Martin John Callanan is an artist whose work spans numerous mediums and engages both emerging and commonplace technology. His work has included translating active communication data into music; freezing in time the earth’s water system; writing thousands of letters; capturing newspapers from around the world as they are published; taming wind onto the internet and broadcasting his precise physical location live for over two years.
Martin's work is always decidedly deadpan and served with a dash of ennui. Some of his more well-known pieces include Letters 2004-2006 published by Book Works, the ambient audio installation Sonification of You, the meta-news aggregator I Wanted to See All the News From Today and Text Trends, which abstracts the casual manner in which we receive, scan and process information and language on a daily basis.
Martin's work has been exhibited, published and screened at venues throughout Europe, Russia, North America, South America, Asia and Australia. Participating with, among others, Es Baluard Modern and Contemporary Art Museum, Moscow International Film Festival, Ars Electronic Centre, ISEA 2010, FutureEverything, Museum of Contemporary Art of Vojvodina, Riga Centre for New Media Culture, UCL Environment Institute, Science Museum (London), Tate Britain, Folly Festival of Digital Culture, Book Works, The Institute for Modern and Contemporary Culture, File Prix Lux, and in several editions of the FILE Electronic Language International Festival in Brasil.
Martin is currently:
- Teaching Fellow in Fine Art Media (Digital Media & Print) at the Slade School of Fine Art, University College London and a member of Slade Centre for Electronic Media in Fine Art (SCEMFA) and Word Image research group.
- Editor, Leonardo Electronic Almanac
- Publisher, Merkske
http://greyisgood.eu
Re: RHIZOME_RAW: second life dramas
Salvatore's own argument fails. If he did this under a bridge no one would
pay any notice. If he did the same in an gallery, event, (or anywhere public
that isn't his mother's house)...
The Frieze Art Fair is in London next week - I'll pay your entrance to see
you have your teeth kicked in after you try your crazy shit there.
On 7/10/07 02:16, "Lee Wells" <lee@leewells.org> wrote:
> Lets just say I would rather hear you modified the IBM Plaza in SL than
> caused trouble within a local creative autonomous zone.
>
> I don't believe Marcel Duchamp ever vandalized other artists works.
> What Pierre Pinoncelli did to the urinal last year with the hammer was and
> now he is stuck having to deal with over $200,000 in fines.
> Will he make the dada history books? Maybe...
>
> All in all its a negative in my opinion.
>
>
>
>> From: salvatore iaconesi <xdxd.vs.xdxd@gmail.com>
>> Reply-To: <salvatore.iaconesi@fastwebnet.it>
>> Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2007 02:56:57 +0200
>> To: Lee Wells <lee@leewells.org>
>> Cc: Rhizome <list@rhizome.org>
>> Subject: Re: RHIZOME_RAW: second life dramas
>>
>> Lee Wells ha scritto:
>>> Good point....but I guess it would all depend on if Odyssey a free for all
>>> collaboration zone or if its someone's art project in secondlife that they
>>> have dedicated time and effort to produce and now need to spend more time
>>> and effort to fix your alterations. I say do it in real life if you really
>>> want to be avant garde.
>>>
>>
>>
>> and maybe i do. have a doubt?
>>
>> just a point i need to assess: either you embrace a perspective or you
>> don't.
>>
>> the "immaterial" brings on concepts. It is plain narrow-minded to take
>> only the things you like.
>> it's like liking water because it quenches your thirst, but closing your
>> eyes to the fact that you get wet with it if you spill it.
>>
>> it's like all the issues on copyright, and on peer2peer, and on netowrk
>> neutrality.
>> Or, going back to art: artisans vs artists and everything that came back
>> after that "stuff" duChamp brought inside the galleries.
>>
>> technologies+society (don't get me wrong, a paintbrush is a technlogy,
>> too) enable ways of thought.
>>
>> a cute story, which has just a little to do with the "second life drama" :)
>>
>> maurizio cattelan was once invited to a collector's house to make a
>> proposal for a commission. While chatting and discussing he was shown
>> into the private exhibit of the collector.
