Welcome, Guest Log In Join forgot password?
kanarinka akanarinak
Since the beginning
kanarinka@ikatun.com
Works in Waltham, Massachusetts United States of America

PORTFOLIO (2)
BIO
kanarinka, a.k.a. Catherine D’Ignazio, is an artist and educator. Her artwork is participatory and distributed – a single project might take place online, in the street and in a gallery, and involve multiple audiences participating in different ways for different reasons. Her practice is collaborative even when she says it’s not. Her artwork has been exhibited at the ICA Boston, Eyebeam, MASSMoCA, and the Western Front among other locations.

www.kanarinka.com
Discussions (67) Opportunities (7) Events (11) Jobs (0)
DISCUSSION

architects go broadband


whether you love or hate flash you will appreciate this ;)

http://www.spacehijackers.co.uk/architects/index.html

------------------------------

Dear Space Hijackers, Can I say first of all that I have been an admirer
of your work for many years now, and it is because of my boundless love
for your architectural work that I am proud to be in the position that I
am now in. I am writing to commission you to build five of the largest
and most extravagant buildings yet known to mankind. There will be
unlimited funds, and we are going to bulldoze a large part of central
London to make way for whatever you decide you would like to make.
Please get in contact so that we can arrange a meeting to discuss the
project further.

DISCUSSION

interview with Giselle Bieguelman


Interview with Giselle Bieguelman
by kanarinka

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
background

from Bieguelman's website www.desvirtual.com:
Giselle Beiguelman is a new media artist and multimedia essayist who teaches Digital Culture at the Graduation Program in Communication and Semiotics of PUC-SP (Sao Paulo, Brazil). Her work includes the award-winning "The Book after the Book" (1999) "Content = No Cache" (2000), nominated for the Trace/ Alt-X New Media Competition, and "Recycled" (2001).

kanarinka: I became interested in Giselle Bieguelman's work after reading about her project poetrica [http://www.poetrica.net/] in which people from around the world send messages via the web, SMS, and WAP to be displayed on large advertising billboards in Sao Paulo. My questions to Bieguelman center around the fascinating way her projects break down fixed notions of space (such as public private real virtual) and her projects' connections to everyday activities like reading, writing, and travelling through your daily environment (which for many of us is urban and saturated with advertising messages).

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
interview

kanarinka: It looks like you began working with the internet first as a poet and that you have recently moved into creating large-scale public installations where people submit text messages via the internet for
display in public places. Could you describe how/why you shifted from
net.based poetry to net. based public installation?

Bieguelman: I don

DISCUSSION

Call to Artists and other Regular People


[apologies for cross postings]

hello rhizome,

Please contribute to my new project: "public alley 818, Boston, MA, USA"
- http://www.ikatun.com/k/publicalley818/

"public alley 818" is an urban intervention (It intervenes right into an
alley near my house). Recently I have begun exploring questions of
potentiality, play and public space through the creation of
Fluxus/Ono-like scores. In this project, I would like you to contribute
the instruction pieces and I will carry (some of) them out in public
alley 818 in Boston.

I would like to invite you all to take a moment to dream up an
instruction piece for public alley 818 in Boston, MA, USA.

Here's how it works:

1) You submit an instruction piece here:
http://www.ikatun.com/k/publicalley818/submit.php

2) All instruction pieces are published in the Gallery of Instructions
here: http://www.ikatun.com/k/publicalley818/submitted.php

3) Then I choose which pieces to enact (and how many different versions
to enact) and those go in the Gallery of Enactments:
http://www.ikatun.com/k/publicalley818/gallery.php

Thanks in advance for your participation/collaboration!

best wishes,
kanarinka

ps: please report any bugs to me!

DISCUSSION

Re: Re: Re: Fwd: <nettime> ars lecture on software / art /


I'm saying that there is no such duty -- it was primarily in reaction to
the comment that Software Art "has to address the specifics of software"
-- I find that to be a very limiting, modernist, formalist approach to
creating art in any medium. As far as thematic "shoulds" I don't think
there is any such thing for any medium. I am more interested in seeing
software art engage with the world outside of software to see what it
can bring to bear in that sphere.

best,
kanarinka

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-list@rhizome.org [mailto:owner-list@rhizome.org] On Behalf
Of metaphorz
Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 1:09 PM
To: list@rhizome.org
Subject: RHIZOME_RAW: Re: Re: Fwd: <nettime> ars lecture on software /
art /

Kanarinka wrote:

>
> "The gist of my argument today is that the cultural topology of this
> software 'environment' is articulated by art projects. I'm not saying
> that all art with digital media has to address the specifics of
> software, but I think that Software Art should."
>
> I beg to differ with this for a different reason - namely, the idea
> that the *duty* of art (in whatever genre - painting, video, software,
> etc.)
> is to address the (social/cultural/political/economic) context in
> which
> it is created.

