BIO
Annie Abrahams has a doctorate in biology from the university of Utrecht and a grade from the Academy of fine arts of Arnhem. In her work, using video, performance as well as the internet, she questions the possibilities and the limits of communication in general and more specifically investigates its modes under networked conditions. She is an internationally regarded pioneer of networked performance art.
She has performed and shown work extensively in France, including at the Pompidou Centre, Paris, and in many international galleries including among others Espai d’Art Contemporani de Castelló, Spain; the Museum of Contemporary Art, Tokyo; the Armenian Center for Contemporary Experimental Art, Yerevan; HTTP gallery in London and NIMk in Amsterdam; festivals such as the Moscow Film Festival; the International Film Festival of Rotterdam and the Stuttgarter Filmwinter, and on online platforms such as Rhizome.org and Turbulence.
She teached at the university of Montpellier in the arts department. (2002-2005) From november 2006 to january 2009 she curated the project “InstantS” for panoplie.org. She also curated and organized the “Breaking Solitude” and Double Bind webperformances on panoplie.org in 2007, 2008 and 2009.
Besides doing her art work she lectures and teaches workshops.
Information, articles etc. http://www.bram.org/info and http://aabrahams.wordpress.com/
She has performed and shown work extensively in France, including at the Pompidou Centre, Paris, and in many international galleries including among others Espai d’Art Contemporani de Castelló, Spain; the Museum of Contemporary Art, Tokyo; the Armenian Center for Contemporary Experimental Art, Yerevan; HTTP gallery in London and NIMk in Amsterdam; festivals such as the Moscow Film Festival; the International Film Festival of Rotterdam and the Stuttgarter Filmwinter, and on online platforms such as Rhizome.org and Turbulence.
She teached at the university of Montpellier in the arts department. (2002-2005) From november 2006 to january 2009 she curated the project “InstantS” for panoplie.org. She also curated and organized the “Breaking Solitude” and Double Bind webperformances on panoplie.org in 2007, 2008 and 2009.
Besides doing her art work she lectures and teaches workshops.
Information, articles etc. http://www.bram.org/info and http://aabrahams.wordpress.com/
Webflaneur 4.0
Webflaneur 4.0
http://webflaneur.net
Annie Abrahams & Clement Charmet
A kind of compressed browsing, like sometimes those dreams, that condense
the weight of a whole day in a single action, in which everything gets
mixed.
This feeling of "watching the cache" of our browser (the hidden ?)
A discovery tool that brings us back to the earlier ages of the web, when
"flaner" was still possible.
If your stroll is very slow, please try another URL or come back at another
moment of the day or find a faster connection.
http://webflaneur.net
Annie Abrahams & Clement Charmet
A kind of compressed browsing, like sometimes those dreams, that condense
the weight of a whole day in a single action, in which everything gets
mixed.
This feeling of "watching the cache" of our browser (the hidden ?)
A discovery tool that brings us back to the earlier ages of the web, when
"flaner" was still possible.
If your stroll is very slow, please try another URL or come back at another
moment of the day or find a faster connection.
Re: Charlie puts NMA's down...
Art is a closed system that only sees what it already knows. (And is
very badly equipped to access new information)
I think we have to defend new media art
we will have to be missionaries
we will have to educate
we will have to infiltrate
we will have to explain
we will have to promote early netart
And at the same time we should go on to intertwine different spheres,
to develop new ways of seeing the same, never seen before, to
experiment beyond techniques, to develop new ways of generating sense.
Don't forget we (at least some of us) are on the internet because we
don't want to have "art" as our only customer, consumer nor as the
most important vector by which we work.
Yet, we want recognition from the art world because that's the place
we feel at home (at least some of us)
Restart reading at the beginning.
Annie Abrahams
PS 1
What's wrong with watercolours? I would be delighted if as many people
wanted to learn coding as watercolours. One can make cutting edge art
in watercolours, but it's rare.
Art is rare. So the article does not disappoint me. It talks about new
media. We exist!
PS 2
Please ARN explain us a bit more about your poietic aggregator?
Indeed, how many persons are behind?
Tell me why this is more than just another way to produce beautiful
abstract images?
