+ othermiscellanea 'art' observations by the very.dense Eryk Salvaggio
who only recognizes art if it's a think-dog wearing an 'art' tag around
itz tail
Many theater historians and critics label Alfred Jarry's French play, Ubu
Roi as the earliest example of Theatre of the Absurd. Absurdism also has
origins in Shakespearean drama, particularly through the influence of the
Commedia dell'Arte.
The current movement of absurdism, however, emerged in France after World
War II, as a rebellion against the traditional values and beliefs of
Western culture and literature.
Its rules are fairly simple:
1.) There is often no real story line; instead there is a series of "free
floating repetitive images" which influence the way in which an audience
interprets a play.
2.) There is a focus on the incomprehensibility of the world, or an
attempt to rationalize an irrational, disorderly world.
3.) Language acts as a barrier to communication, which in turn isolates
the individual even more, thus making speech almost futile.
language is the game+nediocre 'not literary' criticizm
-
Type: discussion
Comments
DID YOU FORGET ABOUT DADA DEATH YOU TWIITTER TWAT
idiot moron incompotent ha ha ha ha ha ha
— "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+"
<[email protected]> wrote:
> + othermiscellanea 'art' observations by the
> very.dense Eryk Salvaggio
> who only recognizes art if it's a think-dog
> wearing an 'art' tag around
> itz tail
>
> Many theater historians and critics label Alfred
> Jarry's French play, Ubu
> Roi as the earliest example of Theatre of the
> Absurd. Absurdism also has
> origins in Shakespearean drama, particularly through
> the influence of the
> Commedia dell'Arte.
>
> The current movement of absurdism, however, emerged
> in France after World
> War II, as a rebellion against the traditional
> values and beliefs of
> Western culture and literature.
>
> Its rules are fairly simple:
>
> 1.) There is often no real story line; instead there
> is a series of "free
> floating repetitive images" which influence the way
> in which an audience
> interprets a play.
>
> 2.) There is a focus on the incomprehensibility of
> the world, or an
> attempt to rationalize an irrational, disorderly
> world.
>
> 3.) Language acts as a barrier to communication,
> which in turn isolates
> the individual even more, thus making speech almost
> futile.
>
>
>
> + tripe
>
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More
http://faith.yahoo.com
Is there some reason my name was associated with this? Or did you just
feel like I wasn't paying enough attention to you lately? If it's the
latter, I'll try to be more attentive, I just didn't know you cared
about me as much as you seem to. I can't really figure out why. But it's
flattering.
Cheers,
-e.
-IID42 Kandinskij @27+ wrote:
>+ othermiscellanea 'art' observations by the very.dense Eryk Salvaggio
> who only recognizes art if it's a think-dog wearing an 'art' tag around
> itz tail
>
>Many theater historians and critics label Alfred Jarry's French play, Ubu
>Roi as the earliest example of Theatre of the Absurd. Absurdism also has
>origins in Shakespearean drama, particularly through the influence of the
>Commedia dell'Arte.
>
>The current movement of absurdism, however, emerged in France after World
>War II, as a rebellion against the traditional values and beliefs of
>Western culture and literature.
>
>Its rules are fairly simple:
>
>1.) There is often no real story line; instead there is a series of "free
>floating repetitive images" which influence the way in which an audience
>interprets a play.
>
>2.) There is a focus on the incomprehensibility of the world, or an
>attempt to rationalize an irrational, disorderly world.
>
>3.) Language acts as a barrier to communication, which in turn isolates
>the individual even more, thus making speech almost futile.
>
>
>
>+ tripe
>
>
Back up to your old plagiarising tricks again
( http://home.sprintmail.com/~lifeform/beckstop.html ). I looked up a
few of your posts around the net and noticed that you do alot of this
stuff. I guess it can be pretty tough thinking up smart sounding stuff
to say by oneself. Especially when you're on an entirely different
evolutionary plane than most of us, like you. Oh, don't tell me, I'm not
qualified to say such things. Well, I think I may have met some friends
of yours in Roswell, NM a few years ago and they gave me the special
visitors pass so I'm qualified every fifth month of every third year
provided that the stars are correctly aligned. A small spot in my brain
starts to quiver around that time. I think it's from the implant.
Hinn 12.10.2002 kl. 19:30 ritadhi -IID42 Kandinskij @27+:
> + othermiscellanea 'art' observations by the very.dense Eryk Salvaggio
> who only recognizes art if it's a think-dog wearing an 'art' tag
> around
> itz tail
>
> Many theater historians and critics label Alfred Jarry's French play,
> Ubu
> Roi as the earliest example of Theatre of the Absurd. Absurdism also has
> origins in Shakespearean drama, particularly through the influence of
> the
> Commedia dell'Arte.
