Community recommendations for Commissions

Dear Rhizomers,

Last year, during our 2006-07 Commissions cycle, we had some productive
conversations on this list about how the process could be altered to benefit
the applicants and voting members. Some of the suggestions that arose here
were integrated into this year's cycle, and I wanted to report back to you
about them.

For the first time, we are offering a commission to a 'Community Project'
that is geared towards enhancing the communication, participation or
experience of the site. We feel this is a way for the community to
participate in the its own structure, and we look forward to seeing what
ideas come in! We have also increased the number of commissions the Member
vote awards, up from one to three, bringing the jury to member ratio to 8:3.


Another issue that arose last year was participants feeling like their works
were being judged by the written descriptions, and not by their actual
websites. To offset this, we shortened the possible text on the submission
page, and put a voting tool on the actual website.

We have outlined the entire process clearly on our Submissions and Voting
Procedures page:
http://rhizome.org/commissions/2007/procedures.php

For all those who contributed to the discussion, thank you! We look forward
to this year's cycle.

All the best, Lauren

Executive Director
Rhizome at the New Museum
www.rhizome.org