Re: RE: RHIZOME_RAW: not Sooo sorry,

hey Steve,

i suppose that an answer could be something like… regardless of choice
of mediums, artists artmakings most often come from the same origins or
core (hahaha ha)…. So i suppose that the medium and its various
crosswired messages are all water consumed from the same well. If there
echolli in the wellspring and the thirst is running rampant - better start
pumping out the "Rare" vaccinations - but of course that slippery slope is
for another other e-day.

With a pound of luck, new media and its users will evolve into one big
happy biotechnicized (All in the) family - but this is definitely not Star
Trek; there are multiple species out there with really pissy attitudes.

i do like your phrase "wired contingent"… i feel like i should go plug in
something else!

cheers, d


From:[email protected] [SMTP:[email protected]]
Sent:Monday, September 23, 2002 5:35 PM
To:[email protected]
Cc:[email protected]
Subject:RHIZOME_RAW: RE: RHIZOME_RAW: not SO sorry

Doug

the question is why people writing on the Rhizome list continue to function
in this way. Are the new mediums supposed to be different or not? Is this
list really that different from the phantasmagoria of hollywood and the
associated media? Or are the new media just a continuation of the
reactionary phantasies of the wired contingent?

regards
steve

>speaking as a Canadian (though i try not to be so regionalist) - i
>concur… personally i blame Hollywood.
>
> regards, d
>
> —–Original Message—–
> From:sbrockbank [SMTP:[email protected]]
> Sent:Saturday, September 21, 2002 1:46 PM
> To:arc .- -. –. . .-..
> Cc:[email protected]
> Subject:Re: RHIZOME_RAW: sorry
>
> Rhizome
>
>sorry - i just discovered you all seem to be addicted to insulting each
>other over a safe distence… it hadn't occured to me that this was
>going to be the normal approach of the list… is this a reflection of
>the normalised aggression of the US citizen?
>
>s
>
>
>
> + une dans la gueule, and two for tea !
> -> post: [email protected]
> -> questions: [email protected]
> -> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
> -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
> +
> Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
> Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.php


+ http://rhizome.org/cgi/slogan.cgi
-> post: [email protected]
-> questions: [email protected]
-> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
-> give: http://rhizome.org/support
+
Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.php

Comments

, D42 Kandinskij

> From:[email protected] [SMTP:[email protected]]

> the question is why people writing on the Rhizome list continue to function
> in this way. Are the new mediums supposed to be different or not? Is this
> list really that different from the phantasmagoria of hollywood and the
> associated media? Or are the new media just a continuation of the
> reactionary phantasies of the wired contingent?
>
> regards
> steve

I'll give you one very easy answer–they don't.
You have an idiotic function you've set up in your brain,
one that makes you feel you're 'superior' and 'have americans
figured out'–and you will keep attempting to enforce that fraudulent
stereotype on them until you die. And you will, so perceptively
continue to pose–but why dont they stop acting that way?

THEY NEVER STARTED TO BEGIN WITH; YOU PATHETIC TWIT!

Love.

Ditz.

, D42 Kandinskij

Also, I really want to know:

when will ALL AMERICANS stop eating red caviar for breakfast?

The questionis driving me nuts,
and I shant sleep until there isa resolution.

This isa HOLY WAR I tell you.

And Im going to have Eryk salvaggio ias my general.

, Ana Valdes

If someone is a pathetic twit or a imbecile frog or other, I don't care. Why
discharge in a public list all these childish invectives? Grow up people and
insult each other privately, please.
Ana




"-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" wrote:

> > From: [email protected] [SMTP:[email protected]]
>
> > the question is why people writing on the Rhizome list continue to function
> > in this way. Are the new mediums supposed to be different or not? Is this
> > list really that different from the phantasmagoria of hollywood and the
> > associated media? Or are the new media just a continuation of the
> > reactionary phantasies of the wired contingent?
> >
> > regards
> > steve
>
> I'll give you one very easy answer–they don't.
> You have an idiotic function you've set up in your brain,
> one that makes you feel you're 'superior' and 'have americans
> figured out'–and you will keep attempting to enforce that fraudulent
> stereotype on them until you die. And you will, so perceptively
> continue to pose–but why dont they stop acting that way?
>
> THEY NEVER STARTED TO BEGIN WITH; YOU PATHETIC TWIT!
>
> Love.
>
> Ditz.
>

"-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" wrote:

