D42 Kandinskij
Since the beginning
Works in Cjii Ibatzu United States of America

Discussions (1361) Opportunities (0) Events (0) Jobs (0)

Re: Re: further question on the "rublinda" correspondance

On Thu, 10 Apr 2003 12:41:06 -0400, "curt cloninger" <curt@lab404.com>

> still, i think it raises some important issues.

du think

+ continue to think that you think

+ lies, lies, lies

however, you're not thinking

tra le la

who holds your hand when you type

likely a fly

voila: 21c humanity

ridden by dustbunnies + vermin
-IID42 Kandinskij @27+

http://www.fastmail.fm - mmm... fastmail


Re: Ethics and Art

On Tue, 8 Apr 2003 01:16:20 -0400, "Eryk Salvaggio" <eryk@maine.rr.com>

"Artists" will never be responsible as responsibility requires that one
gives up "opinionating" about things one does not know, while most
art is based in loud-screaming of one's opinions in this or that medium

+ the one thing "artists" will never admit is that they are..
+ know..

quite rather the opposite they shall insist + insist towards the building
of the false persona.

It's easy to bomb WTC. Bombing "artist" identities--c'est difficile.
These days--more bloated than anyone else's.

Recognition of their *significant* contributions to war they shall never
deem to acknowledge + where there is no remorse, there is no forgiveness.

Parasitising one of the last available venues for humanity:
c'est ca votre "revoluticion".

-IID42 Kandinskij @27+

http://www.fastmail.fm - Choose from over 50 domains or use your own


Re: Kanarinka@CoSo - Boston

On Tue, 8 Apr 2003 11:59:43 -0400, "Kanarinka" <kanarinka@ikatun.com>
> Brethren and Sistren,

We are not your "brethren & sistren".
Do avoid "lumping us".

> Please consider yourselves most cordially invited to the Copley Society's
> exhibit: "Manifest 2003: A Juried Exhibition of Visual Art in Digital
> Media".

Very cordially. Shame you're lying out of a manner of politeness.

> The opening reception is in Boston this Thursday, April 10th from 5:30 -
> 7:30PM. Details are in the message below.

That's good, but will you tell us why you "sell" third rate
of something others did 40+ years ago as your own art without pointing
the original sources of the technology involved?

No, we don't suppose.

> Best wishes to all,

Do you enjoy turning the other cheek?
-IID42 Kandinskij @27+

http://www.fastmail.fm - And now for something completely different


Re: further question on the "rublinda" correspondance

Or is everybodi fit to be an artist?

When the very adorable fluxus artists
complimented the audience as their artwork
+ offered them liberation from the
institutionalized prisons of museums
which are constructs of their delusions

the very unadorable audience respondi:

"we should build our own 'world'"

thusly demonstrating their inner lack
+ ability to accept compliment
+ status of absolutely undesirable
+ flippantly + idolatrously destroying
their "fathers"

+ demanding a double-secure imprisonment
both in their own perversion + that of museum

01 spartacus spoke: je suis ici to liberate vous
from the imprisonment of
the museum-stone grave of
blind physical manifestation

the ignorant audiensz responded: nei! we are going to change
the unchangeable
destroy + revolt

+hensz spartacus was killed

01 jesus spoke: have come to liberate toi

+ the ignorant audiensz perverted his words into religion

+hensz jesus was crucified

"freedom is impoooooooooooooossible"

bleat the ignorant + masochistic masses screaming

(breaking the laws is ultra "fashionable"
since 6576 AD)

+ bashing down those who try to act apropos
the laws of consciousness

the "responsibility" of the artist is to face itself
in all its cowardice + filth + its contribution to
world misery

only then + then, when he truly sees + faces himself
as he is_ can he begin la creacion of that which is
capable of genuine good
-IID42 Kandinskij @27+

http://www.fastmail.fm - The professional email service


Re: Re: Re: Dia article in NYTimes Mag

It's very simple: quality is not a constant of quantity. That is:
quality's source is irrelevant to physical manifestations. Your
"arguments" are all steeped in "material brain calculations". As
such ++full of cliches. fallacious + programmatic connections.
.assumptions .erroneous nonsense .idolatry of words.

On Tue, 8 Apr 2003 18:21:45 +0000, "joseph (yes=no & yes<>no) "
<joseph@electrichands.com> said:

> > I don't think that the open source model of software engineering is going to
> > work for artwork.One doesn't have this sort of certainty when it comes to
> > making art and who wants to freely follow a tyrant that wants everyone to toe
> > the line re: subject and content of an artwork.

Subject + content of the artwork as "appropriate" cannot be perceived
everyone, and not by beginners. "Your" idea of a "tyrant" is anyone who
doesn't let you knee-jerk in whatever fashion you're accustomed to.

"Do as you please. You are an individual. Born that way".

-IID42 Kandinskij @27+

http://www.fastmail.fm - Email service worth paying for. Try it for free