I need to make sure I am understanding your point. Are you saying that
you think that there is a specific anti-formalist duty of art, or are
you rejecting this stated "duty" ? Of course, there is no such duty.

-pf

+ ti esrever dna ti pilf nwod gniht ym tup
-> post: list@rhizome.org
-> questions: info@rhizome.org
-> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
-> give: http://rhizome.org/support
+
Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.php

DISCUSSION

Re: Fwd: <nettime> ars lecture on software / art /


The gist of my argument today is that the cultural topology of this
software 'environment' is articulated by art projects. I'm not saying
that all art with digital media has to address the specifics of
software, but I think that Software Art should."

I beg to differ with this for a different reason - namely, the idea that
the *duty* of art (in whatever genre - painting, video, software, etc.)
is to address the (social/cultural/political/economic) context in which
it is created.

This is an important area for art in any medium to address - one could
say that the whole modernist project was about addressing, questioning
and criticizing these questions. Software art, being a little newer than
painting and much less accessible to those that do not code, has a
critical responsibility to this end. However, to limit software art to
discussing the context of software only is very narrow given that there
is a world outside of the production and distribution of software.
(Should painting only address the specifics of painting or photography
only those of photography? This leads to speaking to specialists about
specialist history of specialist genres).

In my opinion it is much more interesting to investigate how software
can intersect with other genres, with physical space, with ways to
provoke (general) audiences to participation/engagement, with themes
that might not be related to geek/nerd/open-source/etc. communities (not
to dis on these here - i'm a coder that aspires towards geekdom - only
that it seems to me that there is a fetishization of the "geek" in the
software art world -- e.g. whoever's got the baddest skillset wins ). I
think it is reasonable and entirely necessary to ask software art to
open up its area of criticality and engage not only with the context of
software but with the world at large - the software and tools are ready,
the humans need to catch up.

best,
kanarinka

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-list@rhizome.org [mailto:owner-list@rhizome.org] On Behalf
Of Jim Andrews
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 6:46 AM
To: list@rhizome.org
Subject: Re: RHIZOME_RAW: Fwd: <nettime> ars lecture on software / art /

"The gist of my argument today is that the cultural topology of this
software 'environment' is articulated by art projects. I'm not saying
that all art with digital media has to address the specifics of
software, but I think that Software Art should."

There isn't much software art that can begin to compare with Napster in
articulating the cultural topology of the software environment. Napster
went beyond articulating it to shaping it. This is a possibility for
software art that is rarely considered: that software art can not solely
articulate but shape culture and its software.

The most original programmers in the world define software art by their
creations.

Part of the excitement of software art is that a lot of it happens
outside the art world; software art cannot easily be contained therein,
precisely because it is a practice relevant much more widely than to
matters of art. The art of programming comprehends Knuth's approach but
also involves the engineering of experience. And, as you say, awareness
of the social context.

You say

"I believe that we need a strong notion of what constitutes art, and we
must argue about that, but it would help immensely if we could agree on
drawing a bottom line which excludes some attempts. For me, and again I
put this up for discussion, art is about the transgression of
boundaries, about making familiar experiences strange, about dramatising
what pretends to be innocent, and about exploring the virtualities, the
potentialities of technologies and human relationships."

The stronger the notion of what constitutes art, the more it will miss.
It is, I suppose, the job of critics to define it and artists to
confound their definitions via works that escape categorization and open
into fresh experience/perception/realization of what art can be.

ja
http://vispo.com

+ ti esrever dna ti pilf nwod gniht ym tup
-> post: list@rhizome.org
-> questions: info@rhizome.org
-> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
-> give: http://rhizome.org/support
+
Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.php


RSS FEED

Erase the Border [Planned, Spring 2012]


Donate


“Erase the Border” is a project that will take place on the Tohono O’odham Indian Reservation in southern Arizona.

The Institute for Infinitely Small Things is currently seeking funding to complete the project in Spring 2012 (see detailed request below).

The project would be to physically “erase” the U.S.-Mexico border fence on the Tohono O’odham Nation in southern Arizona. The fence divides the Tohono O’odham community, disrupts ceremonial paths, desecrates sacred burial grounds and prevents members from receiving critical health services.

Ofelia Rivas and youth from the Tohono O’odham Nation will work with the Institute for Infinitely Small Things to create a series of drawings from performances on the U.S.-Mexican border in southern Arizona.