>>
>> having seen all the paintings and other artworks, as soon as they
>> stopped he placed the proposal: "open up your exhibition room's windows.
>> Flies will enter it. I will smack them on the paintings with my trusty
>> fly-squatter, and that will be the artwork: the flies splatted on the
>> canvases"
>>
>>
>> (don't knw if it's true or not. could be just a little legend. but i
>> like it in more than one way.)
>>
>
>
> +
> -> post: list@rhizome.org
> -> questions: info@rhizome.org
> -> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
> -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
> +
> Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
> Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.php
>
Re: RHIZOME_RAW: illogical and costly new entry conditions
In reality, no physical format of any kind should be employed in either the
pre-selection or screening of a major short film festival.
- Physical formats are heavy, cumbersome, and most importantly; obsolete.
- Physical formats are labour intensive for reviewing, especially such great
numbers.
- Physical formats are fragile, and degenerate easily if handled
incorrectly.
- Precious global resources are wasted on manufacturing one-time use media.
- Re-use and recycling are troublesome.
- Freighting 6000 entries across the world is both staggeringly inefficient
and wasteful of time, money, and shared global resources.
- The world is already too full of physical objects.
- The above is expedited by the fact the festival is of short films; waste
per gram is higher due to less data on standard sized media.
- the Internet is open to all: if you can make the film you have access to
the Internet. The internet is efficient, paper-less and object-less, and
more importantly allows instantaneous communication of data.
The internet, and online, is a perfect solution for pre-selection, and even
suitable for transmission of data to compile screening versions. The
festival would need suitable technologies, but these would both make the
festival more efficient and have less negative impact to international
communities. Many of your administrations could be automated into the same
system; such as reviewing pre-selection, automatic checking of correct
submission formats, keep all submission materials in one place, sending
emails to applicants, sharing clips online to engage visitors... The list is
only terminated by a lack of imagination.
Please discuss with other international short film festivals already engaged
in online practices for several years.
Please clarify your procedures for reuse of the media, from this year's
festival, minimising the negative impact on global resources. For example;
they should be blanked and donated to your local university or media
college, and not returned across the world.
Please take steps to review your produces for submission in physical formats
for the future.
regards
Martin John Callanan
On 30/9/07 22:32, "Myriam Thyes" <myriam@thyes.com> wrote:
> Dear Mr. Gass, dear festival team,
>
> the Intl. Short Film Festival Oberhausen is big, important, well
> known and popular - and I know that you receive more entries every
> year - last year it seems you got around 6000 films.
>
> In order to reduce this amount of entries though, I think you chose
> the wrong way by favoring old-fashioned technical standards.
>
> I understand that for preview you accept DVDs only.
> But the following is not logical and too costly:
>
> On the one hand, you accept ONLY DVDs as entries, but you DON
Re: RHIZOME_RAW: Media Arts for the ICA Web Site
http://arts.guardian.co.uk/art/news/story/0,,2157927,00.html
At least this highlights a previous over dependence.
Sustainability and knowledge are more important than vaporous marketing.
Re: RHIZOME_RAW: Media Arts for the ICA Web Site
- examples.
If the ICA was engaged in supporting and promoting open-source work or CC
licensed work, my arguments would be a bit different. But this discussion
was originally started because the are not doing so.
If they support everyone, open to all, no quality control, you end up with a
useless mess: http://saatchi-gallery.co.uk/
You have to be selective to promote quality. Selections being made by those
with the knowledge to. You have to be selective to promote an idea or a
message. Publish everything and what you have is value-less and meaningless.
Recognition; I suggest you meant endorsement. A endorsement that what has
been created is better than others; that it adds to contemporary discussion
more so than most...
A token payment because in a consumerist society everything has a value and
requires money. A token payment allows survival/ resources for the
development of more ideas. (or enough to treat friends who let you sleep on
their sofas).
An organisation, such as the ICA, should wish to help [financially] support
an individual as an investment - and sign of belief /faith - in the reasons
for having originally chose to endorse them. If the artist's work develops
more, then the orgisation's prestige increases in the future, having
supported the artist early on. So the token amount can be seen as an
investment. It also helps develop the future, which the ICA claims as it's
role: "A belief in the new. An enduring faith in the creativity of
tomorrow."