> > From: [email protected] [SMTP:[email protected]]
>
> > the question is why people writing on the Rhizome list continue to function
> > in this way. Are the new mediums supposed to be different or not? Is this
> > list really that different from the phantasmagoria of hollywood and the
> > associated media? Or are the new media just a continuation of the
> > reactionary phantasies of the wired contingent?
> >
> > regards
> > steve
>
> I'll give you one very easy answer–they don't.
> You have an idiotic function you've set up in your brain,
> one that makes you feel you're 'superior' and 'have americans
> figured out'–and you will keep attempting to enforce that fraudulent
> stereotype on them until you die. And you will, so perceptively
> continue to pose–but why dont they stop acting that way?
>
> THEY NEVER STARTED TO BEGIN WITH; YOU PATHETIC TWIT!
>
> Love.
>
> Ditz.
>
> + the assholes playground
> -> post: [email protected]
> -> questions: [email protected]
> -> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
> -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
> +
> Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
> Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.php

, D42 Kandinskij

On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, ana l. [iso-8859-1] valdes wrote:

> If someone is a pathetic twit or a imbecile frog or other, I don't care.

And the world revolves around you, and what you care and don't care
about. I forgot, Mme, sorry,

> Why discharge

I am not 'discraging' anything.

> in a public list all these childish invectives?

These are not childish invectives.

> Grow up people

Start with yourself.

> insult each other privately, please.

That's nice dear. Why don't you take your own advice,
and not send this e-mail which reeks of self-important
conceit?

I certainly am not insulting anyone,
so spare me your half-witted judgement.

, clement Thomas

dear Ana,

of course it would be more simple to kill the egg in the hen, or to never
let the magic bean grow up to the sky.
but, who would find the golden treasure then ?
Believe me, if cash flow follows trash flows, thus pavu.com's plining
technology will assure you the best value in upgrade.
Flame floods and spams are the natural catastrophes of the mailing lists,
and you can't hide from an stormquaker by reading THE hazebook with
sunglasses.

of course, if Wonder Woman is not the solution you expected to get ride of
these stallonic stickists, i may suggest soft therapy.

you believe in sychotherapy but don't trust the doctor ?
Sing the trashmails and make new friends for free.
http://ctgr.free.fr/ctgr-chante/index.html
-/ don't trash your trash mails, sing it ! /-
btw,
"Grow up people and insult each other privately, please."
is a very good title for a flame song.

with all my love,

OG


—– Original Message —–
From: "ana l. valdes" <[email protected]>
To: "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" <[email protected]>
Cc: "Doug Lewis" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>;
<[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 8:36 AM
Subject: Re: RHIZOME_RAW: RE: RHIZOME_RAW: not Sooo sorry,


>
> If someone is a pathetic twit or a imbecile frog or other, I don't care.
Why
> discharge in a public list all these childish invectives? Grow up people
and
> insult each other privately, please.
> Ana
>
>
>
>
> "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" wrote:
>
> > > From: [email protected] [SMTP:[email protected]]
> >
> > > the question is why people writing on the Rhizome list continue to
function
> > > in this way. Are the new mediums supposed to be different or not? Is
this
> > > list really that different from the phantasmagoria of hollywood and
the
> > > associated media? Or are the new media just a continuation of the
> > > reactionary phantasies of the wired contingent?
> > >
> > > regards
> > > steve
> >
> > I'll give you one very easy answer–they don't.
> > You have an idiotic function you've set up in your brain,
> > one that makes you feel you're 'superior' and 'have americans
> > figured out'–and you will keep attempting to enforce that fraudulent
> > stereotype on them until you die. And you will, so perceptively
> > continue to pose–but why dont they stop acting that way?
> >
> > THEY NEVER STARTED TO BEGIN WITH; YOU PATHETIC TWIT!
> >
> > Love.
> >
> > Ditz.
> >
>
> "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" wrote:
>
> > > From: [email protected] [SMTP:[email protected]]
> >
> > > the question is why people writing on the Rhizome list continue to
function
> > > in this way. Are the new mediums supposed to be different or not? Is
this
> > > list really that different from the phantasmagoria of hollywood and
the
> > > associated media? Or are the new media just a continuation of the
> > > reactionary phantasies of the wired contingent?
> > >
> > > regards
> > > steve
> >
> > I'll give you one very easy answer–they don't.
> > You have an idiotic function you've set up in your brain,
> > one that makes you feel you're 'superior' and 'have americans
> > figured out'–and you will keep attempting to enforce that fraudulent
> > stereotype on them until you die. And you will, so perceptively
> > continue to pose–but why dont they stop acting that way?
> >
> > THEY NEVER STARTED TO BEGIN WITH; YOU PATHETIC TWIT!
> >
> > Love.
> >
> > Ditz.
> >
> > + the assholes playground
> > -> post: [email protected]
> > -> questions: [email protected]
> > -> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
> > -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
> > +
> > Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
> > Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.php
>
> + the assholes playground
> -> post: [email protected]
> -> questions: [email protected]
> -> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
> -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
> +
> Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
> Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.php
>