What we will do

We will walk the border fence in a ceremonial way.

We will drag and press large 30″ x 40″ sheets of fine art paper along the fence as we go.

The walking and pressure will create drawings that pick up physical matter – dirt, debris, bugs, rust – and remove it from the border fence.

A small part of the border fence will be removed forever.

The created drawings are abstract landscapes.

About the Tohono O’odham

The Tohono O’odham are an indigenous tribe that live on the second largest indian reservation in the U.S. Their lands straddle 75 miles of the U.S.-Mexico border in southern AZ. The O’odham lived on the land long before the US or Mexico or the Gadsden Purchase or Homeland Security.

The vehicle border fence, erected in 2008 by Homeland Security, stretches for 75 miles across the O’odham lands in the deserts of Arizona.

More Information

Please watch the below video for a full background on the Tohono O’odham’s situation on the border.

Seeking Funding

Originally slated to be performed in Fall 2011, this project continues to seek funding to be completed in Spring 2012. See below for more info.

Any contribution is welcome; our total need is $2,400, which would cover the following:

  • Travel for 2 members of Institute for Infinitely Small Things from Boston to AZ
  • Fine art paper
  • Transportation for Ofelia Rives, O’odham youth and Institute members (distances on the reservation are great and gas is expensive)
  • Honorarium for youth participants
  • One day of meals for everyone involved
  • Still photography, video documentation and post-production

Donate



The Border Crossed Us


The Border Crossed Us is a temporary public art installation by the Institute for Infinitely Small Things that transplants the US-Mexico border fence in southern Arizona to the UMass Amherst campus.

The Border Crossed Us Book is now available for order. See below for details.

What happens when we divide a territory that the community imagines as contiguous? How does the international border in Arizona, seemingly remote from a college campus in northern New England, touch all of our lives?

From April 20 to May 1st, the UMass Amherst campus was divided along its North-South boundary by a to-scale photographic replica of the vehicle fence that runs along the international boundary in southern Arizona. The particular stretch of fence being represented was erected in 2007 by Homeland Security and now divides the Tohono O’odham Nation – the second largest Native American reservation in the country – into two parts.

The fence will ran between a parking garage and the campus center. Over the course of two weeks it served as a provocation, a touchstone for conversation, and a site for talks and performances. Along with the fence’s insertion into daily life on campus, the project invited a delegation of Tohono O’odham, including a tribal elder and several youth to speak about their experience. In addition, the Native American Studies Certificate Program in the Anthropology Department held a panel discussion on Borders & Indigenous Sovereignty as part of the campus’ annual Native American Powwow. Border issues affect several other tribes, including the Mohawk and Abenaki. The delegation of O’odham spoke along with others about these issues during the conference and participate in the powwow.

This project was commissioned by the University Museum of Contemporary Art at UMass Amherst.

The following time-lapse video of the installation was produced using a motion-detecting camera designed for hunting purposes. Sounds are from the accompanying sound installation, which was installed inside the large, circular parking garage vent in the foreground:

The Border Crossed Us Book

This 42-page, full-color book uses maps, essays, photographs, and a variety of other rich graphics to communicate the background and results of The Border Crossed Us.

Order here.

More info, images and dialogue on the project website:

www.thebordercrossed.us


No One Has Yet Determined What The Body Can Do


On Sunday, October 1 2011 the Institute joined with Occupy Boston in the 6th HONK! Parade to carry signs with two messages: “NO ONE HAS YET DETERMINED WHAT THE BODY CAN DO” and “#OCCUPYBOSTON”.

At 7AM Thursday, October 6 2011 the Institute strung banners over a Boston highway with the same messages. This was done as part of the multi-city Afghanistan War Tenth Anniversary Banners project.


Transgender Bathroom Dedication


Transgender Bathroom Dedication dedicates the men’s room at the MFA Boston to Dean Spade who was arrested in 2002 for using the men’s room in Grand Central Station and dedicates the women’s room at the MFA Boston to Chrissy Pollis who was the victim of a transgender hate crime in a Maryland bathroom in May 2011.

These two new works are gifts to the MFA Boston on behalf of the Institute for Infinitely Small Things. They were emplaced as part of “Boston’s Best 40-ennial”, a 19-minute historical and totally unauthorized exhibition in the bathroom of the MFA Boston organized by Greg Cook on June 20th, 2011.

More information about the exhibition:


Failure Support Group


Is there, actually, a recipe for failure? Are certain methodologies more prone to failure than others? How? What is at stake in acknowledging failure in one’s process, one’s community, or one’s career?