Positively supporting an artist opens the door for the organisation to work
with that individual more in the future. Otherwise, they will favour an
organisation that did.
Ultimately, it's up to an individual to chose to submit work to the ICA; or
not. My suggestion is that the way they have chosen to do this, undermines
their own aims of spotting and supporting the best. The best isn't going to
be submitted in the first place.
On 26/9/07 23:07, "Lee Wells" <lee@leewells.org> wrote:
> Even if they were to get that much together that only allows for 12 artists
> to receive the award.
>
> In reference to your energy to conceive and develop something worthy....well
> I don't think you are the person they are looking for. They are after those
> that have already created something with their blood sweat and tears and now
> just need the recognition. 500 pounds would be great but again its only 3-5
> days wage any way so what does it really matter to receive the token payout.
>
>
>> From: Martin John Callanan <m@greyisgood.eu>
>> Reply-To: Martin John Callanan <m@greyisgood.eu>
>> Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 22:24:01 +0100
>> To: Pall Thayer <pallthay@gmail.com>, rhizome raw <list@rhizome.org>
>> Subject: Re: RHIZOME_RAW: Media Arts for the ICA Web Site
>>
>> The ICA get points for trying; points for doing something. But it's plainly
>> wrong for an organisation such as the ICA to offer no fee; even tokenistic.
>>
>> Sa, they have one new web project a month for a year, even a token 500
>> pounds (3-4 days work for on average London wage) is an annual budget of
>> 6000. If they can't secure a grant for that amount then they simply have
>> employed the wrong people. I'm sure a corporate hire for a night generates
>> more income than that. There must be a corporation willing to donate 6000
>> against their tax bill. It's the ICA's responsibly to secure funding to
>> nurture and develop new talent and new ideas. Their aim to to support "the
>> best".
>>
>> If I'm working 9-5 for the average wage [to survive]; I would not have the
>> energy to conceive - then develop - something worthy of the ICA.
>>
>> Prestige works both ways if the ICA do their task correctly and pick the
>> right works: "ICA is home to the best new art and culture from Britain and
>> around the world." prestige flows back to them in the medium-long term. The
>> artist gaining the short-term prestige.
>>
>>
>>
>> My only fear is destined to become something ridiculous - and ultimately
>> pointless - like the saatchi-gallery website. That, my friends, is a
>> shameful website in every respect.
>>
>> Sadly, certainly in the last five years, the ICA has been following trends,
>> not creating / supporting the contemporary ...
>>
>>
>> M
>>
>>
>>
>> On 26/9/07 21:18, "Pall Thayer" <pallthay@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Actually lots of competitions do have prize money - why
>>>> don't the ICA do that?
>>>
>>> That was my thought. I guess, in retrospect, perhaps it wasn't fair of
>>> me to slam them for wanting to show the work without remuneration. A
>>> lot of institutions do that but what's really pushing the limit is
>>> their, albeit non-exclusive, right to show the work as often as they
>>> please. Perhaps my perspective on this has been distorted after having
>>> spent time in Canada where they have the excellent CARFAC fee system
>>> requiring galleries to pay artists a fee for exhibiting their work.
>>> But none the less, I am still disappointed in the ICA. My art practice
>>> is more than a hobby and prestige doesn't feed my kids.
>>>
>>> Pall
>>>
>>> On 9/26/07, dave miller <dave.miller.uk@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> It's great you're having this debate. Lots of new media arts
>>>> competitions work in the same way- they call for work and don't reward
>>>> the artists for including it in a show or festival, so I don't think
>>>> the ICA are behaving very differently. The ICA probably feel they are
>>>> helping artists enough by selecting and showing the work (it's a
>>>> privelege) but it would be great if they supported artists
>>>> financially. Actually lots of competitions do have prize money - why
>>>> don't the ICA do that? They can certainly afford it, with all their
>>>> corporate sponsorship.