, Ana Valdes

It seems all mailinglists and public arenas has the same problem, a few highly
verbal skilled people use it to exchange invectives and try to state their own
values and merits, the result is often that the other ones, the people
interested in exchanges of experiences and knowledge, dissapear and go
elsewhere. I choose this alternative and guess that you and and the few who
enjoy the first one are going to be alone in your kindergarden.
Good luck
Ana

"-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" wrote:

> On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, ana l. [iso-8859-1] valdes wrote:
>
> > If someone is a pathetic twit or a imbecile frog or other, I don't care.
>
> And the world revolves around you, and what you care and don't care
> about. I forgot, Mme, sorry,
>
> > Why discharge
>
> I am not 'discraging' anything.
>
> > in a public list all these childish invectives?
>
> These are not childish invectives.
>
> > Grow up people
>
> Start with yourself.
>
> > insult each other privately, please.
>
> That's nice dear. Why don't you take your own advice,
> and not send this e-mail which reeks of self-important
> conceit?
>
> I certainly am not insulting anyone,
> so spare me your half-witted judgement.
>
> + the assholes playground
> -> post: [email protected]
> -> questions: [email protected]
> -> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
> -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
> +
> Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
> Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.php

, marc garrett

Ace!

Thanx Clement - brilliant. Love it…especially 'Dog Mama'.

marc


> dear Ana,
>
> of course it would be more simple to kill the egg in the hen, or to never
> let the magic bean grow up to the sky.
> but, who would find the golden treasure then ?
> Believe me, if cash flow follows trash flows, thus pavu.com's plining
> technology will assure you the best value in upgrade.
> Flame floods and spams are the natural catastrophes of the mailing lists,
> and you can't hide from an stormquaker by reading THE hazebook with
> sunglasses.
>
> of course, if Wonder Woman is not the solution you expected to get ride of
> these stallonic stickists, i may suggest soft therapy.
>
> you believe in sychotherapy but don't trust the doctor ?
> Sing the trashmails and make new friends for free.
> http://ctgr.free.fr/ctgr-chante/index.html
> -/ don't trash your trash mails, sing it ! /-
> btw,
> "Grow up people and insult each other privately, please."
> is a very good title for a flame song.
>
> with all my love,
>
> OG
>
>
> —– Original Message —–
> From: "ana l. valdes" <[email protected]>
> To: "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" <[email protected]>
> Cc: "Doug Lewis" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>;
> <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 8:36 AM
> Subject: Re: RHIZOME_RAW: RE: RHIZOME_RAW: not Sooo sorry,
>
>
> >
> > If someone is a pathetic twit or a imbecile frog or other, I don't care.
> Why
> > discharge in a public list all these childish invectives? Grow up people
> and
> > insult each other privately, please.
> > Ana
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" wrote:
> >
> > > > From: [email protected] [SMTP:[email protected]]
> > >
> > > > the question is why people writing on the Rhizome list continue to
> function
> > > > in this way. Are the new mediums supposed to be different or not? Is
> this
> > > > list really that different from the phantasmagoria of hollywood and
> the
> > > > associated media? Or are the new media just a continuation of the
> > > > reactionary phantasies of the wired contingent?
> > > >
> > > > regards
> > > > steve
> > >
> > > I'll give you one very easy answer–they don't.
> > > You have an idiotic function you've set up in your brain,
> > > one that makes you feel you're 'superior' and 'have americans
> > > figured out'–and you will keep attempting to enforce that fraudule=
nt
> > > stereotype on them until you die. And you will, so perceptively
> > > continue to pose–but why dont they stop acting that way?
> > >
> > > THEY NEVER STARTED TO BEGIN WITH; YOU PATHETIC TWIT!
> > >
> > > Love.
> > >
> > > Ditz.
> > >
> >
> > "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" wrote:
> >
> > > > From: [email protected] [SMTP:[email protected]]
> > >
> > > > the question is why people writing on the Rhizome list continue to
> function
> > > > in this way. Are the new mediums supposed to be different or not? Is
> this
> > > > list really that different from the phantasmagoria of hollywood and
> the
> > > > associated media? Or are the new media just a continuation of the
> > > > reactionary phantasies of the wired contingent?
> > > >
> > > > regards
> > > > steve
> > >
> > > I'll give you one very easy answer–they don't.
> > > You have an idiotic function you've set up in your brain,
> > > one that makes you feel you're 'superior' and 'have americans
> > > figured out'–and you will keep attempting to enforce that fraudule=
nt
> > > stereotype on them until you die. And you will, so perceptively
> > > continue to pose–but why dont they stop acting that way?
> > >
> > > THEY NEVER STARTED TO BEGIN WITH; YOU PATHETIC TWIT!
> > >
> > > Love.
> > >
> > > Ditz.
> > >
> > > + the assholes playground
> > > -> post: [email protected]
> > > -> questions: [email protected]
> > > -> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rh=
iz
> > > -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
> > > +
> > > Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
> > > Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.p=
hp
> >
> > + the assholes playground
> > -> post: [email protected]
> > -> questions: [email protected]
> > -> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
> > -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
> > +
> > Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
> > Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.php
> >
>
> + the assholes playground
> -> post: [email protected]
> -> questions: [email protected]
> -> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
> -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
> +
> Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
> Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.php
>