Failure Support Group from Infinitely Small on Vimeo.

In April 2011, The Institute for Infinitely Small Things sent out an open invitation to discuss failed processes and failed projects. Consisting of 5-7 minute presentations by the Institute and invited participants, the event addressed the ways in which failures can and cannot be currently discussed in the world–and how we may be able to imagine to new ways to perceive, view and characterize what “failure” is.

This was the second part in a series started by Platform2.


The World’s Largest Potluck Ever


The World’s Largest Potluck Ever would stage a mile-long potluck dinner on the Cambridge Street Corridor in Cambridge, MA, in an attempt to break the Guinness record, showcase the diversity of the businesses and residents, build community, publish a recipe book and display a dazzling array of home-cooked meals. For one Sunday afternoon, the whole street would be transformed into a giant neighborhood block party with food, performers and fun.



The World’s Largest Potluck Ever was inspired by Cambridge Street’s history as a commercial corridor of independently-run businesses and as a meeting place for people from diverse regions. Cambridge Street has seen significant waves of immigrants from Ireland, Poland, Italy, Portugal and Brazil. While the street has numerous festivals and special events (such as the 84-year-old annual Feast of Saints Cosmas and Damian or the Inman Square summer movie nights) there is no special event that celebrates the corridor specifically.

The World’s Largest Potluck Ever was part of a competition for the Cambridge Street Public Art Commission in Cambridge, MA, in 2010. It was on display in the city’s art gallery in Spring 2010 and three local residents were commissioned to create homemade dishes for gallery visitors to taste. Unfortunately the project was not selected for the commission but this idea is still worth doing! (Who does not want to attend the world’s largest potluck ever??) Contact me if you are interested in reviewing the full proposal.


Art & Cartography


An article for the International Encyclopedia of Human Geography, published by Elsevier Press. Download article.

Synopsis:

Art has taken a distinct “cartographic turn” in the last century. This period represents a veritable explosion of artwork that takes on cartography in order to critique, subvert, and reimagine territory. Artists have made maps, subverted maps, performed itineraries, imagined territories, contested borders, charted the invisible, and hacked physical, virtual, and hybrid spaces. There are three loose groupings of important mapping impulses that have characterized the artistic appropriation of cartographic strategies, both literally and metaphorically, from the early twentieth century to present times: 1) Symbol Saboteurs: artists who use the visual iconography of the map to reference personal, fictional, utopian, or metaphorical places; 2) Agents and Actors: artists who make maps or engage in situated, locational activities in order to challenge the status quo or change the world; and 3) Invisible Data-Mappers: artists who use cartographic metaphors to visualize informational territories such as the stock market, the Internet, or the human genome. This article outlines and contextualizes these three impulses with numerous examples.


It takes 154,000 breaths to evacuate Boston


kanarinka ran the entire evacuation route system in Boston and attempted to measure the distance in human breath. The project also involves a podcast and a sculptural installation of the archive of tens of thousands of breaths .

The project is an attempt to measure our post-9/11 collective fear in the individual breaths that it takes to traverse these new geographies of insecurity.

The $827,500 Boston emergency evacuation system was installed in 2006 to demonstrate the city’s preparedness for evacuating people in snowstorms, hurricanes, infrastructure failures, fires and/or terrorist attacks.

It takes 154,000 breaths to evacuate Boston consists of:

  1. a series of running performances in public space (2007)
  2. a web podcast of breaths (2007)
  3. a sculptural installation of the archive of breaths (2008)

Running Performances

Website & Podcast

Evacuateboston.com website
Project Website: www.evacuateboston.com

Archive of Breaths (sculptural piece)

Medium: custom-made table, 26 jars, 26 speaker components, wire, 13 CD players
Dimensions: 45″x72″x16″

I created a sculptural & audio archive of the collection of breaths. There are 26 jars on a custom-made table which correspond to the 26 runs it took to cover the evacuation routes. Each jar size corresponds to the number of breaths from that run. The speaker inside the jar plays the breaths collected from that run. (Better documentation coming soon)

This piece is on view in Experimental Geography, a traveling show curated by Nato Thompson and produced by ICI.


Exit Strategy


It takes 154,000 breaths to evacuate Boston was installed at the Institute of Contemporary Art Boston in 2009 as part of the James & Audrey Foster Prize show along with a new work entitled Exit Strategy.

Excerpt from Exit Strategy:

Exit Strategy. Video installation loop 2’15”. 2008.


Digging for Happiness


The Institute for Infinitely Small Things sought happiness through the labor of digging an enormous hole in the front yard of a Cambridge family who volunteered their land for this purposelessness.