>>>>
>>>> On 26/09/2007, Joseph Gray <josephgray@grauwald.com> wrote:
>>>>> The ICA is supposed to be so important that you should be willing to shell
>>>>> out money to them to show your work. It's a prestige thing (?!).
>>>>>
>>>>> Of course, most of us have our own websites and methods of sharing the
>>>>> work with the rest of the world.
>>>>>
>>>>> The call looked interesting at first, but then I, as you did, became
>>>>> turned off by the particular verbiage. The ICA will use the net.show as a
>>>>> way to secure more grants and such. The artists won't see a penny.
>>>>> Typical.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The writer Pall Thayer writ:
>>>>> E Sounds great, just one thing. As I was looking through the text at the
>>>>> E site linked to from the post, one line in particular caught my eye.
>>>>> E
>>>>> E "Please note that there is no fee for the work that is accepted for
>>>>> E inclusion on the web site."
>>>>> E
>>>>> E At first I thought, oh good, there's no submission fee. But then as I
>>>>> E re-read it I thought, no, they want artists to give them their work!
>>>>> E Is the ICA really so cheap that they can't pay artists for the work
>>>>> E that they exhibit? Someone please tell me I'm reading this wrong.
>>>>> E
>>>>> E If it is the case, that they're not going to pay the artists anything,
>>>>> E then this line *really* tops off the insult:
>>>>> E
>>>>> E "The ICA will retain an indefinite non-exclusive license to make the
>>>>> E work available through its website, and retain an archive of all
>>>>> E chosen submissions."
>>>>> E
>>>>> E Pall
>>>>> E
>>>>> E On 9/26/07, neme.org <nemeorg@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> E> The ICA is launching a call for submissions of web-based Media artworks
>>>>> E> to be shown on the ICA website: submissions are currently open until 24
>>>>> E> Oct.
>>>>> E>
>>>>> E> To complement our existing Live and Media Arts programme, we are
>>>>> looking
>>>>> E> for work that is innovative, either in technique or ideas. The work we
>>>>> E> are looking for doesn't necessarily have to be 'interactive', but it
>>>>> E> must be work that engages with the user.
>>>>> E>
>>>>> E> Submissions are open to anyone who wants to show a piece of web-based
>>>>> E> work that they are proud of or that exemplifies their skills as an
>>>>> E> artist. It should be a relatively recent or new piece of work that
>>>>> E> hasn't yet been launched or shown on an institutional or gallery
>>>>> E> website.
>>>>> E>
>>>>> E> More info can be found on
>>>>> E>
>>>>> E> http://neme.org/main/700/media-arts-for-the-ica-web-site
>>>>> E> +
>>>>> E> -> post: list@rhizome.org
>>>>> E> -> questions: info@rhizome.org
>>>>> E> -> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
>>>>> E> -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
>>>>> E> +
>>>>> E> Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
>>>>> E> Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.php
>>>>> E>
>>>>> E
>>>>> E
>>>>> E --
>>>>> E *****************************
>>>>> E Pall Thayer
>>>>> E artist
>>>>> E http://www.this.is/pallit
>>>>> E *****************************
>>>>>
Re: RHIZOME_RAW: Media Arts for the ICA Web Site
wrong for an organisation such as the ICA to offer no fee; even tokenistic.
Sa, they have one new web project a month for a year, even a token 500
pounds (3-4 days work for on average London wage) is an annual budget of
6000. If they can't secure a grant for that amount then they simply have
employed the wrong people. I'm sure a corporate hire for a night generates
more income than that. There must be a corporation willing to donate 6000
against their tax bill. It's the ICA's responsibly to secure funding to
nurture and develop new talent and new ideas. Their aim to to support "the
best".
If I'm working 9-5 for the average wage [to survive]; I would not have the
energy to conceive - then develop - something worthy of the ICA.
Prestige works both ways if the ICA do their task correctly and pick the
right works: "ICA is home to the best new art and culture from Britain and
around the world." prestige flows back to them in the medium-long term. The
artist gaining the short-term prestige.
My only fear is destined to become something ridiculous - and ultimately
pointless - like the saatchi-gallery website. That, my friends, is a
shameful website in every respect.
