artfagcity
Since 2005
Works in Brooklyn, New York United States of America

Discussions (14) Opportunities (0) Events (1) Jobs (0)
DISCUSSION

The Rematerialization of Art


From my blog:

image
Cory Arcangel. Image via: Holy Fire

Ed Halter’s brief discussion of Holy Fire, Art of the Digital Age, an exhibition exploring New Media’s entrance into the art market has generated 67 comments to date on the Rhizome blog, undoubtedly the longest and most invested I’ve read to date on the site. To provide a bit of background, Holy Fire’s website divides the concepts of this show up into three parts:

* Art of Our Time (let’s stop labeling ourselves as New Media artists because the medium is familiar to everyone now)

* Collectible Artworks (Holy Fire may be the first exhibition to show only collectible new media artworks already on the art market!)

* New Economy for Autonomy, (The art market can give us freedom, and this show may be the first to help build the “new economy”!)

Clearly the conceit behind the exhibition has a few problems, even if its artist list, which includes Cory Arcangel, JODI, Olia Lialina and Dragon Espenchied, Paul Slocum, Eddo Stern and Carlo Zanni, to name just a few, suggest there will be a lot of great work. The curators themselves admit as much on the thread, Domenico Quarantax’s first response to Tom Moody’s description of the artworks-already-sold conceit as boring, being “You are right, this is a boring concept.” Naturally he goes on to defend the show, and as a curator that’s to be expected.

The discussion thread is too long to address piece by piece, but it is worth observing the reluctance of many commenters to speak substantively to the show theme of art as purchased commodity, which ultimately resulted in Moody’s visible frustration and in turn, needless hostility towards the artist, presumably for trying to push the issue. Frankly, I’m not sure why granting this point should be so difficult, after all the Joseph DeLappe comment in the thread, “Consider how uninterested we would be in a show about “paintings that sell!””, was proved this Fall with the Met’s hugely unpopular “Age of Rembrandt”. An exhibition organized by which philanthropist bought what, the Negative reviews poured in, not just for its visibly inflated institutional ego and a childish desire to awe people, but for an approach that undermines the art-historical content needed to create a successful exhibition.

In this case, a similar concern exists, because the theme of the show privileges the new materiality of an object over its content and does not provide sufficient historical background (granted, more material may become available at the exhibition, but the website is insufficient.) Perhaps the most promising aspect of the show for this reason lies in the discussion panel, because it gives the participating artists a chance to articulate this history and jump outside a set of curatorial concerns they may not share. On this thread alone, Patrick Lichty, the panel moderator has fleshed out some of this timeline and Olia Lialina, a participating artist and panelist, articulated her opposition to the integration of New Media to contemporary art, saying, “I think that position, spoken by Regine Debaty — forget media, drop new, enjoy art — is sort of reactionary. I don’t enjoy art, I enjoy some of the new media, especially WWW and I find media specificity to be the most exiting thing.”

My own reasons for opposing the erasure of New Media as a label take a slightly different approach only in that unlike Lialina, I support contextualizing New Media within the larger fine art world (I like both). However, I similarly couldn’t be less interested in a conversation that suggests giving up a means of identifying a practice significantly different than traditional mediums, while using the increased saleability of the object as the primary support for that argument. As a sales tool, it may be of some help to gallerists, but as a larger practice it does nothing to move the field forward, because it glosses over the specific skills of the artist. What’s more, the idea that sales should some how become evidence of New Media’s acceptance into the larger fine art world is erroneous. Sure, there’s been progress, some of which has been seen in the market, but it doesn’t negate the fact that when I’ve spoken to journalists this year on the subject of New Media, most begin by asking me (off the record) why well known Fine Art critics don’t know enough to even accept a cursory interview. The fact that critics are paid to know about art and yet have only negligible knowledge of the discipline, is the most basic indicator that New Media is a still peripheral practice within the art world. And Holy Fire won’t change this. Given its location, it may introduce a few attendees of the Art Brussels international contemporary art fair to New Media, but nothing more.

DISCUSSION

Brush-off


Yea, I probably could have been more specific with the unicorn landscapes, hackerism, and one trick pony art boing boing posts as "art pablum". Proops bothers me because his painting actually seems to be going from awful to even more awful. "Painting Downloading: Please wait, is pretty facile, but "humorously" censoring the genitals of a classical painting, or whatever else he's interested in as a means of social commentary, is utterly infantile.

DISCUSSION


PS By screens, I meant projection pieces.

DISCUSSION

Out of Office AutoReply


Certainly there are examples of multiple takes on projects where the development is meaningful, but it seems to me the rate at which Apple turns out new computers was implicit in using the older computers. The screens to me seem the most successful iteration of that project because it helps to minimize the conversation about the sale of the computer and the art, which is undoubtedly the least engaging aspect of the work.

EVENT

ROFL! A Gong Show for Artists and Internet Nerds


Dates:
Fri Jun 22, 2007 00:00 - Thu Jun 21, 2007

Don't miss ROFL!, the Internet competition Art Fag City has been working on with John Seroff of Tofu Hut at Joe's Pub, Friday June 22nd at 11:30 pm. Briefly, the event is basically an internet gong show pitting the finds and creations of cewebrity contestants such as Andrew Baron of Rocketboom, and Josh Fruhlinger of Wonkette against each other. I've pasted the less brief, (but super fun) press release below.

********

Competitors are:

Featuring web art, presentations and
"teh funney" from

Josh Fruhlinger of Comics Curmudgeon and Wonkette

Cintra Wilson of Salon and Dregublog

Michelle Collins of You Can't Make It Up and
VH1's Best Week Ever

Andrew Baron, co-creator and producer of Rocketboom

Tony Carnevale of Channel 102

Marisa Olson, Marisa Olson/ Nasty Nets member/ editor / curator of Rhizome.org

Stu VanAirsdale of The Reeler

Charles Broskoski of Supercentral

ROFL is the very best of the internet, lovingly hand-picked by eight of AmericaaE