marc garrett
Since the beginning
Works in London United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

PORTFOLIO (7)
BIO
Net artist, media artist, curator, writer, street artist, activist, educationalist and musician. Emerging in the late 80's from the streets exploring creativity via agit-art tactics. Using unofficial, experimental platforms such as the streets, pirate radio such as the locally popular 'Savage Yet Tender' alternative broadcasting 1980's group, net broadcasts, BBS systems, performance, intervention, events, pamphlets, warehouses and gallery spaces. In the early nineties, was co-sysop (systems operator) for a while with Heath Bunting on Cybercafe BBS, dedicated to arts, technology and hacking.

Co-director and co-founder, with artist Ruth Catlow of the net arts collectives and communities- furtherfield.org, furthernoise.org, netbehaviour.org, also cofounder and co-curator/director of the gallery space called HTTP Gallery in London, UK. Currently involved in co-running, collaborating with many others on Node.London. Also co-curating various contemporary Media Arts exhibitions, nationally and Internationally such as Game/play a touring exhibiton.
Discussions (1664) Opportunities (12) Events (175) Jobs (2)
DISCUSSION

Love/sexuality entwined


------=\_NextPart\_001\_0033\_01C2352A.41D7B770
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

BlankLove/sexuality entwined, not entrapment.

For me, love possesses verve, an energy that is like sexuality, a similar s=
pirit; it looms larger than I and larger than culture and opinion. It is pa=
rt of the dream, the planet, my family and my life. Sexuality has brought m=
e here, a place that seems also afraid of it. The irony is tragic, not like=
theatre or film, it is not simulation or abstract as a socially constructe=
d religion, it is more than illusion, it is very real. Sexuality and love c=
annot be measured, not by rules or a microscope. When placed under the lens=
it withers and dies. Yet when one experiences love

DISCUSSION

Re: the struggle continues


I think that it's a hoax anyway....

marc

>
> > From: Eryk Salvaggio <eryk@maine.rr.com>
>
> > Hi Curt,
> >
> > Concerning the Getty case, devils advocate here, isn't it, in a sense,
> > reasonable to assume that
> > you shouldn't be allowed to consume their bandwidth for a project using
> > their image?
> > It seems to me that you are trying to defend its use via context- "sure,
> > I am using the image, but
> > its non-profit, I'm a small website, I'm not competing with you, etc
> > etc", when really, by law, they
> > own the image and if they don't want you using it they have a right to
> > ask you not to use it.
> > Fair use is murky, but this doesn't even seem like a murky issue, you
> > took their image, unaltered,
> > and inserted it wholly into another work, and it seems your defense is
> > that it is okay because you
> > were also taking their bandwidth away from them at the same time?
>
> I think that Eryk makes an intelligent and brave point here. I cant help
but
> agree with him. I always thought the 'I'm small and insignificant and
don't
> make any money out of this work' argument was really lame. As Eryk says,
if
> you just copied the image into your work, i.e. appropriated it, and then
> told them to take a flying fuck, there might be a point. If some nazis
took
> my work and used it in a non profit way I'd still feel that I had the
right
> to control use of my images. At the end of the day, the person who created
> that image is just like you, and artist. And if they gave Getty some
control
> over their image, that control comes with strings, i.e. that Getty protect
> the image. I would expect the same for my work. Cheers, Ivan
>
> + i am not my favorite person
> -> Rhizome.org
> -> post: list@rhizome.org
> -> questions: info@rhizome.org
> -> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
> -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
> +
> Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
> Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.php3
>

DISCUSSION

(1889-1963)


------=_NextPart_001_0006_01C230F8.72C45F90
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Blank"The instinct of nearly all societies is to lock up anybody who is tru=
ly free.
First, society begins by trying to beat you up.
If this fails, they try to poison you. If this fails too, they finish by =
loading honors on your head."
- Jean Cocteau (1889-1963)

------=_NextPart_001_0006_01C230F8.72C45F90
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD><TITLE id=ridTitle>Blank</TITLE>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=windows-125=
2"><BASE
href="file://C:Program FilesCommon FilesMicrosoft SharedStationery">
<STYLE>BODY {
MARGIN-TOP: 25px; FONT-SIZE: 10pt; MARGIN-LEFT: 25px; COLOR: #000000; FONT=
-FAMILY: Arial, Helvetica
}
P.msoNormal {
MARGIN-TOP: 0px; FONT-SIZE: 10pt; MARGIN-LEFT: 0px; COLOR: #ffffcc; FONT-F=
AMILY: Helvetica, "Times New Roman"
}
LI.msoNormal {
MARGIN-TOP: 0px; FONT-SIZE: 10pt; MARGIN-LEFT: 0px; COLOR: #ffffcc; FONT-F=
AMILY: Helvetica, "Times New Roman"
}
</STYLE>

<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2716.2200" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY id=ridBody bgColor=#ffffff
background=cid:000401c230f0$10fb1590$0100a8c0@FURTHERFIELD>
<DIV>
<DL>
<DIV align=center>
<CENTER>
<DT>"The instinct of nearly all societies is to lock up anybody who is tr=
uly
free. </DT>
<DT>First, society begins by trying to beat you up. <BR>If this fails, th=
ey
try to poison you. If this fails too, they finish by loading honors on yo=
ur
head." </CENTER></DT></DIV></DL><FONT size=2>
<P align=center>- Jean Cocteau (1889-1963)</FONT></P></DIV>
<P>&nbsp;</P></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_001_0006_01C230F8.72C45F90--

DISCUSSION

life sentences for hackers


------=_NextPart_001_0014_01C23001.26D21D40
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

BlankHouse OKs life sentences for hackers

But time may run out for computer crime bill in Senate

WASHINGTON, July 15

DISCUSSION

Re: getty.JPG


It wouild be great to see various visceral iamges other than poo - for inst=
ance - tears. One could write tears. Declaring one's fluidity 'literally'.

marc

In a message dated 7/17/2002 10:31:17 PM Central Daylight Time, Nmherman@=
aol.com writes:

is that really your own poo?

Actually it's a very legitimate question Marc. seriously, I think. Art-=
wise.

The poop is timed and dated just prior to the jpg, and is mostly a meal o=
f eggs. Therefore the poop was very smooth and like all egg tempera, dried=
cleanly and quickly.

Notice there are virtually no smudges on the scanner. Only a tiny portio=
n of shit was left to be cleaned up.

The original calligraphic masterpiece is now safely drying in an open man=
ila folder and emits little or no smell. I am considering whether to use s=
ome kind of fixative on the high-quality heavy-duty paper.

Oddly, I had assumed I'd be throwing a dirty stinky mess out of the house=
but shit tempera, hey it works man--maybe.

I also have the cleaned and sterilized brush I used, it was NOT done with=
a finger! I'll rhetoricate anyone who says different of denies the eviden=
ce.

Because shit stinks.

Max Herman,

The Genius 2000 Network

++