Sadly, certainly in the last five years, the ICA has been following trends,
not creating / supporting the contemporary ...
M
On 26/9/07 21:18, "Pall Thayer" <pallthay@gmail.com> wrote:
> Actually lots of competitions do have prize money - why
>> don't the ICA do that?
>
> That was my thought. I guess, in retrospect, perhaps it wasn't fair of
> me to slam them for wanting to show the work without remuneration. A
> lot of institutions do that but what's really pushing the limit is
> their, albeit non-exclusive, right to show the work as often as they
> please. Perhaps my perspective on this has been distorted after having
> spent time in Canada where they have the excellent CARFAC fee system
> requiring galleries to pay artists a fee for exhibiting their work.
> But none the less, I am still disappointed in the ICA. My art practice
> is more than a hobby and prestige doesn't feed my kids.
>
> Pall
>
> On 9/26/07, dave miller <dave.miller.uk@gmail.com> wrote:
>> It's great you're having this debate. Lots of new media arts
>> competitions work in the same way- they call for work and don't reward
>> the artists for including it in a show or festival, so I don't think
>> the ICA are behaving very differently. The ICA probably feel they are
>> helping artists enough by selecting and showing the work (it's a
>> privelege) but it would be great if they supported artists
>> financially. Actually lots of competitions do have prize money - why
>> don't the ICA do that? They can certainly afford it, with all their
>> corporate sponsorship.
>>
>> On 26/09/2007, Joseph Gray <josephgray@grauwald.com> wrote:
>>> The ICA is supposed to be so important that you should be willing to shell
>>> out money to them to show your work. It's a prestige thing (?!).
>>>
>>> Of course, most of us have our own websites and methods of sharing the
>>> work with the rest of the world.
>>>
>>> The call looked interesting at first, but then I, as you did, became
>>> turned off by the particular verbiage. The ICA will use the net.show as a
>>> way to secure more grants and such. The artists won't see a penny.
>>> Typical.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The writer Pall Thayer writ:
>>> E Sounds great, just one thing. As I was looking through the text at the
>>> E site linked to from the post, one line in particular caught my eye.
>>> E
>>> E "Please note that there is no fee for the work that is accepted for
>>> E inclusion on the web site."
>>> E
>>> E At first I thought, oh good, there's no submission fee. But then as I
>>> E re-read it I thought, no, they want artists to give them their work!
>>> E Is the ICA really so cheap that they can't pay artists for the work
>>> E that they exhibit? Someone please tell me I'm reading this wrong.
>>> E
>>> E If it is the case, that they're not going to pay the artists anything,
>>> E then this line *really* tops off the insult:
>>> E
>>> E "The ICA will retain an indefinite non-exclusive license to make the
>>> E work available through its website, and retain an archive of all
>>> E chosen submissions."
>>> E
>>> E Pall
>>> E
>>> E On 9/26/07, neme.org <nemeorg@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> E> The ICA is launching a call for submissions of web-based Media artworks
>>> E> to be shown on the ICA website: submissions are currently open until 24
>>> E> Oct.
>>> E>
>>> E> To complement our existing Live and Media Arts programme, we are looking
>>> E> for work that is innovative, either in technique or ideas. The work we
>>> E> are looking for doesn't necessarily have to be 'interactive', but it
>>> E> must be work that engages with the user.
>>> E>
>>> E> Submissions are open to anyone who wants to show a piece of web-based
>>> E> work that they are proud of or that exemplifies their skills as an
>>> E> artist. It should be a relatively recent or new piece of work that
>>> E> hasn't yet been launched or shown on an institutional or gallery
>>> E> website.