, D42 Kandinskij

On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, ana l. [iso-8859-1] valdes wrote:

> It seems all mailinglists and public arenas has the same problem, a few highly
> verbal skilled people use it to exchange invectives

Nobody is 'exchanging invectives'.

> and try to state their own values and merits,

Nor is anyone involved in stating values in merits.

> the result is often that the other ones, the people
> interested in exchanges of experiences and knowledge, dissapear and go
> elsewhere.

Chuckle. One cannot 'exchange' experience and knowledge.
As for the rest; the righteous will indignantly walk away?

> I choose this alternative

Right. Yet another attempt to stomp your little foot–
nacked up by a whole crowd of followers, those 'interested
in exchanges of nonsense,' n'est pas?

The petulant princess pose, is by far the favorite it seems.

> and guess that you and and the few who
> enjoy the first one are going to be alone in your kindergarden.

Right. wants to throw insults, and cleanly walk off.
The prima-donna.

The only one in kindergarten here is you, dearest.

As for being alone–everyone is.
Don't attempt to raise that 'if you don't behave, the mob
will leave you' trick.

That has never been the case + you are attempting
'righteous' ostracizing.

> Good luck

Insincerity does not suit you, dear.

, clement Thomas

dear Ana,

so sorry that you leave rhizome list in autumn,
You know there are few leaves to fall now, soon the white winter calm will
be back.

anyway, what i wanted to say is that you have a mirror woman friend here in
France, called Aliette, and she also writes songs like you do, where she
says " I don't quit the list…"
listen,
http://ctgr.free.fr/ctgr-chante/songs/AG004.mp3

I'm glad and lucky too, and I want to thank you for your song.
soon online.

wishing you the best always,


OG
http://ctgr.free.fr/ctgr-chante/
the Flame Songs

—– Original Message —–
From: "ana l. valdes" <[email protected]>
To: "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" <[email protected]>
Cc: "Doug Lewis" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>;
<[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 7:54 PM
Subject: Re: RHIZOME_RAW: RE: RHIZOME_RAW: not Sooo sorry,


> It seems all mailinglists and public arenas has the same problem, a few
highly
> verbal skilled people use it to exchange invectives and try to state their
own
> values and merits, the result is often that the other ones, the people
> interested in exchanges of experiences and knowledge, dissapear and go
> elsewhere. I choose this alternative and guess that you and and the few
who
> enjoy the first one are going to be alone in your kindergarden.
> Good luck
> Ana
>
> "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, ana l. [iso-8859-1] valdes wrote:
> >
> > > If someone is a pathetic twit or a imbecile frog or other, I don't
care.
> >
> > And the world revolves around you, and what you care and don't care
> > about. I forgot, Mme, sorry,
> >
> > > Why discharge
> >
> > I am not 'discraging' anything.
> >
> > > in a public list all these childish invectives?
> >
> > These are not childish invectives.
> >
> > > Grow up people
> >
> > Start with yourself.
> >
> > > insult each other privately, please.
> >
> > That's nice dear. Why don't you take your own advice,
> > and not send this e-mail which reeks of self-important
> > conceit?
> >
> > I certainly am not insulting anyone,
> > so spare me your half-witted judgement.
> >
> > + the assholes playground
> > -> post: [email protected]
> > -> questions: [email protected]
> > -> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
> > -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
> > +
> > Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
> > Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.php
>
> + Barbarians at the XOR-gate
> -> post: [email protected]
> -> questions: [email protected]
> -> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
> -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
> +
> Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
> Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.php
>

, clement Thomas

my pleasure, marc

Dog Mama is to enter the top ten.

best


OG
—– Original Message —–
From: furtherfield
To: clement Thomas ; [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 12:27 AM
Subject: Re: RHIZOME_RAW: RE: RHIZOME_RAW: not Sooo sorry,


Ace!

