Philip Galanter
Since the beginning
Works in United States of America

BIO
generative artist using installation, video, audio, and print

also faculty member at Texas A&M

also writer exploring complexity theory, art theory

also curator for generative, robotic, complexity, and tech art

for more please visit http://philipgalanter.com
Discussions (27) Opportunities (0) Events (0) Jobs (0)
DISCUSSION

Internet2: Orchestrating the End of the Internet?


(Please consider for Rare/Digest to correct factual errors.)

A few days ago Jon Ippolito posted a sort of manifesto positing
Internet2 as a threat to the kind of internet artists and academics
would like to continue to use.

I know Jon a bit from my MARCEL involvement and elsewhere. Jon's a
really smart guy with a keen gift for deft rhetoric, and I am sure he
means well.

Unfortunately Jon's post invokes several basic misunderstandings of
the related technologies. These confusions are no mere technical
quibbles. They are fundamental to the central thesis that somehow
the Internet2 effort may bring about the death of the internet.

This couldn't be more wrong.

I'll let the basic facts, as corrected in the following, speak for themselves.

>By this July, every DVD player and TiVo box will sniff for a
>"broadcast flag" that prevents it from copying digital TV
>broadcasts. This hardware intervention effectively destroys even the
>possibility of fair use, since artists and educators cannot
>transform, parody, or criticize what they cannot record.* The
>broadcast flag does not prevent making recordings for time shifting
>or other personal "fair use".

This is simply not true. There are hairs to be split, but basically
(1) the broadcast flag only applies to over-the-air broadcasts (not
cable, satellite, or internet streaming), and (2) it will not prevent
copying for fair use. For example, you will still be able to record
over-the-air broadcast TV shows at home for later use.

The broadcast flag system *will* prevent large scale redistribution,
i.e. massive piracy. But this has always been illegal...even in the
era of videotape.

http://www.engadget.com/entry/1234000717032165/

>The technology behind Internet2 *breaks* anything remotely
>resembling a broadcast business model, which is why the MPAA will do
>its best to disarm the technology by installing Digital Rights
>Management directly in its routers to stop interesting content from
>ever getting into the pipeline.

Again, this is simply not true. Router level digital rights
management is not being considered by any of the internet standards
bodies. It's not even over the horizon. However, the current
worldwide internet upgrade from IPv4 to IPv6 *does* make multicast an
intrinsic part of the protocol rather than an add-on. And multicast
is *exactly* the technology a broadcast model needs.

But multicast also benefits "the little guy" because in principle
independent artists will no longer have to pay for increased server
capacity as their audience grows. The shared network, rather than
the server, will distribute the stream to as many viewers as are
interested.

So if anything, "broadcast" related technical changes in Internet2
(and eventually other networks) will serve as a democratizing
equalizer.

And by the way, IPv6 multicast has *no* built-in Digital Rights
Management. None. And routers under IPv6 remain "dumb" contrary to
implications otherwise.

(As a footnote, multicast is also the enabling protocol technology
that makes the Access Grid, MARCEL's current platform of choice,
possible.)

http://www.tcpipguide.com/free/t_IPv6MulticastandAnycastAddressing.htm

>For all its talk of community and access, Internet2 seems to be
>offering a backwards-thinking hierarchic model of culture, a sort of
>Great Performances meets Reality TV.

Again...not true. Reasonable people can disagree when it comes to
matters of esthetic taste, but contrary to Jon's central thesis
Internet2 technology remains both content and application agnostic.

Elsewhere he mentions "privileged" isochronous channels. But
isochronous channels don't, and can't, even exist under either IPv4
or IPv6 or on either Internet2 or "internet1".

The ability to quickly create improvised collaborative groups was
recognized as being among the highest application priorities in the
earliest pre-planning of Internet2. Application level efforts such
as the Internet2 Commons, VRVS, and indeed the very Access Grid
technology that MARCEL depends on, are some of the fruit of this
early vision.

Today on Internet2 non-hiearchical social interaction isn't
speculation...it's already well established standard practice.

And when it comes to Internet2 *content* people are free to do what
they will. If one finds the current crop of artistic efforts to be
wanting the best, and entirely invited, response is to go out and
create something better.

To sum up, there is simply no factual basis for any Internet2 vrs
MARCEL conflict.

And I personally look forward to working further with both!

DISCUSSION

Robots put on Talent Show - ArtBots First of a Kind


Press Release

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Robots put on Talent Show - ArtBots First of a Kind

NEW YORK CITY, NY - May 16, 2002 (artbots.org)- Battlebots, stand at
ease - a kinder, gentler, more creative robot has arrived. In fact a
number of "ArtBots" are getting together in New York City, and with a
little help from their human friends, they've decided to put on a
show.

The first annual ArtBots: The Robot Talent Show will take place from
noon to 6:00 p.m. at the Pratt Institute in Brooklyn on Saturday, May
25th. A hybrid combining aspects of both a juried art exhibition and
a traditional talent show, more than a dozen artists, engineers and
tinkerers will contribute to this high-tech, high-concept, high-fun
one-day event.

Unlike the destructive and dimwitted radio-controlled cars on
steroids made popular by TV shows like Battlebots and Robotwars,
ArtBots are creative, autonomous robots more interested in making art
than wreaking havoc. Some Artbots are musicians; but don't mention
the word "musicbox," lest they take offense! Each musical ArtBot has
its own style and technique for making music. Other ArtBots are
visual artists and will demonstrate their drawing and painting
prowess for the crowd. Then there are the ArtBots whose talents are a
bit harder to nail down; you might call them cybernetic performance
artists!

Curator Douglas Irving Repetto notes "The reach of robotics is
expanding rapidly, not only in traditional domains like manufacturing
but also in fields like sports, medicine, and the arts. Being artists
who often work with technology, we wanted to find a way to highlight
some of the terrific work that's being done in the world of robotic
art. Robots have developed a popular reputation as a highly
competitive and often aggressive bunch; our proposal is that robots
are what you make of them. And we'd prefer our robots to make art."

Co-Curator Philip Galanter adds "We want this to be fun for the whole
family. But this is also serious fun. ArtBots represents the emerging
intersection of computer technology, sculpture, mechanical
engineering, and generative art. ArtBots is a robot talent show, but
for the time being it requires humans who can cross boundaries to
make it happen."

ArtBots includes among its sponsors the Columbia University Computer
Music Center, the New York University Arts Technology Group, the
Pratt Institute Industrial Design Program, the Madagascar Institute,
and the Robotics Society of America.

Additional Details:

Cost: this is a FREE event
Date: Saturday, May 25
Time: Noon to 6:00 p.m.
Location: Pratt Studios Building
Pratt Institute, 200 Willoughby Ave. (near Hall st.),
Brooklyn, New York
Pratt Inst. Phone - 718-636-3600
Nearest Subway: G Train - Clinton-Washington station

Additional information, including schedules, directions to the event,
and information about the participants is available at:
http://artbots.org

# # #