>>> E>
>>> E> More info can be found on
>>> E>
>>> E> http://neme.org/main/700/media-arts-for-the-ica-web-site
>>> E> +
>>> E> -> post: list@rhizome.org
>>> E> -> questions: info@rhizome.org
>>> E> -> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
>>> E> -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
>>> E> +
>>> E> Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
>>> E> Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.php
>>> E>
>>> E
>>> E
>>> E --
>>> E *****************************
>>> E Pall Thayer
>>> E artist
>>> E http://www.this.is/pallit
>>> E *****************************
>>> E +
>>> E -> post: list@rhizome.org
>>> E -> questions: info@rhizome.org
>>> E -> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
>>> E -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
>>> E +
>>> E Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
>>> E Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.php
>>> E
>>>
>>> +
>>> -> post: list@rhizome.org
>>> -> questions: info@rhizome.org
>>> -> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
>>> -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
>>> +
>>> Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
>>> Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.php
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Portfolio: http://davemiller.manme.org.uk
>> Blog: http://davemiller.manme.org.uk/davemiller_art_blog/
>>
>> +
>> -> post: list@rhizome.org
>> -> questions: info@rhizome.org
>> -> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
>> -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
>> +
>> Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
>> Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.php
>>
>
Martin John Callanan
http://greyisgood.eu
http://okay.greyisgood.eu
http://location.greyisgood.eu
Location of I will be part of this year's Velocity Festival
http://velocity.greyisgood.eu
WORDS / WORLDS: Lancaster Institute for Contemporary Practice
Date: 9 May 2013
Time: 1.30-5.30pm
9th May 2013 The Nuffield Theatre, Lancaster University: Centre for Performance and Practice
Convened to mark the appointment of Tim Etchells as Professor of Performance and Practice at LICA, Words / Worlds is an afternoon symposium focused on approaches to writing in an interdisciplinary context. The event takes its title from a two-part neon work All We Have is Words / All We Have is Worlds by Etchells, which quotes and then repeats with modification, a line from Samuel Beckett.
Beginning with a keynote paper/performance from Etchells, which opens questions relating his to text-work in different media, WORDS / WORLDS proceeds with panels and presentations from visual artists Martin John Callanan and Penny McCarthy, from curator Mathieu Copeland, from the novelist Tony White and from the performance maker and scholar Andrew Quick. WORDS / WORLDS celebrates the possibilities of a cross-disciplinary conversation between and about text-based work and writing. A statement by William Burroughs – that the purpose of writing is to make things happen – provides one point of departure for the discussions, which will see each of the participants touch upon key works and ideas from their practise as they think around texts and inter-texts, texts as interventions in, and transformations of, the world, texts as tests or probes of reality, and text as a tool for fragile and temporary world-building.
Free to attend
Organising departments and research centres: Lancaster Institute for the Contemporary Arts
(Im)material Labour, Art Exchange, Colchester

(IM)MATERIAL LABOUR
MONDAY 24 JUNE 2013 – SATURDAY 20 JULY 2013
(Im)material Labour explores our shifting position in an economically functioning society. From the systemisation of post-fordist labour through to the de-materialisation of the service sector, our patterns of working behaviour are constantly being reconfigured.
(Im)material Labour draws together the work of a number of artists who interrogate this phenomenon in light of the current economic climate. Seeking to decode and humanise the financial crisis through analytical ideas and research, the works on display often result in therapeutic and humorous outcomes.
The exhibition includes works by SUPERFLEX, Zachary Formwalt, Ignacio Uriarte, Martin John Callanan, Paul Westcombe and Arnaud Desjardin.
The exhibition will take place both onsite and offsite in a disused office block situated in Colchester Town. Curated by MA Critical Curating students Warren Harper, Matylda Taszycka and alumnus Jonathan Weston.
Curators Tour
Saturday 1 June, 1-2pm
Join the exhibition’s curators for a tour of (Im)material Labour at Art Exchange. To reserve your place, please email immaterial.labour@live.co.uk
Boing Boing: Big pictures of small change
David Pescovitz writes on Boing Boing: Artist Martin John Callanan and the Advanced Engineered Materials Group at the UK’s National Physical Laboratory used an infinite 3D optical microscope to capture 400 million pixel images of the lowest denomination coin from many currencies. “The Fundamental Units”
Business Insider: The World’s Currencies Like You’ve Never Seen Them Before
Max Rosenberg writes:
Some nations have debated getting rid of their smallest monetary denominations.
Even President Obama came out against the penny earlier this year.
