Discussion Posts

Wikipedia Art

I just checked in with this thread again, and found: ************* 'Wikipedia Art' is utter bollocks. I have no intention of helping to further legitimize it it by providing reasoned and cited debate to support my statement. *************' ....

Los Angeles Art

Ok: Putting a link up and saying "discuss" Like Linda Richman isn't really a discussion. THAT BEING SAID, For next year's CAA, I'm doing a panel called "The Culture of Dispersion - Why Contemporary art is Everywhere, Yet Nowhere At All". This h....

Conference Report: NET.ART (SECOND EPOCH)

Josephine - Yes, I may be injecting too many issues here. Might be a good idea for a second thread. The Hal Foster link is brilliant - encapsulates a lot of what we're getting at. That's a really key point. As for epochs, I'm not sure if one ....

Conference Report: NET.ART (SECOND EPOCH)

Here is a tremendous conversation - generationalism in net. art. In regards to things like technological art, I posited about 3-4 years ago we were in a "fourth Generation" (the late 90's New Media people being the third, the group Cory Arcangel on ....

Wikipedia Art

Tom Moody Wrote. My outrage wasn’t mock and Lichty’s wasn’t outrage. He repeatedly cited his own academic credentials to justify the project. Now that it’s failed he claims to be blase about it. Either way, he played the Wikipedia editors fo....