on 9/9/02 9:45 AM, -IID42 Kandinskij @27+ [email protected] ecrit :
> Surviving the devastation of World War II, Beuys […]
I thought that was'nt proven & It was only a myth?? Anyone know bout this?
-muserna
bomber beuys
-
Type: discussion
Comments
well,
an ancient nenette shaman knows,
rmrmmmmmmmmm.
kandinsky knows i guess.
–
OG
-/ and now, back to our "finger in the bounioule" programme ! /-
—– Original Message —–
From: "Pet Name" <[email protected]>
To: "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 12:41 AM
Subject: RHIZOME_RAW: bomber beuys
> on 9/9/02 9:45 AM, -IID42 Kandinskij @27+ [email protected] ecrit
:
>
> > Surviving the devastation of World War II, Beuys […]
>
>
> I thought that was'nt proven & It was only a myth?? Anyone know bout this?
>
>
> -muserna
>
> + If the reader will keep me company I shall be glad.
> -> post: [email protected]
> -> questions: [email protected]
> -> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
> -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
> +
> Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
> Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.php
>
On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Pet Name wrote:
> > Surviving the devastation of World War II, Beuys […]
>
>
> I thought that was'nt proven & It was only a myth?? Anyone know bout this?
I've no idea–but also I suspect we have a different attitude towards
'myths'–maybe. Especially since proofs are not a valid path of
discerning reality–and a rather awry, 'cheap' substitute for
verification–if this makes sense to you.
`, . ` `k a r e i' ? ' D42
On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, clement Thomas wrote:
> well,
> an ancient nenette shaman knows,
yep.
> rmrmmmmmmmmm.
> kandinsky knows i guess.
yep. and i'm not telling.
slighting stances are not 'humorous'
I like my humor real, not debasing or cowardly.
`, . ` `k a r e i' ? ' D42