Photographer Martin John Callanan is trying to save these coins for future generations, using images.
and Capital Online
Daily Mail: Look after your pennies: microscopic pictures of world’s lowest value coins to save them for future generations
Look after your pennies: Photographer takes microscopic pictures of world’s lowest value coins to save them for future generations
With every battered line, scrape and knock, each coin has been rendered as individual as the many thousands of hands they have passed through.
Now, as governments across the world debate whether to do away with their lowest value coins, one photographer is on a mission to save as many pennies as he can before they are consigned forever to history,
Photographer Martin John Callanan is busy working on a photo project entitled The Fundamental Units – a series of extremely large prints showing the lowest value coins of countries around the world.
He has teamed up with National Physical Laboratory in Teddington, to use ‘Europe’s best microscope’ to show each coin in all its worn charm.
Each coin is photographed with 4,000 individual tiny exposures, and it takes three days of processing to turn the individual photos into a single composite photograph weighing 400 megapixels. Printed out, each photo measures 1.2 and 1.2 meters (~3.9 square feet).
‘In this sense, and in response to the dominance of macroeconomics in the discourse of the media, the artist chooses a microscopic view of the world economy.
‘The Fundamental Units, a series that begins with the works produced by Horrach Moyà Gallery for this exhibition, is an exploration of the lowest denomination coins from the world’s currencies using an infinite focus 3D optical microscope at the National Physical Laboratory in Teddington.’
‘The images obtained with the microscope have been combined to form an extremely detailed large scale reproduction of the least valuable coins from Australia, Chile, the Euro, Myanmar and the Kingdom of Swaziland.
‘In these images the humble metal acquires a planetary dimension and is displayed as the atoms that shape the global economy.’
There are many precedents for scrapping small coins.
In America, the half-cent was abolished in 1857, and in 1984 the UK’s halfpenny was withdrawn.
New Zealand and Australia abandoned the one-cent and two-cent coin in the 1990s.
Campaigners in the US and UK also want the penny and cent coins to be consigned to history, because nothing can be bought with a one-cent or one-penny coin.
see the full article by Amanda Williams
Reposted on Numismatica
Small Change Writ Large: ‘The Fundamental Units’ by Martin John Callanan
Rain Noe at Core77 writes:
What does that look like to you? The cave drawings at Lascaux, maybe?
How about this one? A shield from an ancient civilization?
Nope, these are the lowest of the world’s low-value coins, those forgotten bits of metal that keep lint company in our pockets or fill forgotten jars. Perhaps sensing that cents are on the way out, Martin John Callanan—self-described as “an artist researching an individual’s place within systems”—is photographically preserving them for posterity with his The Fundamental Units project.
The kicker is that a regular camera wouldn’t do, not for what Callanan had in mind; so he teamed up with the UK’s National Physical Laboratory, which is that country’s national measurement standards lab, to use their infinite focus 3D optical microscope. Callanan then captured some 4,000 exposures of each freaking coin, resulting in a series of 400 megapixel images that, blown up and hanging on a gallery wall, reveal details you’d never spot on the real deal. Every nick, scratch, dent, ding and discoloration are laid bare.
So far he’s captured cents, pesos and pence from Australia, Bulgaria, Chile, Croatia, Denmark, Iceland, Latvia, Lituania, Myanmar, Poland, Romania, Swaziland, Sweden, and the United Kingdom, not to mention the Euro; but by the project’s end, Callanan plans to have captured “the lowest denomination coin from each of the world’s 166 active currencies.”
Coins of the World Photographed Using Europe’s Best Microscope
Michael Zhang writes about the Fundamental Units over on Peta Pixel with lots of images.
Did you know that it costs the US Mint 2 cents to produce every 1 cent coin due to the cost of materials and production? Countries such as Canada have already done away with their lowest denomination coins due to their costs and lack of usefulness.
As these “worthless” coins cause debates in their governments about whether or not they should be abolished, photographer Martin John Callanan is on a mission to save them… not as a currency, but rather in photographs.