>
> The current movement of absurdism, however, emerged in France after
> World
> War II, as a rebellion against the traditional values and beliefs of
> Western culture and literature.
>
> Its rules are fairly simple:
>
> 1.) There is often no real story line; instead there is a series of
> "free
> floating repetitive images" which influence the way in which an audience
> interprets a play.
>
> 2.) There is a focus on the incomprehensibility of the world, or an
> attempt to rationalize an irrational, disorderly world.
>
> 3.) Language acts as a barrier to communication, which in turn isolates
> the individual even more, thus making speech almost futile.
>
>
>
> + tripe
>
>
_____________________________________
Pall Thayer
myndlistamadhur/kennari
artist/teacher
Fjolbrautaskolanum vidh Armula (www.fa.is)
http://www.this.is/pallit
_____________________________________
On Sat, 12 Oct 2002, Eryk Salvaggio wrote:
> Is there some reason my name was associated with this?
Yes.
> Or did you just feel like I wasn't paying enough attention to you lately?
Myopic condescending projection.
> If it's the latter, I'll try to be more attentive,
As above.
> I just didn't know you cared about me as much as you seem to.
I don't. You're projecting wishfully, in order to appear
humorous. How ironic.
> I can't really figure out why. But it's flattering.
Sure is. If I came over and kicked you in the stomach
that'd be cause I skeek your attention, and you'd be flattered
too.
Sickening. What an amoeba.
On Sun, 13 Oct 2002, Eryk Salvaggio wrote:
> > Yes.
> >
>
> And what would that reason be.
You tell me.
> Then why are you still talking about me?
Why why why.
Because because because.
> You have a weird sense of humor if you thought I was being funny.
I didn't. Nor did I 'think'.
> You wouldn't kick me in the stomach if you were ambivilent towards me,
> would you?
I wouldn't? What a relational assumption.
My actions are not directed by any sort of relation to you.
You interpret all that Ido as 'personal'.
> >Sickening. What an amoeba.
> >
>
> I start at zero and split many times over into many more zeros, zeds and
> zzzzzzzzz's.
>
>
> Protozoa,
> -e.
If you say so.
-IID42 Kandinskij @27+ wrote:
>On Sat, 12 Oct 2002, Eryk Salvaggio wrote:
>
>>Is there some reason my name was associated with this?
>>
>
> Yes.
>
And what would that reason be.
>I just didn't know you cared about me as much as you seem to.
>
>
> I don't.
>
Then why are you still talking about me?
>You're projecting wishfully, in order to appear
> humorous. How ironic.
>
You have a weird sense of humor if you thought I was being funny.
>
>I can't really figure out why. But it's flattering.
>
>
> Sure is. If I came over and kicked you in the stomach
> that'd be cause I skeek your attention, and you'd be flattered
> too.
>
You wouldn't kick me in the stomach if you were ambivilent towards me,
would you?
>Sickening. What an amoeba.
>
I start at zero and split many times over into many more zeros, zeds and
zzzzzzzzz's.
Protozoa,
-e.
sux
|
|
|
V
On Sat, 12 Oct 2002, Pall Thayer wrote:
> Back up to your old plagiarising tricks again
Dear pall. No, the only one 'back to tricks again' here is you.
You're thoroughly mediocre, imbecilic and murderous.
> ( http://home.sprintmail.com/~lifeform/beckstop.html ). I looked up a
> few of your posts around the net and noticed that you do alot of this
> stuff.
No, I don't. Really Pall. Nor is this 'plagiarization'.
Keep your myopic misinterpretations of reality to yourself.
> I guess it can be pretty tough thinking up smart sounding stuff
> to say by oneself.
Considering that I rarely quote luv, nor am I interested in 'thinking up
smart sounding stuff''–keep your own hang ups to yourself.
> Especially when you're on an entirely different evolutionary plane than
> most of us, like you.
Certainly am. You're making that plenty obvious.
> Oh, don't tell me, I'm not qualified to say such things.
You're not.
> Well, I think I may have met some friends
> of yours in Roswell, NM a few years ago and they gave me the special
> visitors pass so I'm qualified every fifth month of every third year
> provided that the stars are correctly aligned.
Delusional ape.
> A small spot in my brain
> starts to quiver around that time. I think it's from the implant.
Must be. Considering your masochistic murderous brute impulses.
`, . ` `k a r e i' ? ' D42
On Sat, 12 Oct 2002, N Myers wrote:
> DID YOU FORGET ABOUT DADA DEATH YOU TWIITTER TWAT
The only 'twitter twat' here is you, dear.
And your response is that of a cackling imbecile.
> idiot moron incompotent ha ha ha ha ha ha
You are.
Ay more knee-jerk spat-outs?