-
Edwin VanGorder | Sat, Aug 7th, 2010 4:25 a.m.I admire the way the work initiates one into questing the question that if to see one thing you must also see another is it yet true the edge and center transposal to a singularity are a motion of things within things and a topography or is the positioning of the mind to understand time an inside out activity which in the end belongs to the things seen rather than the seer?You must be logged in to post a comment. Log In
-
gdsge | Sat, Aug 7th, 2010 5:55 a.m.admire the way the work initiates one into questing the question that if to see one thing you must also see another is it yet true the edge and center transposal to a singularity are a motion of things within things and a topography or is the positioning of the mind to understand time an inside out activity which in the end belongs to the things seen rather than the seer?You must be logged in to post a comment. Log In
-
michaelrayvon | Sun, Aug 8th, 2010 7:34 p.m.admire the way the work initiates one into questing the question that if to see one thing you must also see another is it yet true the edge and center transposal to a singularity are a motion of things within things and a topography or is the positioning of the mind to understand time an inside out activity which in the end belongs to the things seen rather than the seer?You must be logged in to post a comment. Log In
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Log In