Article made it to the top of Digg.com
and Complex
and the Baltic News Network
and DB.lv
and Botanwang in China
and CNBCE in Turkey
and Cekin
and Wander Lust Mind
Directory Of Fictitious Telephone Numbers – Impossible Transmissions
An aseptic space. One white table and on it a printed directory, accompanied by an apparently normal looking telephone. It would seem the right environment to make a call. And calls are, in fact, made. The phone operates automatically, dialling random numbers from the many listed in the phone book . The diffused audio allows visitors to listen to the classic dialling sounds, followed by a precise dead tone or a message saying, in varying languages, ‘the number you dialled does not exist’. The process repeats itself tirelessly; another number, another country, another language. A loop of sounds and dead time; a form of a dance, a ritual. A monologue or perhaps a soliloquy. No matter which of the many available numbers are dialled, it is certain that no calls will ever be answered because the list of numbers is officially exposed as The International Directory of Fictitious Telephone Numbers – an extensive list of numbers certified as non-existent and neatly divided into geographic areas of the world. The compilation of this phone book includes official requests from telecommunication regulators in different countries. The artwork, resulting from research by the British artist John Martin Callanan and presented first in Spain and then at the Whitechapel Gallery in London, is indefinitely offered as a resource for use in drama or film productions so that unsuspecting people aren’t disturbed by inquisitive viewers. Art in defence of privacy?
Data as Culture: Open Day 16 March
Your chance to get hold of issue #3 of Text Trends newspaper.
The Open Data Institute (ODI) and MzTEK invite you to the Data as Culture Open Day.
The Data as Culture collection is set in the offices of the ODI, and aims to bring tangible interventions into the
mass accretion of data around us. This is an opportunity to see the artworks in the collection and speak to the curators and some of the artists.
Informal presentations from 2.30pm – 4pm, refreshments provided.
Find out more about the artists and the collection visit: theodi.org/culture/collection
Data as Culture: Open Day
16 March 2013, 12pm – 6pm.
Open Data Institute, 3rd Floor, 65 Clifton Street, London, EC2A 4JE
Along Some Sympathetic Lines, Or Gallery, Berlin




23 February – 27 April 2013
Opening 7pm, 22 February 2013
Or Gallery, Oranienstr 37, Berlin 10999, Germany
Or Gallery is pleased to present Along Some Sympathetic Lines, an exhibition of artwork by London-based artist Martin John Callanan, and an archive project by curator Liz Bruchet. The exhibition considers the poetic possibilities of data and its documentation, and the tenuous process of making meaning.
Martin John Callanan is an artist researching an individual’s place within systems. Callanan generates and reworks photographs, letters and electronic data into evidence of exchanges – between the individual, the institution and the networks of power that intertwine them. The exhibition presents four of the artist’s series: The Fundamental Units, the result of amassing millions of pixels of data, to photographs, in microscopic detail far beyond the capacity of the human eye, the lowest monetary unit of each of the 166 active currencies of world, only to enlarge and print them to vast scale; Wars During My Lifetime, an evolving newspaper listing of every war fought during the course of the artist’s life; Grounds, an ongoing photographic archive which charts ‘important places’ in the world where security restrictions limit the image to the carpeted, tiled or concrete floors; and Letters 2004-2006, Callanan’s correspondence with various heads of states and religious leaders which implicate them in conversations that question their very rationale of their authority. These acts of excavating, accumulating and visualising data draw out the sympathetic aspects within documentation and in so doing, mark and disrupt the underlying power dynamics.
A second gallery features an archive project by London-based curator Liz Bruchet. The display of ephemera from the personal archive of the curator’s grandfather, a Canadian insurance salesman and aspiring radio presenter, takes its inspiration from a found audio recording – part monologue, part autobiography, and part radio show – made in 1974. Harnessing the impulses of the collector, archivist and biographer, the curator reasserts her role as custodian and caretaker to nurture narratives and give weight to the subjective remnants of one man’s life.
This exhibition is curated by Liz Bruchet.
The exhibition is possible with the generous support of Or Gallery, the National Physical Laboratory, and UCL European Institute.
With thanks to Galeria Horrach Moya, (Hiper)vincles, Whitechapel Gallery, Book Works, David Karl, and Pau Waelder.
