I would like to have them too :)
- Hide quoted text -
On 8/18/06, ARN <info@x-arn.org> wrote:
> another quote:
> "The web, Charlie says, has the alarming potential of realising the idea of
> the artist Joseph Beuys, that everyone is an artist. This could spell the
> end of art as we know it, when everyone becomes a producer and we all drown
> in a sea of mediocrity made up of billions of minutely-niched microchannels."
>
> i think this is great, so will better write:
>
> "when everyone becomes a producer and we all grow in a great sea of
> experimentations made up of billions of creative microchannels."
>
> why being so alarmed by JB (& others) idea , Charlie ?
>
>
>
>
>
> marc wrote:
> > Wow - and now we have Charlie Gere putting us all down.
> >
> > "So are artists at the cutting edge of new-media technology? No, says
> > Charlie. One of the problems is that other stuff on the net is so much
> > more mind-blowing. A site such as Google Earth is so much more awesome
> > and thought-provoking than something an arty hacktivist can knock up on
> > her PC."
> >
> > I would love to have an open discussion with him about this stuff this
> > on-line.
> >
> > http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/mtaa/~3/13468813/the_times_uk_does_new_media.html
> >
> >
> > Also check rhizome front page...
> >
> > Thanks Charlie, we love you two ;-)
> >
> > marc
> >
>
> +
> -> post: list@rhizome.org
> -> questions: info@rhizome.org
> -> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
> -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
> +
> Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
> Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.php
>
--
"Bitter times, I wish I could reassure you."
.news series.
http://www.bram.org/press/rassur
very badly equipped to access new information)
I think we have to defend new media art
we will have to be missionaries
we will have to educate
we will have to infiltrate
we will have to explain
we will have to promote early netart
And at the same time we should go on to intertwine different spheres,
to develop new ways of seeing the same, never seen before, to
experiment beyond techniques, to develop new ways of generating sense.
Don't forget we (at least some of us) are on the internet because we
don't want to have "art" as our only customer, consumer nor as the
most important vector by which we work.
Yet, we want recognition from the art world because that's the place
we feel at home (at least some of us)
Restart reading at the beginning.
Annie Abrahams
PS 1
What's wrong with watercolours? I would be delighted if as many people
wanted to learn coding as watercolours. One can make cutting edge art
in watercolours, but it's rare.
Art is rare. So the article does not disappoint me. It talks about new
media. We exist!
PS 2
Please ARN explain us a bit more about your poietic aggregator?
Indeed, how many persons are behind?
Tell me why this is more than just another way to produce beautiful
abstract images?
I would like to have them too :)
- Hide quoted text -
On 8/18/06, ARN <info@x-arn.org> wrote:
> another quote:
> "The web, Charlie says, has the alarming potential of realising the idea of
> the artist Joseph Beuys, that everyone is an artist. This could spell the
> end of art as we know it, when everyone becomes a producer and we all drown
> in a sea of mediocrity made up of billions of minutely-niched microchannels."
>
> i think this is great, so will better write:
>
> "when everyone becomes a producer and we all grow in a great sea of
> experimentations made up of billions of creative microchannels."
>
> why being so alarmed by JB (& others) idea , Charlie ?
>
>
>
>
>
> marc wrote:
> > Wow - and now we have Charlie Gere putting us all down.
> >
> > "So are artists at the cutting edge of new-media technology? No, says
> > Charlie. One of the problems is that other stuff on the net is so much
> > more mind-blowing. A site such as Google Earth is so much more awesome
> > and thought-provoking than something an arty hacktivist can knock up on
> > her PC."
> >
> > I would love to have an open discussion with him about this stuff this
> > on-line.
> >
> > http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/mtaa/~3/13468813/the_times_uk_does_new_media.html
> >
> >
> > Also check rhizome front page...
> >
> > Thanks Charlie, we love you two ;-)
> >
> > marc
> >
>
> +
> -> post: list@rhizome.org
> -> questions: info@rhizome.org
> -> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
> -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
> +
> Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
> Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.php
>
--
"Bitter times, I wish I could reassure you."
.news series.
http://www.bram.org/press/rassur
"Bitter times, I wish I could reassure you."
Bitter times, I wish I could reassure you."
.news series.
http://www.bram.org/press/rassur
I used a movie from http://www.beirutletters.org , several
realvideofiles from "rassur" on bram.org and internetsources as De
Volkskrant, BBC, CNN and Bild. This piece is multilingual.