Thanx Clement - brilliant. Love it…especially 'Dog Mama'.

marc


> dear Ana,
>
> of course it would be more simple to kill the egg in the hen, or to nev=
er
> let the magic bean grow up to the sky.
> but, who would find the golden treasure then ?
> Believe me, if cash flow follows trash flows, thus pavu.com's plining
> technology will assure you the best value in upgrade.
> Flame floods and spams are the natural catastrophes of the mailing list=
s,
> and you can't hide from an stormquaker by reading THE hazebook with
> sunglasses.
>
> of course, if Wonder Woman is not the solution you expected to get ride=
of
> these stallonic stickists, i may suggest soft therapy.
>
> you believe in sychotherapy but don't trust the doctor ?
> Sing the trashmails and make new friends for free.
> http://ctgr.free.fr/ctgr-chante/index.html
> -/ don't trash your trash mails, sing it ! /-
> btw,
> "Grow up people and insult each other privately, please."
> is a very good title for a flame song.
>
> with all my love,
>
> OG
>
>
> —– Original Message —–
> From: "ana l. valdes" <[email protected]>
> To: "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" <[email protected]>
> Cc: "Doug Lewis" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>;
> <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 8:36 AM
> Subject: Re: RHIZOME_RAW: RE: RHIZOME_RAW: not Sooo sorry,
>
>
> >
> > If someone is a pathetic twit or a imbecile frog or other, I don't ca=
re.
> Why
> > discharge in a public list all these childish invectives? Grow up peo=
ple
> and
> > insult each other privately, please.
> > Ana
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" wrote:
> >
> > > > From: [email protected] [SMTP:[email protected]]
> > >
> > > > the question is why people writing on the Rhizome list continue to
> function
> > > > in this way. Are the new mediums supposed to be different or not
Is
> this
> > > > list really that different from the phantasmagoria of hollywood a=
nd
> the
> > > > associated media? Or are the new media just a continuation of the
> > > > reactionary phantasies of the wired contingent?
> > > >
> > > > regards
> > > > steve
> > >
> > > I'll give you one very easy answer–they don't.
> > > You have an idiotic function you've set up in your brain,
> > > one that makes you feel you're 'superior' and 'have americans
> > > figured out'–and you will keep attempting to enforce that fraudu=
lent
> > > stereotype on them until you die. And you will, so perceptively
> > > continue to pose–but why dont they stop acting that way?
> > >
> > > THEY NEVER STARTED TO BEGIN WITH; YOU PATHETIC TWIT!
> > >
> > > Love.
> > >
> > > Ditz.
> > >
> >
> > "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" wrote:
> >
> > > > From: [email protected] [SMTP:[email protected]]
> > >
> > > > the question is why people writing on the Rhizome list continue to
> function
> > > > in this way. Are the new mediums supposed to be different or not
Is
> this
> > > > list really that different from the phantasmagoria of hollywood a=
nd
> the
> > > > associated media? Or are the new media just a continuation of the
> > > > reactionary phantasies of the wired contingent?
> > > >
> > > > regards
> > > > steve
> > >
> > > I'll give you one very easy answer–they don't.
> > > You have an idiotic function you've set up in your brain,
> > > one that makes you feel you're 'superior' and 'have americans
> > > figured out'–and you will keep attempting to enforce that fraudu=
lent
> > > stereotype on them until you die. And you will, so perceptively
> > > continue to pose–but why dont they stop acting that way?
> > >
> > > THEY NEVER STARTED TO BEGIN WITH; YOU PATHETIC TWIT!
> > >
> > > Love.
> > >
> > > Ditz.
> > >
> > > + the assholes playground
> > > -> post: [email protected]
> > > -> questions: [email protected]
> > > -> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.=
rhiz
> > > -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
> > > +
> > > Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
> > > Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29=
.php
> >
> > + the assholes playground
> > -> post: [email protected]
> > -> questions: [email protected]
> > -> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rh=
iz
> > -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
> > +
> > Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
> > Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.p=
hp
> >
>
> + the assholes playground
> -> post: [email protected]
> -> questions: [email protected]
> -> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
> -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
> +
> Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
> Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.php
>