and praxis.
> Knowlege,power and I are triple rooth of mind
> problematization.But,based on
> knowlege,as a problem,thinking mean to look,and to
> speak.Mind is in
> disjunction between loocking and talking.Ewery time
> we hawe to find their
> relation.
> Gnostic have only one argument against
> sceptic;sceptic indifference is fols
> when they chose bread insted rock,for eat.That
> argument made the world go
> around,permanent production from food to
> weapon…Term ethic is something
> like ghost- body suporting life and compromise all
> history of ,so
> caled,