It uses pop ups, Realplayer and Quicktime plugin, and needs a fast
connexion and computer.
It's about three minutes long.
Best
Annie Abrahams
.news series.
http://www.bram.org/press/rassur
I used a movie from http://www.beirutletters.org , several
realvideofiles from "rassur" on bram.org and internetsources as De
Volkskrant, BBC, CNN and Bild. This piece is multilingual.
It uses pop ups, Realplayer and Quicktime plugin, and needs a fast
connexion and computer.
It's about three minutes long.
Best
Annie Abrahams
Re: Police officer killed in Berlin?
http://bram.org/beinghuman/poll/hans/violence.php
What is happening when violence is declared art ?
Why should someone do this ?
What does it mean?
On 5/2/06, Hans Bernhard <play@ubermorgen.com> wrote:
>
> We hereby declare this found footage video to be an
> actionist UBERMORGEN.COM art piece named
>
What is happening when violence is declared art ?
Why should someone do this ?
What does it mean?
On 5/2/06, Hans Bernhard <play@ubermorgen.com> wrote:
>
> We hereby declare this found footage video to be an
> actionist UBERMORGEN.COM art piece named
>
Re: Re:
I think you didn't get Patrick May's message:
"> From my perspective, the problem with this project is that it
consumed all memory on the server, leading to 3 server outages over
the weekend. Unfortunately the question of whether to ban is a moot
point, since I am compelled to block a denial of service.
> "
"no more rhizome" if he doesn't block mi_ga
at least that's what I understand
Is that what you want?
bye
Annie
ps
I like mi_ga
On 4/10/06, Lee Wells <lee@leewells.org> wrote:
> I feel the same way, but, lets make sure none of us have to deal with
> getting bombed by over 500 emails everyday.
>
> On 4/10/06 10:10 AM, "roberto echen" <rechen@rechen.com> wrote:
>
> > agree
> >
> > beate zurwehme wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> no, please don't ban him from the list. i think, automatic spam "art"
> >> is even better than naming others as "idiots".
> >>
> >> hier gehts um die freiheit der netze!
> >>
> >>
> >> Am 10.04.2006 um 12:18 schrieb Sofia Oliveira:
> >>
> >> please get rid of this idiot!
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: <mi_ga@o-o.lt>
> >> To: <list@rhizome.org>
> >> Sent: Sunday, April 09, 2006 7:49 AM
> >> Subject: RHIZOME_RAW: Re:
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>> mailia
> >>>
> >>> list@rhizome.org wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> good stuff
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> +
> >>> -> post: list@rhizome.org
> >>> -> questions: info@rhizome.org
> >>> -> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
> >>> -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
> >>> +
> >>> Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
> >>> Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.php
> >>>
"> From my perspective, the problem with this project is that it
consumed all memory on the server, leading to 3 server outages over
the weekend. Unfortunately the question of whether to ban is a moot
point, since I am compelled to block a denial of service.
> "
"no more rhizome" if he doesn't block mi_ga
at least that's what I understand
Is that what you want?
bye
Annie
ps
I like mi_ga
On 4/10/06, Lee Wells <lee@leewells.org> wrote:
> I feel the same way, but, lets make sure none of us have to deal with
> getting bombed by over 500 emails everyday.
>
> On 4/10/06 10:10 AM, "roberto echen" <rechen@rechen.com> wrote:
>
> > agree
> >
> > beate zurwehme wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> no, please don't ban him from the list. i think, automatic spam "art"
> >> is even better than naming others as "idiots".
> >>
> >> hier gehts um die freiheit der netze!
> >>
> >>
> >> Am 10.04.2006 um 12:18 schrieb Sofia Oliveira:
> >>
> >> please get rid of this idiot!
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: <mi_ga@o-o.lt>
> >> To: <list@rhizome.org>
> >> Sent: Sunday, April 09, 2006 7:49 AM
> >> Subject: RHIZOME_RAW: Re:
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>> mailia
> >>>
> >>> list@rhizome.org wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> good stuff
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> +
> >>> -> post: list@rhizome.org
> >>> -> questions: info@rhizome.org
> >>> -> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
> >>> -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
> >>> +
> >>> Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
> >>> Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.php
> >>>
RSS FEED
